1 / 23

C. Lacasta, C. Mariñas, M. Vos IFIC-Valencia O. Brovchenko, Th. Muller, H.J. Simonis, T. Weiler

Thermal studies at Valencia and Karlsruhe. C. Lacasta, C. Mariñas, M. Vos IFIC-Valencia O. Brovchenko, Th. Muller, H.J. Simonis, T. Weiler IEKP-Karlsruhe Transparencies extracted partly from presentations at 2nd Int. Workshop on DEPFET detectors and Applications. Steady state simulation.

kamil
Download Presentation

C. Lacasta, C. Mariñas, M. Vos IFIC-Valencia O. Brovchenko, Th. Muller, H.J. Simonis, T. Weiler

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Thermal studies at Valencia and Karlsruhe C. Lacasta, C. Mariñas, M. Vos IFIC-Valencia O. Brovchenko, Th. Muller, H.J. Simonis, T. Weiler IEKP-Karlsruhe Transparencies extracted partly from presentations at 2nd Int. Workshop on DEPFET detectors and Applications

  2. Steady state simulation • DCDs always active: The hottest points • 2 Switchers active • 2 pixel stripes active • DCDs active: Solved with cooling blocks • 2 Switchers + 2 pixel stripes active: Very hot! Weneedtocooldownthe DCD Now, theproblemisthe SW • Thisis a personal estimationonpowerconsumption! Justqualitativelyresults! Weneedtoagreeonsomenumbersto do thisstudies! • Next more accuratesimulationis in progress, including real dimensions, materials.... • Preliminaryparameters are usedbetweengroupsinvolved in thermalissues (Karlsruhe and Valencia, regular meetings). Cross-checkbetweenmeasurements and simulationisontheway.

  3. Set up • Measurementsmadeon a smallmicrostrip detector. • Theheateris placed in themiddle of the sensor. • Pt100 resistancefortemperaturemeasurement • Dimensions 34x14 mm2 • Thickness 300 mm • Coolantcomingfrom a chiller • Desired T over a widerange

  4. Influence of conduction • Evolution of theswitcher, fordifferenttemperatures of thecooling blocks, as a function of powerdissipatedbythe chip. • Theslopeisalwaysthesame. Thedifferenceisthe offset. • Theinfluence of thecooling blocks in the center of the module isnot so big.

  5. Influence of convection We really need to blow the air!! • Evolution of thechip’stemperature, as a function of speed of air for 0,4 Watt of power. • The air flowingisaneffectivemechanismforcoolingthe center of the module. Forhigherpower, theeffectisevenbigger • Once the air isblowing, the T variesslow, independently of thespeed (at thisrange).

  6. The heat removal using the support bars • From C. Kiesling talk’s in Valencia, option number 1: • A bigthicknessisneededwiththis material (Al or Cu). • Gluingthesupportstructureunderneaththe module isnotpossibleduetothelack of space! But…

  7. Thermal studies of new materials • Replace the Al for synthetic diamond (H.J. Simonis) or TPG: could Very small transverse area

  8. First DEPFET thermal mock-up Switcher DCD 5 14 In mm 4 17 0.45 Module • Switchers • 6 switchers • Switched on/off sequentially • (0,1s ON/0,2s OFF) • 0.4 Watts each 110 • DCD’s • 1 heater on each end • Always powered on • 1.6 Watts each TPG 4 10

  9. Estimation of power consumption • SWITCHERS • Active: • Idle: • DCD • Always active: • Pixels • Active: • Comparison between real values and what I have used: It is not easy to achieve such a high power with the heaters!

  10. A more realistic approach… • Now the power disipated by the Switchers and DCD’s is bigger than before but half the expected value in the final module. • The contact with the cooling blocks is made by a couple of sheets of TPG. 500mm thick, 20 mm long and 17 mm wide. Overlap of 85mm2 underneath the balcony . Natural convection A bit more power Natural convection Lowpower • Switchers: 0,4 W • DCD: 1,6 W • The sensor is around 39ºC • Switchers: 0,8 W • DCD: 2 W • The sensor is around 50ºC Without air, thetemperature of the sensor increases a lot, evenwithpowershalfthe final ones.

  11. Not everything is lost… Blowing the air: • Conduction through the TPG to the cooling blocks. 500mm thick, 20 mm long and 17 mm wide. • Forced convection. Natural convection Forcedconvection • Switchers: 0,8 W • DCD: 2 W • Tair=20ºC; vair=5m/s • Temperature sensor=41ºC • Switchers: 0,8 W • DCD: 2 W • No air • Temperature sensor=50ºC Nowthesituationis more favorable

  12. Wehavetopumpout of the sensor a bigamount of power… butthere are severalthingsthatwe can do: • Decreasethetemperature of thecooling blocks tothelowervaluepossible. Is 7ºC or 8ºC achievable? Condensation? • Decreasethelengththattheheatmustcover. Isthere a possibilitytomovethesupportstructureclosertothe modules? Longer modules? • Decreasethetemperature of the air • Increasethe air flow • Introduce materialswithbetterthermalcoefficient First rough studies

  13. A couple of options • TPG • In-planethermalconductivity: 1550 W/mK (at 20ºC) • Out of planethermalconductivity: 20 W/mK (no matter! smallthickness) • Density: 2.15 g/cm3 • Wellstudied material: Alreadytested in ATLAS SCT • Verysoft material • CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition)-Diamond • In-plane and out of planethermalconductivity: 1800 W/mK (at 20ºC) • Density: 3.515 g/cm3 • Thethinnerthecheaper • Goodrigidity • “Cleaner” • Betterformechanicalstability?

  14. Test Setup in Karlsruhe

More Related