1 / 33

Alex Bogacz

Linac and RLAs – Progress on NF-IDS. Alex Bogacz. 0.9 GeV. 244 MeV. 146 m. 79 m. 0.6 GeV/pass. 3.6 GeV. 264 m. 12.6 GeV. 2 GeV/pass. Linac and RLAs - Goals. IDS Goals: Define beamlines /lattices for all components Resolve physical interferences, beamline crossings etc

jweathersby
Download Presentation

Alex Bogacz

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Linac and RLAs – Progress on NF-IDS Alex Bogacz

  2. 0.9 GeV 244 MeV 146 m 79 m 0.6 GeV/pass 3.6 GeV 264 m 12.6 GeV 2 GeV/pass Linac and RLAs - Goals • IDS Goals: • Define beamlines/lattices for all components • Resolve physical interferences, beamline crossings etc • Error sensitivity analysis • End-to-end simulation (machine acceptance) OptiMvs ELEGANT • Component count and costing NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  3. RLA Acceleration - Status • Presently completed lattices • Linear pre-accelerator – solenoid focusing • 4.5 pass Dogbone RLA × 2 (RLA I + RLA II) • Optimized multi-pass linac optics (bisected - quad profile along the linac) • Droplet return arcs (4) matched to the linacs • Transfer lines between the components – injection chicanes • Droplet arcs crossing – Double achromat Optics design • Chromatic corrections with sextupoles at Spr/Rec junctions • Error analysis for the Arc lattices (proof-or-principle) • Magnet misalignment tolerance – DIMAD Monte Carlo Simulation • Focusing errors tolerance – betatron mismatch sensitivity • Piece-wise end-to-end simulation with OptiM (pre-accelerator + RLA I) NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  4. Linear Pre-accelerator – 244 MeV to 909 MeV Transverse acceptance (normalized): (2.5)2eN = 30 mm rad Longitudinal acceptance: (2.5)2 sDpsz/mmc= 150 mm 8 medium cryos 17 MV/m 6 short cryos 15 MV/m 11 long cryos 17 MV/m 2.4 Tesla solenoid 1.4 Tesla solenoid 1.1 Tesla solenoid NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  5. ‘Soft-edge’ Solenoid • Non-zero aperture - correction due to the finite length of the edge : • It introduces axially symmetric edge focusing at each solenoid end: • Hard edge solenoid: NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  6. ‘Soft-edge’ Solenoid – Nonlinear Effects • Nonlinear focusing term DF ~ O(r2) follows from the scalar potential: • Solenoid B-fields • Nonlinear focusing included in particle tracking NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  7. Pre-accelerator Optics – soft vs hard solenoids a = 19.5 cm a = 0 cm NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  8. Linac Optics – OptiM vs ELEGANT a = 19.5 cm a = 19.5 cm Yves Roblin NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  9. Linac Optics – OptiM vs Elegant Transverse acceptance (normalized): (2.5)2eN = 30 mm rad Longitudinal acceptance: (2.5)2 sDpsz/mmc= 150 mm Yves Roblin NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  10. Linac-RLA Acceptance Initial phase-space after the cooling channel at 220 MeV/c bx,y = 2.74 m ax,y = -0.356 bg = 2.08 NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  11. Introduction of synchrotron motion in the linac Longitudinal acceptance: Dp/p=0.17 or Df =93 (200MHz) NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  12. Linear Pre-accelerator – Longitudinal phase-space Transverse acceptance (normalized): (2.5)2eN = 30 mm rad Longitudinal acceptance: (2.5)2 sDpsz/mmc= 150 mm Transport efficiency: 0.996333 NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  13. Longitudinal phase-space tracking OptiM tracking Initial distribution ELEGANT tracking Preliminary Yves Roblin NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  14. Multi-pass Linac Optics – Bisected Linac ‘half pass’ , 900-1200 MeV initial phase adv/cell 90 deg. scaling quads with energy quad gradient 1-pass, 1200-1800 MeV mirror symmetric quads in the linac quad gradient NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  15. Multi-pass linac Optics – bisected linac 2-pass, 1800-2400 MeV minimized beta beating due to under focus 3-pass, 2400-3000 MeV NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  16. m- m- m+ m+ Injection/Extraction Chicane m+ m- NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  17. Re-injection double-chicane 0.9 GeV m+ 1.5 GeV m+ m- m- NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  18. Pre-accelerator–Chicane–Linac Matching a = 2×10-5 NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  