1 / 43

Effectiveness and Training-Transfer of CAFT programmes at NARS

Effectiveness and Training-Transfer of CAFT programmes at NARS. R. Venkattakumar & B. S. Sontakki NAARM Hyderabad. Training-transfer. Capacity building. Expensive. Crucial. Reported as deficit. Training-transfer. HR Practitioners. Researchers.

jleatherman
Download Presentation

Effectiveness and Training-Transfer of CAFT programmes at NARS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effectiveness and Training-Transfer of CAFT programmes at NARS R. Venkattakumar & B. S. Sontakki NAARM Hyderabad

  2. Training-transfer Capacity building Expensive Crucial Reported as deficit Training-transfer HR Practitioners Researchers Justify investment, and prove link between- Training & organizational outcomes Systems’ perspectives

  3. Systems’ perspectives to training-transfer

  4. Objectives • To assess the perception of CAFT participants towards the effectiveness of CAFT programmes • To capture the training-transfer by CAFT participants and the resultant transfer outcomes • To assess the perception of peer group and deputing authorities towards performance of CAFT participants • To suggest strategies to improve the design, pattern and content of CAFT programmes

  5. Methodology

  6. Conceptual model proposed for assessing training-transfer Trainees’ attributes - Before training Trainees attributes’ - During training Trainees attributes’ - After training Self-efficacy Organizational commitment Perceived utility Cognitive ability Conscientiousness Goal orientation Motivation to transfer Personal capacity to transfer Locus of control Organizational climate-After training Organizational climate-Before training Transfer outcomes Accountability Positive personal outcomes Supervisor sanctions Task constraints Performance Coaching Resistance to change Job autonomy Work environment Peer support Supervisor support Strategic link TTD – During training TTD – Before training TTD – After training Training needs analysis Content relevance Active learning Varied practice Technological tools Training evaluation

  7. Personal profile

  8. Distribution of respondents-States Response from 25 states

  9. Distribution of respondents-CAFT centres

  10. Distribution of respondents-CAFT centres (Continued….)

  11. Source of training information

  12. Motivation behind training participation (* - Multiple response)

  13. Methods of pre-training preparation (Involved in pre-training preparation – 58%) (* - Multiple response)

  14. (Participants who shared – 84 %) (* - Multiple response)

  15. (* - Multiple response)

  16. Training-transfer After (10 point scale)

  17. Training-transfer After During Before (10 point scale)

  18. Training-transfer After (10 point scale)

  19. Perception towards transfer outcomes (10 point scale)

  20. Training-transfer system (10 point scale)

  21. Relationship between variables of training-transfer and transfer outcomes (**- Significance at 1 % probability level; *-Significance at 5 % probability level)

  22. Relationship between variables of training-transfer and transfer outcomes (**- Significance at 1 % probability level; *-Significance at 5 % probability level)

  23. Relationship between variables of training-transfer and transfer outcomes (**- Significance at 1 % probability level; *-Significance at 5 % probability level)

  24. Perceived - effectiveness of CAFT training programmes (10 point scale)

  25. Preferred Training Methods (10 point scale)

  26. Empirical model showing training-transfer Trainees attributes - After training Trainees’ attributes - Before training Trainees attributes - During training Self-efficacy Organizational commitment Perceived utility Cognitive ability Conscientiousness Personal capacity to transfer Locus of control Organizational climate-Before training Organizational climate-After training Transfer outcomes Work environment Peer support Supervisor support Strategic link Accountability Positive personal outcomes Performance Coaching Job autonomy TTD – Before training TTD – After training Training needs analysis Content relevance Training evaluation

  27. Impact of CAFT programme on teaching activities-A case of SKUAST

  28. Impact of CAFT programme on research activities-A case of SKUAST

  29. Impact of CAFT programme on extension activities-A case of SKUAST

  30. Concurrent evaluation of CAFT effectiveness - MVC, Chennai

  31. (5 point scale)

  32. CAFT effectiveness-Case of MPKV, Rahuri

  33. Recommendations • To attract wider participation programmes should be announced at least three months ahead. • Multiple communication modes (mail, e-mail and uploading in website) may be employed. • Eligibility criteria for participant’s selection should be explicitly spelt-out in all communications. • Brochure must contain details of core contents and resource persons. • Day-wise training schedule of the programme should be prepared well ahead of the programme and communicated to the selected participants before the start of the programme. • Bound volume of the resource material should be distributed to the participants on the first day of the programme. • CAFT centres should organize one follow-up workshop in a block of five years to share their training-transfer experiences.

  34. Recommendations (Continued…..) • CAFT centres should maintain a database of participants’ profile, training expectations and impact. • Existing provisions for inviting guest faculty may be suitably enhanced in terms of number and amount of honorarium/ remuneration. • Centre of Faculty Excellence may be established in each SAU to address the capacity building needs of the faculty. • Sponsoring organization should ensure peer and supervisor support, resource commitment and suitable incentives to the trained participants. • It should be made mandatory for CAFT participants to formally share their training experiences at the department level. • CAFT centres should have a webpage linked to the website of the host organization on training database, resource material etc. • CAFT centres should organize appropriate fora for identifying and documenting training needs in their respective domain areas.

  35. Recommendations (Continued…..) • CAFT centres may propose context-specific contractual services under contingencies head of the CAFT budget. • Use adequate interactive lectures, method demonstrations and hands-on practical or experience. • There should be either 60:40 or 50:50 theory: practical proportion in the pedagogy. • There should be mandatory training evaluation. • Performance assessment of CAFT centres may be done every year in terms of pedagogy, training environment, training effectiveness and impact. • Award/s may be constituted for rating by students about the teaching performance of the faculty.

  36. Thankyou

More Related