1 / 13

Data mining in wireless sensor networks based on artificial neural-networks algorithms

Data mining in wireless sensor networks based on artificial neural-networks algorithms. Authors: Andrea Kulakov and Danco Davcev Presentation by: Niyati Parikh. Motivation.

justice
Download Presentation

Data mining in wireless sensor networks based on artificial neural-networks algorithms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data mining in wireless sensor networks based on artificial neural-networks algorithms Authors: Andrea Kulakov and Danco Davcev Presentation by: Niyati Parikh

  2. Motivation • Centralized data clustering in sensor networks is difficult, not scalable, limited communication bandwidth, limited power supply, data redundancy • Advantage of Neural Networks: demand of compressed summaries of large spatio-temporal data, similarity queries – finding similar patterns or detecting correlations • Unsupervised learning ANN perform dimensionality reduction or pattern clustering

  3. Adaptive Resonance Theory(ART1) Attentional subsystem F2 Category layer reset Orienting subsystem - F1 p Comparison layer + F0 Input layer Binary input

  4. Adaptive Resonance Theory(ART1) Attentional subsystem F2 Category layer Ti = | wi . x | reset B + | wi | Orienting subsystem - F1 p Comparison layer + F0 Input layer Binary input

  5. Adaptive Resonance Theory(ART1) Attentional subsystem F2 Category layer Ti = | wi . x | reset B + | wi | Orienting subsystem - F1 p Comparison layer | wi . x | + | x | F0 Input layer Binary input

  6. Adaptive Resonance Theory(ART1) Attentional subsystem F2 Category layer Winew = Ti = | wi . x | reset B + | wi | Orienting subsystem - F1 p Comparison layer | wi . x | + | x | F0 Input layer Binary input

  7. ART1 • Continue finding an F2 node until prototype matches the input well enough or else allocate a new F2 node • Capable of refining learned categories and finding new patterns • Value of p: higher the vigilance level, more specific clusters

  8. FuzzyART • Same as ART1, but replace intersection operator of ART1 with fuzzy set theory conjunction MIN operator ^ • ART1 and FuzzyART use complement coding – concatenate input pattern b with b’ or bi with (1-bi) • Look at the features consistently present or absent from a pattern

  9. Proposed architectures of sensor networks Clusterhead collecting all sensor data from its cluster of units

  10. One clusterhead collecting and classifying the data after they are once classified at the lower level

  11. Results

  12. Comparison • Tested data robustness – made one sensor defective • Architecture1: trained with p=0.93 and tested with p = 0.90 • Architecture2: trained with p=0.80 and tested with p = 0.70 • Architecture2 makes 0.75% classification error

  13. Future work • Applying ARTMAP and FuzzyARTMAP - supervised learning versions

More Related