1 / 30

C. Ciocca, M. Cuffiani, G. Giacomelli

Position-momentum correlations in e + e - annihilations at 91.2 GeV. C. Ciocca, M. Cuffiani, G. Giacomelli. Definition of the variables Motivations Results Summary. B-E correlation functions in bins of q t , q l and q 0. 2. q 0 = E 1 – E 2 > 0. q t. 1.

karis
Download Presentation

C. Ciocca, M. Cuffiani, G. Giacomelli

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Position-momentum correlations in e+e- annihilations at 91.2 GeV C. Ciocca, M. Cuffiani, G. Giacomelli • Definition of the variables • Motivations • Results • Summary

  2. B-E correlation functions in bins of qt, ql and q0 ... 2 q0 = E1 – E2 > 0 qt 1 thrust axis ql

  3. ... as a function of Y and kt ; • Y: pair rapidity • kT : pair transverse momentum

  4. fit the correlation functions to the Yano-Koonin-Podgoretsky (YK) parameterization (see e.g.S. Chapman, J.R. Nix and U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C52 (1995) 2694) v is the source velocity as measured in the observation frame Riare source parameters as measured in the source rest frame (R0 measures the duration of particle emission) space-momentum correlations fit parameters depend on Y and kt

  5. If the production volume (source element) moves relative to the observation frame with velocity v along the event axis, then after the Lorentz transformation qlg(ql-vq0) q0g(q0-vql) the correlation function can be written in the form YK where the qi are measured in the observation frame, while Ri measure the source in the rest frame of the production volume. Study YYK = ½ ln[(1+v)/(1-v)] as a function of Y static source: weak position-momentum correlations if strong position-momentum correlations are present, then YYK YYK Y Y

  6. GIBS Phys. Lett. B 397 (1997) 30. NA49 Eur. Phys. J. C2 (1998) 661 WA97 J. Phys. G 27 (2001) 2325. PHOBOS subm. to Phys. Rev. C

  7. EHS/NA22 Z. Phys. C71 (1996) 405 Rl Y In H.I. data Rl and Rt are observed to depend on kt and Y

  8. DELPHI and L3 (unpublished) G. Alexander,Phys. Lett. B506 (2001) 45 mt = sqrt( kt2 + mp2 )

  9. Results of the YK 6-parameter fits C(qt,ql,q0)=N(1+le ) -Rt2qt2 -Rl2g2 (ql – vq0)2 –R02g2 (q0 –vql)2 same event and track selections as in Eur. Phys. J. C16 (2000) 423 inclusive sample (no two-jet selections) bin size = 40 MeV (NLIKE / NUNLIKE )DATA CEXP.= (NLIKE / NUNLIKE )JETSET

  10. qt < 0.12 GeV slope = 1/v legenda projections: |qother| < 0.12 GeV ql = q0/v g(q0 – vql) = 0 and g(ql – vq0) = ql/g small range in q0boost available for fitting, large uncertainty in R02

  11. Include long-range linear terms . C(qt,ql,q0)=N(1+le ) -Rt2qt2 -Rl2g2 (ql – vq0)2 –R02g2 (q0 –vql)2 . (1+ctqt+clql+c0q0)

  12. l v

  13. R02 Rl2

  14. Rt2

  15. Factorize the YK function into longitudinal and transverse terms fit the experimental C (qt < 0.12 GeV) to 5 parameter “longitudinal” YK function: C(qt,ql,q0)=N(1+le ) -Rl2g2 (ql – vq0)2 –R02g2 (q0 –vql)2 and the experimental C (ql < 0.12 GeV, q0 < 0.12 GeV) to 3 parameter “transverse” YK function: C(qt,ql,q0)=N(1+le ) -Rt2qt2

  16. 5 param fit 6 param fit

  17. 5 param fit 6 param fit

  18. 5 param fit 6 param fit

  19. v l

  20. Source rapidity YYK = ½ ln[(1+v)/(1-v)] as a function of pair rapidity Y (sum over all kt)

  21. R02 Rl2

  22. 6 param fit 3 param fit

  23. Rt2

  24. Further checks Edgeworthexpansion C=N(1+le )(1 + k H3 ( 2 Rq)/6) -R2q2 H3 (x) = x3 – 3x is the third-order Hermite polinomial Maximize likelihood function E-802 Collaboration, Phys. Rev. C66 (2002) 054906.

  25. Gauss vs.Edgeworth Dependence on Y at fixed Kt Dependence on Kt at fixed Y

  26. inclusive samplevs.two-jet events Dependence on Y at fixed Kt Dependence on Kt at fixed Y

  27. data/Jetset vs.data Dependence on Y at fixed Kt Dependence on Kt at fixed Y

  28. data (c2)vs.data (likelihood) Dependence on Y at fixed Kt Dependence on Kt at fixed Y

  29. weak dependence on kt sum over kt and study Rl dependence on Y 5 param. fit 6 param. fit

  30. Summary • The puzzle of negative R02 looks to have been solved; however, it seems difficult to get a value of the emission duration from YK fits. • Clean dependence of v on Y; Yano-Koonin rapidity scales approximately with pair rapidity. • There is some indication of a decrease of Rt and of Rl with increasing kt and at larger Y, even if systematics due to the fit choice are large. • Is this of some interest to the h.i. community ?

More Related