70 likes | 207 Views
PREMIS Conformance. Brian Lavoie Research Scientist OCLC lavoie@oclc.org PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA October 7, 2009. PREMIS Conformance. Experience in implementation, managing, and using PREMIS semantic units growing
E N D
PREMIS Conformance Brian Lavoie Research Scientist OCLC lavoie@oclc.org PREMIS Implementation Fair San Francisco, CA October 7, 2009
PREMIS Conformance • Experience in implementation, managing, and using PREMIS semantic units growing • Corresponding need to cultivate deeper understanding of what it means to be “PREMIS conformant” • Need new conformance statement that is more detailed and more actionable • Detailed: precise definition of what conformance means in light of emerging use cases; • Actionable: of practical use as resource for assessing conformance of a given PREMIS implementation • Subgroup within PREMIS Editorial Committee formed • Brian Lavoie, Rebecca Guenther, Priscilla Caplan, Angela Dappert, Sally Vermaaten, Yair Brama
Current conformance principles (v1.0 & v2.0) • “PREMIS conformance requires a preservation repository to follow the specifications outlined in the Data Dictionary.” • Specific guidelines dealing with name collision, schema overlap, “mandatoryness”, data constraints, exchange, … • Distills down into four basic conformance principles: • WEAK PRINCIPLE OF USE: If you use a PREMIS semantic unit, you must follow the requirements and constraints prescribed in the Dictionary for that semantic unit to be conformant. • STRONG PRINCIPLE OF USE: If you implement the PREMIS Data Dictionary, you must implement the mandatory semantic units to be conformant. • WEAK PRINCIPLE OF EXCHANGE: If you exchange a PREMIS semantic unit with another entity, the semantic unit must adhere to the specifications prescribed in the Dictionary to be conformant. • STRONG PRINCIPLE OF EXCHANGE: If you exchange a complete set of preservation metadata with another entity, the metadata must include all mandatory PREMIS semantic units to be conformant.
Conformance: a new look • Develop new PREMIS conformance statement: • Dictionary & schema likely to be stable for foreseeable future • Critical mass of implementation experiences to identify practical needs & requirements • Goals: • Conformance statement that resembles “checklist” • Primary for repository self-assessment • Oriented toward small set of key PREMIS conformance use cases • Editorial Committee subgroup • Draft/analyze use cases • Produce draft conformance statement • Submit to Editorial Committee for review and comment
Use cases for conformance • Inter-repository exchange • e.g., TIPR project • Repository certification • e.g., TRAC • Registries • e.g., PRONOM, United Digital Format Registry • Automated workflows/reusable tools • e.g., SIP/AIP processing • Vendor support • e.g., Ex Libris Rosetta
Issues, etc. • Scope: does conformance include guidelines for schema validation, use of controlled vocabularies, etc.? • Mandatory semantic units: clearer notion of what mandatory elements in the PREMIS Data Dictionary represent (or equivalently, what “mandatory” means) • Multiple levels of conformance: • Across different degrees of DD implementation: if repository uses only a small number of semantic units, this would support a minimal rather than optimal conformance. • Across use cases: different use case requirements may lead to different notions of conformance. • Current status: • Use cases drafted; analysis and synthesis underway • Conformance statement ready for public release by end of fall