140 likes | 280 Views
IAS Satellite: Where the Tide Will Turn: How is Community Level Participation Most Effective in Turning the Tide ? Ashraf Grimwood , G Fatti, M Malahlela, E Mothibi Kheth’Impilo, South Africa. Context. South Africa is a MIC with LIC health outcomes Population of 50m, 5.6m HIV infected
E N D
IAS Satellite: Where the Tide Will Turn: How is Community Level Participation Most Effective in Turning the Tide?Ashraf Grimwood, G Fatti, M Malahlela, E MothibiKheth’Impilo, South Africa
Context • South Africa is a MIC with LIC health outcomes • Population of 50m, 5.6m HIV infected • Antenatal HIV prevalence 30% • Maternal mortality 310/100000 as @ 2009 • Neonatal mortality rate 14/1000 live births • Infant mortality 40/1000; <5 mortality rate 56/1000 live births • Unemployment officially 24% (reality 60%) • 70% rural children nutritionally challenged • One of the most obese nations in the world with high levels of violence/trauma • Largest HIV burden • Second highest TB incidence -948/1000 and 70% dually infected • Government launches the NSDA, re-PHC as well as NHI with an essential component being community systems & services strengthening besides HSS
Intervention South African NGO - founded in 2009 Vision: An AIDS Free Generation in our time Objectives: • To support the SAG achieve its goals for the scale up of quality services for the management of HIV/TB in the Primary Health Care sector as outlined in the National Strategic Plan, NHI & re-PHC. • Work in close partnership with the Health departments to provide comprehensive services for the management of HIV & TB in primary health care facilities. • Partner with other government departments to support the psychosocial needs of infected and affected families. • Strengthen community adherence & psychosocial support for improved HIV treatment outcomes through community health care workers or Patient Advocates- paid workers, on contract with benefits like all staff
Doctor • Nurse • Pharmacist • PMTCQuality Mentor • Social Worker • Data Quality Manager NATIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT OFFICE • CSC District Coordinator • CSC Trainer Roving SWAT TEAM PA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE PA • Site Facilitator PA PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTRE (Clinics) PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTRE (Clinics) • Site Facilitator • Site Facilitator PA PA PA PA PA PA AREA COORDINATOR Patient Advocate Support Structure
Methods Objectives: • Estimate effect of Clinic & Community Based Adherence Support on mortality, loss to follow up, & virological suppression in adults and children receiving ART. • Multicentre cohort analysis using routinely collected data. • ART naïve patients starting ART between Jan 2004 and Sep 2010 at 57 government ART sites in 4 provinces. • Patients categorised as receiving or not receiving CBAS from the start of ART. • Virological suppression (< 400 copies/ml) at six-monthly intervals until 5 years of ART, by intention to treat analysis. www.aids2012.org
Results • 66,953 adults included, 29.4% received community support. • Total observation time was 100,295 person-years • Deaths: 970 (4.9%) CBAS patients; 2,968 (6.3%) non-CBAS patients. (P < 0.0001) • LTFU: 1,185 (6.0%) CBAS patients and 4,498 (9.5%) non-CBAS patients. (P < 0.0001) • Virological suppression (at six months): -CBAS patients: 76.6% (95% CI: 75.8%-77.5%) -Non CBAS patients: 72.0% (95% CI: 71.3%-72.5%) (P < 0.0001) www.aids2012.org
Virological suppression by intention-to-treat on ART Proportions with virological suppression Months on ART www.aids2012.org
without PAs Mortality in adults with and without PAs with PAs logrankP < 0.0001 Months on ART
without PAs Loss to follow up in adults with and without PAs with PAs logrankP < 0.0001
Retention in care - children with and without PAs with PAs Adjusted hazard of attrition of patients with PAs: 0.57 (CI: 0.35–0.94) Retention in care without PAs logrank P = 0.027 3563 children included, 323 (9%) received community support
Mortality in children with and without PAs Corrected mortality without PAs Adjusted hazard of mortality of patients with PAs: 0.40 (CI: 0.15–1.06) with PAs logrank P = 0.060
Summary of effectiveness of community adherence support Adults Mortality: 35% reduction, aHR 0.65 (95% CI: 0.59-0.72) Loss to follow up: 37% reduction, aHR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.59-0.68) Virological suppression: After 6 months: 22% improvement, aOR 1.22 (95% CI: 1.14-1.30) After 5 years: 2.6 fold improvement, aOR 2.6 (95% CI: 1.6-4.4) Children: Mortality: 61% reduction, aHR 0.39 (95% CI: 0.15-1.04) Program attrition: 43% reduction, aHR 0.57 (95% CI: 0.35-0.94) Virological suppression: 60% overall improvement, aOR 1.60 (95% CI: 1.35-1.89)
Key considerations for Replication • The large-scale implementation of clinic linked community based adherence support programs is shown to improve survival and retention in care for adults & children receiving ART • Scale-up of these programs should be considered as a critical part of the clinical intervention & be linked & coordinated with the clinical program for greater community impact • Quality of service depends on ongoing didactic training, supervision, mentoring & support/debriefing of community workers • This intervention is community development in action through job creation & further career development
Acknowledgement THANK YOU This research was made possible by the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of grant no. P3121A0051 & Global Fund. The contents of the presentation are the sole responsibility of “Kheth’Impilo” and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.