19. Pre-accelerator–Chicane–Linac Matching a = 2×10-5 NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  20. Injection-to–Linac – Chromatic Corrections Dfxy = 1800 Dfxy = 1800 Dfxy = 1800 Dfxy = 1800 two families of sextupoles one family of sextupoles uncorrected NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  21. Linac ½-to-Arc1 – Beta Match E =1.2 GeV • Already matched ‘by design’ • 900 phase adv/cell maintained across the ‘junction’ • No chromatic corrections needed NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  22. Linac1-to-Arc2 – Chromatic Compensation E =1.8 GeV • ‘Matching quads’ are invoked • No 900 phase adv/cell maintained across the ‘junction’ • Chromatic corrections needed – two pairs of sextupoles NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  23. Linac1-to-Arc2 - Chromatic Corrections initial uncorrected two families of sextupoles NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  24. Mirror-symmetric ‘Droplet’ Arc – Optics (bout = bin and aout = -ain , matched to the linacs) E =1.2 GeV 2 cells out transition 2 cells out transition 10 cells in NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  25. ‘Droplet’ Arcs scaling – RLA I • Fixed dipole field: Bi =10.5 kGauss • Quadrupole strength scaled with momentum: Gi = × 0.4 kGauss/cm • Arc circumference increases by: (1+1+5) × 6 m = 42 m NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  26. Mirror-symmetric ‘Droplet’ Arc – Optics Arc1 (E =1.2 GeV) 10 cells in 2 cells out 2 cells out Arc2 (E =1.8 GeV) 15 cells in 3 cells out 3 cells out NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  27. Longitudinal Compression in the RLA • Adiabatic compression in the RLA - off-crest acceleration in the linac + non zero momentum compaction in the arcs (M56~6 m) NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  28. ‘Droplet’ Arcs scaling – RLA II • Fixed dipole field: Bi = 40.3 kGauss • Quadrupole strength scaled with momentum: Gi = × 1.5 kGauss/cm • Arc circumference increases by: (1+1+5) × 12 m = 84 m NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  29. RLA II - Linac Optics mirror symmetric quads in the linac 1-pass, 4.6 -6.6 GeV Quad gradient length NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  30. Focusing Error Tolerances – Quadrupole Spec • By design, one can tolerate Arc-to-Arc mismatch at the level of 1% (to be compensated by the dedicated matching quads). • For any given Arc and the following Linac one can evaluate: Fmin ≈1 m and • Thanks to well balanced, tight focusing in the Arcs and compact Spr/Rec optics the last number, 50 m, is factor of 6 smaller than the corresponding quantity for a typical CEBAF Arc-Linac segment. • This yields the required design specification for quadrupoles of 0.2%: NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  31. quadrupole misalignment errors (Gaussian): F:sx = sy= 1 mm sx‘ = sy‘= 0.8 ×10-3 D:sx = sy= 1 mm sx‘ = sy‘= 1.47×10-3 (sx,y' = sx,y/L) Magnet Misalignment Errors • Lattice sensitivity to random misalignment errors via DIMAD Monte-Carlo assuming: Arc 2 RMS Orbit Displacement [m]: X: 0.9486e-02 y: 0.7003e-02 • Orbit drifts at the level of ~3 cm can easily be corrected by pairs of hor/vert correctors (2 kGauss cm ) placed at every quad girder • Similar level of dipole misalignment errors had virtually no effect on random steering NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  32. Summary • Presently completed Lattices: • Pre-accelerator (244 MeV-0.9) + injection double chicane • RLA I (0.9-3.6 GeV) and RLA II (3.6-12.6 GeV) • 4.5 pass linac • Droplet Arcs1-4 • Chromaticity correction with sextupoles validated via tracking • Magnet error lattice sensitivity of Arc lattices • Magnet misalignment error analysis shows quite manageable level of orbit distortion for ~1 mm level of magnet misalignment error. • Great focusing errors tolerance for the presented lattice - 1% of Arc-to-Arc betatron mismatch limit sets the quadrupole field spec at 0.2% NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

  33. Summary – cont. • Piece-wise end-to-end simulation with OptiM/ELEGANT (transport codes) • Solenoid linac • Injection chicane • RLA I • Still to do… • End-to-end simulation with fringe fields (sol. & rf cav.) • Engineer individual active elements (magnets and RF cryo modules) • Element count and costing NFMCC Collaboration Meeting, Oxford, MS, January 14, 2010

More Related