1 / 14

Board of County Commissioners Allen County, Ohio Detailed Planning Assessment Hearing

Early-Lutz Rd Sewer Improvement. Board of County Commissioners Allen County, Ohio Detailed Planning Assessment Hearing Wednesday, May 30 th , 2001. Presented By: Stephen M. Kayatin, Sanitary Engineer Ryan Rase, Business Manager. OVERVIEW OF TONIGHT’S MEETING. Meeting Objective

kass
Download Presentation

Board of County Commissioners Allen County, Ohio Detailed Planning Assessment Hearing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Early-Lutz Rd Sewer Improvement Board of County Commissioners Allen County, Ohio Detailed Planning Assessment Hearing Wednesday, May 30th, 2001 Presented By: Stephen M. Kayatin, Sanitary Engineer Ryan Rase, Business Manager

  2. OVERVIEW OF TONIGHT’S MEETING • Meeting Objective • History of the Project • Proposed Sewer Layout Alternatives • Statutory Procedure for Completion of Project • Cost to Property Owners 6. Alternative Financing Options 7. Tentative Project Schedules 8. Questions

  3. Meeting Objective This project consists of providing sewer service to approximately 92 property owners in an area consisting of Lutz Rd., Shearin Ave., Early Ave., and a portion of Berryhill Rd. This meeting will provide for public participation on the consideration of the detailed planning assessment for the area. Discussion items will include cost to develop plans, possible sewer line locations, tentative cost for construction and schedules.

  4. History of the Project There have been requests made to the Allen County Health Department to allow installation of on-lot treatment systems for new home construction. The requests are located within the general area of this project. The Allen County Health Department with the Sanitary Engineer made visual inspections of the drainage ditches. The visual inspections had concluded that the existing on-lot systems were performing poorly and ditch sampling/testing was needed. The Allen County Health Department and Sanitary Engineer have completed sampling and testing for the drainage ditches in the project area. On April 11th, samples were collected from 8 sites within the project boundary. On April 17th, the 8 sites were again sampled. The samples were then tested for Total Suspended Solids, Fecal Coliforms, Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), and Phosphorous. The results are shown on the following slide: On April 25th, 2001 a Detailed Planning Assessment (D.P.A.) Hearing was held at the Bath Township Hall. During the meeting, it became evident that the notices for the project had not been sent to each individual property owners. Therefore, after conferring with our legal counsel it was determined another D.P.A. Hearing would be needed to satisfy the Ohio Revised Code.

  5. Location #1 Location #2 Location #3 Proposed Sewer Layout Alternatives Proposed Gravity Sewer Project Boundary Shearin Ave. Early Ave.. Force Main Sewer Cairo U.S. 30 Lutz Rd. S.R. 65 ProjectArea Connection Lines 1, 2, and 3 Berryhill Rd.

  6. Statutory Procedure for Completion of the Project 1. Ohio Revised Code Chapter 6117 Assessment District: Statutory Procedure: A. Conduct Detailed Planning Assessment (DPA) Hearing. B. Legislation approving DPA. C. Complete construction plans. D. Finalize DPA costs, and mail billings to property owners. E. Conduct a Construction Assessment Hearing. F. Five day wait for written objections. G. Respond to all written objections. H. Commissioners consider resolution to proceed with construction. I. Ten day wait for filing of all appeals to Probate Court. J. Settle all appeals. K. Proceed to the construction of the project. L. Complete construction of the project. M. Finalize cost of construction and mail billings to property owners. N. Notify property owners to connect to project. O. Certify assessments to the tax duplicate of the property owners.

  7. DPA = $70,000.00 divided by 92 households = $760.87 per household Note: Assessment may be paid in cash or assessed with interest over five years. Principal Estimated DPA: Cost to Property Owners 1. Estimated DPA (Detailed Planning Assessment) DPA – 5 year assessment with interest: Engineering (Preparation of plans) $45,000.00 Soils $ 7,000.00 Permit to Install (OEPA) $2,000.00 Advertising $1,000.00 Note Interest $10,000.00 Contingency $5,000.00 Total DPA Cost $70,000.00

  8. CA = $897,700.00 divided by 92 households = $9,757.61 Note: Assessment may be paid in cash or assessed with interest over a 20 year period. Cost to Property Owners(continued) 2. Estimated CA (Construction Assessment) CA – 20 year assessment with interest: Construction Cost $657,000.00 Engineering (Administrative and Inspection) $ 80,000.00 Interest during construction $ 75,000.00 Miscellaneous (Easements, Permits, etc.) $ 10,000.00 Contingency (10% Construction Cost) $ 65,700.00 Bond Issuance (Legal) $ 10,000.00 Total CA cost $897,700.00 Principal Estimated CA:

  9. Cost to Property Owners (continued) 3. Miscellaneous Non-Assessed Cost to Property Owners a.) Abandonment of existing private sewage system/tanks and installation of a sanitary sewer lateral to the project. Approximate Cost - $1,000. b.) Once a property owner has connected to the sewer line he or she can will receive a quarterly sewer bill. The breakdown of the County rates are listed below:

  10. Cost to Property Owners (continued) 4. Total Estimated Annual Cost = Amortized CA + Annualized Sewer Billing = $800.00 + $300.00 = $1,100.00 per year or $92.00 per month

  11. Alternative Financing Options The majority of grant financing programs are structured to give assistance to low to moderate income service areas for the construction of a project. However, there are some grant funding programs that may be available for this project. An example of how a grant may affect the cost to the property owner is as follows: 25% Grant 75% Balance of project to be financed through quarterly debt service or assessments. Total Project Cost (Including DPA) = $967,700.00 Total Cost = $897,700.00 Grant = $224,250.00 Debt Service = $673,450.00

  12. Alternative Financing Options(continued) Monthly Amortized cost (using a 25% grant funding): Debt Service or Assessment $50.00 Monthly Sewer Bill $25.00 Total Monthly Cost $75.00 Total Annual Amortized Cost $900.00 50% Grant 50% Balance of project to be financed through quarterly debt service or assessments. Monthly Amortized cost (using a 50% grant funding): Debt Service or Assessment $37.00 Monthly Sewer Bill $25.00 Total Monthly Cost $62.00 Total Annual Amortized Cost $744.00

  13. Tentative Project Schedule With Grant Without Grant Informational Meeting 1/30/2001 1/30/2001 DPA Hearing 4/25/2001 4/25/2001 DPA Hearing #2 5/30/2001 5/30/2001 CA Hearing 11/28/2001 TBD Begin Construction 1/23/2002 7/20/2004 Complete Construction 7/31/2002 1/20/2005 Assessment Billing 9/22/2002 3/20/2005 Tax Certification 10/1/2002 10/1/2005

  14. Questions ??????

More Related