150 likes | 281 Views
Trends in relative investment of energy in growth and/or reproduction by Peruvian hake Merluccius gayi peruanus from 1972 – 2004: an issue of length dependence. Presented by : Michael Ballón. Instituto del Mar del Peru, Project INCOFISH.
E N D
Trends in relative investment of energy in growth and/or reproduction by Peruvian hake Merluccius gayi peruanusfrom 1972 – 2004: an issue of length dependence Presented by: Michael Ballón Instituto del Mar del Peru, Project INCOFISH Authors: Michael Ballón, Claudia Wosnitza-Mendo, Arnaud Bertrand, Jacqueline Palacios, Humberto Olivera, and Renato Guevara-Carrasco
OVERVIEW Introduction Objective Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions
Introduction • Significance of hake • Distribution • Main factors that have affected the hake population • sardine and anchovy regime • El Niño • Overfishing 40 cm 25 cm • Current situation • New regulations (2002) were set up based on a single species approach (IMARPE) • The stock still far from recovery • Why?
Objective Hake physiological responses Main question: How has hake reacted physiologically to the fishing pressure and the physical environment? Clarifying the effects. Reducing uncertainty about: Natural Mortality and Recruitment Success
Materials and Methods Biological data: 52106 Female hakes sampled from 1971-2004 from Paita port Total body weight (W) Total length (L) Gonad weight (Wg) Stomach weight (Ws) Biological Indices Fulton's condition factor K = W.L-3 Gonadosomatic index GI = Wg.W-1 Fullness index FI = Ws.W-1 Physical environment and time Paita sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) Year-Month (YM) Time series (1971-2004) Condition factor Gonadosomatic index
Results and Discussion…time series Long term Upward trend in condition factor Downward trend in reproduction activity Short term Negative impact of El Niño In both: Fish condition and reproduction
Results and Discussion…? What are the factors that influence fish condition and maturation proccess?
Materials and Methods Biological data: 52106 Female hakes sampled from 1971-2004 from Paita port Total body weight (W) Total length (L) Gonad weight (Wg) Stomach weight (Ws) Biological Indices Fulton's condition factor K = W.L-3 Gonadosomatic index GI = Wg.W-1 Fullness index FI = Ws.W-1 Physical environment and time Paita sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) Year-Month (YM) Generalized Additive Model GAM (1980 -2004) Large hakes (35-50 cm)Small hakes (20-35 cm) Condition factor K according to GI+FI+SSTA+YM Gonadosomatic index GI according to K+FI+SSTA+YM
Better condition “Condition factor” More food Gonadosomatic index Fullness index Results and Discussion…GAM models Condition factor: K according to GI+FI+SSTA+YM Large hake (35-50cm) Small hake (20-35cm) During the spawning season there is a starving process. Fecundity depends more on the initial condition factor than on the food intake during the spawning season. Gonadosomatic Index: GI according to K+FI+SSTA+YM Starving Higher Fecundity Better condition
EL Niño + _ Results and Discussion… Large Large “Gonadosomatic index” “Condition Factor” Small Small SSTAnomaly SSTAnomaly Poor condition + spawning high mortality Large hake invest more energy in reproduction than small hake Large hake disappeared during the El Niño 1992-93 and 1997-98
Small hake (20-35 cm) “Condition factor” “Gonadosomatic index” RESULTS and DISCUSSION…long term Large hake (35-50 cm) ? “Gonadosomatic index” “Condition factor” Why small hake spent their energy reserves in reproduction and large hake do not, although the latter has a higher condition factor ?
RESULTS and DISCUSSION…long term Is this a density-dependent effect? • Low reproduction could be expected when biomass is close to the carrying capacity level • HOWEVER • hake biomass has been at a low level from the late 1990s onwards • Size at first maturity has reduced in the last decades (recovering SSB) • AND at the same time large hake has reduced reproduction activity • That is not a logical density-dependent effect
+ _ + _ + _ 2 cm 2 cm 2 cm RESULTS and DISCUSSION…long term 35 • Sex proportion from 80% males to 80% females • Lack of males for large hake ( >35 cm) • Low fertilization rate • Low stimulation for the spawning act Female proportion 25 Female propotion estimated from commertial landings Paita 20 Years