1 / 15

PM 2.5 : NAAQS & Permit Issues

PM 2.5 : NAAQS & Permit Issues. Key Developments: PM 2.5 & Air Toxics A&WMA-NES Webinar April 9, 2013. Alison Simcox , PhD US EPA Region 1 Air Quality Planning Unit. Outline. 2012 PM 2.5 NAAQS Recent DC Court Decisions: PM 2.5 Implementation Rule Significant Impact Levels (SILs)

joyce
Download Presentation

PM 2.5 : NAAQS & Permit Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PM2.5 : NAAQS & Permit Issues Key Developments: PM2.5 & Air Toxics A&WMA-NES Webinar April 9, 2013 Alison Simcox, PhD US EPA Region 1 Air Quality Planning Unit

  2. Outline • 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS • Recent DC Court Decisions: • PM2.5 Implementation Rule • Significant Impact Levels (SILs) • Significant Monitoring Concentrations (SMCs) • PM Advance

  3. PM NAAQS – Signed Dec 14, 2012 • Revised annual PM2.5 standard by lowering level from 15 to 12 µg/m3 • Retained 24-hour PM2.5 standard at 35 µg/m3 • Retained existing (24-hour) PM10 standard - 150 µg/m3 • Retained existing secondary standards – 15.0 µg/m3 (annual) & 35 µg/m3(24-hour); no separate standard to protect visibility • Updated Air Quality Index (AQI) to be consistent • Initial attain/nonattain designations by Dec 2014; likely effective in early 2015 More info: www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/actions.html

  4. Revised annual PM2.5standard • Meeting annual standard of 12.0 μg/m3 will provide: $4 - $9.1 billion/year health benefits in 2020 = $12 - $171 return for each dollar invested in reducing pollution. • Estimated annual implementation costs: $53 - $350 million.

  5. Court decision: PM2.5Implementation Rule • NRDC, Sierra Club, ALA & Medical Advocates for Healthy Air challenged EPA’s 2007 Implementation Rule (IR) for 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS (& for 2008 NSR/PSD rule). • Jan 4, 2013 Court decision: CAA requires implementation of PM2.5 NAAQS (and NSR/PSD) under Title I, Part D, subpart 4rather than subpart 1. • Subpart 4: more specific than subpart 1 about what states must do to bring areas into attainment. Uses a two-tier classification system (Moderate and Serious).

  6. Court decision: PM2.5 Implementation Rule • Decision does not affect new (Dec 2012) annual PM2.5 standard, but will affect associated implementation rule. • Court remanded 2007 IR (& 2008 NSR/PSD) rules back to EPA to repromulgate pursuant to subpart 4, but did not vacate them or set deadline. • EPA assessing effect on pending SIP actions (e.g., NAA SIP submittals for 1997 & 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS) and on NSR actions.

  7. PM2.5 SILs and PM2.5 SMC • Under sec. 165(a)(3) of CAA, PSD permit applicant must show that emissions from proposed facility will not cause or contribute to air pollution > any max allowable increase for any pollutant, and must comply with the NAAQS. • Oct 20, 2010, EPA modified PSD rules: added PM2.5 max allowable increases in ambient pollutant concs (increments) & two screening tools (PM2.5 SILs and PM2.5 SMC) to reduce burden of AQ monitoring/modeling for permit applicants for projects with small AQ impacts.

  8. PM2.5 SILs and PM2.5 SMC • SILs & SMC provide exemptions to PSD permit applicants from certain PM2.5 preconstruction modeling and AQ monitoring. • SILs (Significant Impact Levels) – tool to evaluate impact of proposed/ modified major source on NAAQS or PSD Increment. If predicted AQ impacts < SIL, impact considered de minimis & cumulative modeling analysis not required. (Also used to evaluate modeled impact.) • SMC (Significant Monitoring Concentration) – tool to determine if a source must submit 1 year of pre-construction AQ monitoring data before building/modifying a facility. If predicted impact or existing data < SMC (4 μg/m3 (24-hour average)), considered de minimis. • Sierra Club claimed EPA lacked statutory authority and had not showed that PM2.5 SILs and SMC represent de minimisimpacts. Court vacated & remanded Oct 2010 PM2.5 SILs rule and vacated PM2.5 SMC rule.

  9. Draft guidance: PM2.5 SILs and PM2.5 SMC • March 4, 2013 - “Draft Guidance for PM2.5 Permit Modeling” Provides path forward for pending PSD permits that relied on PM2.5 SILs and SMC exemptions. • SMC – Don’t rely on PM2.5 SMC to avoid compiling AQ monitoring data. But, instead of PM2.5 monitors, applicants may submit PM2.5 ambient data from existing monitoring networks if representative of AQ. • SILs – Don’t rely on PM2.5 SILs to conclude that source will not cause/contribute to NAAQS violation, but permit authority may rely on SILs as partial support.

  10. Draft guidance: PM2.5 SILs and PM2.5 SMC • EPA is accepting comments on Draft Guidance through May 31, 2013. (comments to Bridgers.George@EPA.gov) • EPA will discuss comments at “2013 Regional, State, and Local Modeler’s Workshop” on April 22-25 in Dallas. EPA will then revise & release final version of the guidance.

  11. Impacts of court decision: SILs & SMC • PM2.5 SILs and PM2.5 SMC are not required elements in PSD SIP. Therefore, states can withdraw these parts of SIP submissions. • Decision does not preclude use of SILs for PM2.5 , but need more care using them to support conclusion that source won’t cause/contribute to NAAQS violation. • Sources with final PSD permits not likely to be affected as they were issued according to rules in effect at that time.

  12. PM Advance • Modeled after Ozone Advance Program • Promotes local actions to reduce PM2.5 & precursors in attainment areas to avoid nonattainment. • “Path forward” or “Action Plan” www.deq.state.va.us/Programs/Air/PublicNotices/AirPlansandPrograms.aspx • Path forward can be as simple as list of measures/programs & schedule for each.

  13. PM Advance • Participation should last for a period of five years or longer as needed/desired. • Program does not create or avoid regulatory requirements, but could result in state or federally (if approved into SIP) enforceable regulations. • Emission reductions could be accounted for in future SIP planning. • Grant/ funding opportunities: http://epa.gov/ozonepmadvance/resourcesPM.html

  14. Advance Program Participants • OZONE + PM - 32 areas in 20 states/8 EPA Regions (Regions 3-10) • PM advance: • Southwest Louisiana area - MPO • Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency • Minnesota • New England: Keene area, NH?

  15. For More Information… • PM2.5: Alison Simcox (617) 918-1684 simcox.alison@epa.gov • Permits (SILs & SMC): Donald Dahl (617) 918-1657 dahl.donald@epa.gov

More Related