190 likes | 201 Views
This document outlines the aerodynamic design process for a wing, including airfoil selection, lifting-line theory calculations, and drag estimation. It also discusses the criteria for airfoil selection and provides calculations for total lift and drag coefficients. The document concludes with future considerations for the wing design.
E N D
Aerodynamics PDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 21, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian
Aerodynamics PDR Design Process • Span-wise distribution for cl found using Lifting-Line Theory • Airfoil Selection • Drag Integration
Lifting-Line Theory • Wing modeled as distribution of horseshoe vortices • Fourier Series for circulation along span Inputs: a = dcl/da = 5.66 (airfoil specific) Constant Chord = 2.8 AR = 5 a = 6.85 deg (to match CL) (actually a - aL=0)
Prandtl’s Lifting-Line • Solve Prandtl’s wing equation • Substitute • System of N equations with N unknowns(Solve N N matix) • Take N different spanwise locations on the wing where the equation is to be satisfied: 1, 2, .. N; (but not at the tips, so: 0 < 1 < )
Lifting-Line For Rectangular Wing • Consider: rectangular wing: c = constant; span = b; b/c = A = 5 without twist: = constant; L=0 = 0 • Evaluate the wing equation at the N control points at i : • The wing is symmetrical A2, A4,… are zero • take only A1, A3,… as unknowns • take only control points on half of the wing: 0 < i /2 • Example for N=30: • take A1, A3, A5 as unknowns • take control points (equidistant in ): = /(2N) stepping • take lift-slope of the airfoil a0 = 5.66, and wing aspect ratio A = 5
Lifting-Line Calculation • Sample Output N = 3 • CL calculation from lifting line theory CL = πAR*A1*αCL = W/S*q = .4873 from constraint solve for a = 6.8 deg in order to match CL • CDicalculation • clcalculation
Lifting-Line Theory Outputs: CDi = 0.0131 Cdi distribution CL = 0.4873 Cl distribution Section Lift Coefficient Varies from ~ 0 – 0.6
Airfoil Selection Airfoils Selection Criteria: • Low drag over range of specified cl values • Easy construction • Round Leading Edge • Relatively Flat Bottom • Easy to construct on tabletop • Constructible Trailing Edge
Airfoil Selection Region of Interest Clark Y Clark Y Airfoil is Best
Clark Y Airfoil • Geometry • Drag Polar • cl vs a cl vs. a cd vs. cl dcl/da = 5.66
Total Lift and Drag Coefficient Estimation • Lift: • CL – Found at cruise, can be obtained at any a • cl - Found using lifting line theory • Drag: • CD = CDi + CDp • CDifound using lifting line theory, can be obtained at any a • From Drag Polar of airfoil (cl vs. cd), cdp can be obtained and integrated to obtain CDp for the entire wing
Parasitic Drag Calculation • Used Polynomial Function to Fit Airfoil’s Drag Polar
Parasitic Drag Calculation • Plugged wing cl distribution into polynomial function to get corresponding parasitic cd distribution along span
Parasitic Drag Calculation • Integrated Parasitic Drag Distribution Along Span to get 3-D Wing Parasitic Drag • CDp = .0059
Total Wing Drag Coefficient • CD = CDi + CDp • CD = .0131 + .0059 = .0190
Wing Characteristics Wing Sweep = 0º Taper Ratio = 1 Dihedral Angle = 5º AR = 5 S = 40 ft2 Tail Airfoil = NACA 0012 (empirically based from Roskam Part II, p. 154) (subject of future trade study)
Coming Attractions… • CLmax • Control Surface Sizing • Tail Sizing