1 / 19

Understanding and Predicting

Personal Navigation. Understanding and Predicting . Jaime Teevan , Daniel J. Liebling and Gayathri Ravichandran Geetha Microsoft Research. 33% queries repeated 73% of those are navigational [Teevan et al. SIGIR 2007]. (tomorrow @ 14:00). 7th. 33% queries repeated

kamala
Download Presentation

Understanding and Predicting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personal Navigation Understanding and Predicting Jaime Teevan, Daniel J. Liebling and Gayathri Ravichandran Geetha Microsoft Research

  2. 33% queries repeated 73% of those are navigational [Teevan et al. SIGIR 2007] (tomorrow @ 14:00) 7th

  3. 33% queries repeated 73% of those are navigational [Teevan et al. SIGIR 2007] Authors Tutorials New content: WSDM 2012 Attending Workshops to be held February 9-12 in Sponsors Conference Venue Seattle, WA. www.wsdm2011.org

  4. Road Map of Talk microsoftresearch • General Navigation • Identifying general navigation • Understanding general navigation • Personal Navigation wsdm • Identifying personal navigation • Compare with general navigation • Coverage and accuracy of prediction • Consistency of behavior over time • Bridging general and personal navigation Bing search logs 70 million queries 21 million users

  5. Road Map of Talk microsoftresearch • General Navigation • Identifying general navigation • Understanding general navigation • Personal Navigation wsdm • Identifying personal navigation • Compare with general navigation • Coverage and accuracy of prediction • Consistency of behavior over time • Bridging general and personal navigation Bing search logs 70 million queries 21 million users

  6. Identifying General Navigation • Ask people (“Were you looking for this site?”) • 1 in 4 queries reported to be navigational • Query string (wsdm.org or microsoft) • 10% of queries identified as navigational • Click behavior • Look for low click entropy • Need lots of data (query instances, users, clicks)

  7. Understanding General Navigation • Identified 390 general navigation queries • 12% of query volume • Query strings straightforward • facebook, youtube, myspace • Short (½ the length of typical Web queries) • Contain a URL fragment 20% of the time • Navigation target usually first result

  8. General Navigation Mistakes • Click predicted only 72% of the time • Double the accuracy for the average query • But what’s going on the other 28% of the time? • Many typical navigation queries not identified • craigslist • weather.com (people visit interior pages) (people visit related pages) 3% visit http://geo.craigslist.org/iso/us/ca 17% visit http://weather.yahoo.com

  9. Road Map of Talk microsoftresearch • General Navigation • Identify high quality common queries • Look navigational ≠ navigational • Personal Navigation wsdm • Identifying personal navigation • Compare with general navigation • Coverage and accuracy of prediction • Consistency of behavior over time • Bridging general and personal navigation Bing search logs 70 million queries 21 million users

  10. Road Map of Talk microsoftresearch • General Navigation • Identify high quality common queries • Look navigational ≠ navigational • Personal Navigation wsdm • Identifying personal navigation • Compare with general navigation • Coverage and accuracy of prediction • Consistency of behavior over time • Bridging general and personal navigation Bing search logs 70 million queries 21 million users

  11. Identifying Personal Navigation • Repeat queries are often navigational • The same navigation used over and over again • Was there a unique click on the same result the last 2 times the person issued the query? wsdm wsdm hongkong wsdm wsdm sheraton sigir wsdmcfp

  12. Understanding Personal Navigation • Identified millions of navigation queries • Most occur fewer than 25 times in the logs • 15% of the query volume • Queries more ambiguous • Rarely contain a URL fragment • Click entropy the same as for general Web queries • enquirer (multiple meanings) • bed bugs (found navigation) • etsy(serendipitous encounters) National Enquirer Cincinnati Enquirer Etsy.com Regretsy.com (parody) http://www.medicinenet.com/bed_bugs/article.htm [Informational]

  13. Personal Navigation Accurate • Target less likely to be ranked first .. • .. than target of general navigation • .. than the average Web search click • Nonetheless, prediction very accurate • Correct 95% of the time

  14. Prediction Consistent Over Time • Looked at different history intervals • How much do we need to know about a person? • Offline predictions? • Prediction accuracy consistent over time • Coverage decreases with stale history

  15. Road Map of Talk microsoftresearch • General Navigation • Identify high quality common queries • Look navigational ≠ navigational • Personal Navigation wsdm • Re-finding often navigational • Identify unusual navigational queries • High coverage and accuracy • Behavior consistent over time • Bridging general and personal navigation Bing search logs 70 million queries 21 million users

  16. Road Map of Talk microsoftresearch • General Navigation • Identify high quality common queries • Look navigational ≠ navigational • Personal Navigation wsdm • Re-finding often navigational • Identify unusual navigational queries • High coverage and accuracy • Behavior consistent over time • Bridging general and personal navigation Bing search logs 70 million queries 21 million users

  17. Bridging Personal and General • Some personal navigation queries are general navigation queries General Personal Accuracy of prediction: Personal Navigation 95% General Navigation 72% 12% 15% 5% Opportunity to combine aggregate and individual data to increase coverage and drop inaccurate general navigation

  18. Summary of Talk microsoftresearch • General Navigation • Identify high quality common queries • Look navigational ≠ navigational • Personal Navigation wsdm • Re-finding often navigational • Identify unusual navigational queries • High coverage and accuracy • Behavior consistent over time • General & personal navigation complementary An opportunity for personalization that works!

  19. Questions? Jaime Teevan, Daniel J. Liebling and Gayathri Ravichandran Geetha Microsoft Research

More Related