1 / 16

BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT

BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT. EUPAN/eGovernment WG O-P Rissanen Ministry of Finance. BPM in E-Gov <Objectives of the Study> <Research Methodology>. 04.05.2006 Vienna.

kentt
Download Presentation

BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT EUPAN/eGovernment WG O-P Rissanen Ministry of Finance

  2. BPM in E-Gov<Objectives of the Study><Research Methodology> 04.05.2006 Vienna Prof. Dr. Friedrich Roithmayr & Dr. René RiedlJohannes Kepler University LinzDepartment of Business Informatics – Information Engineering

  3. Motivation for e-government • Reduction in administrative costs Governmental budgets are decreasing Direct measurement of costs is possible • Increase in service quality and customer satisfaction Increase in citizens‘ and firms‘ requirements Quality and satisfaction are incapable of direct measurement - Measurement with questionnaires that represent a subjective rating - Measurement by the number of complaints

  4. Objectives of the study • Investigation of success factors and potential drawbacks for BPM in e-government • Identification of good and bad practices of reorganisation of government back office processes • Identification and systematisation of different business process management issues • Investigation of effectiveness and efficiency effects of business process management approaches • Giving recommendations for e-government decision makers in order to make e-government projects a success

  5. Research Methodology • Theory-driven methodology (development of a research framework) • Empirical approach (all evidence must be empirically based, that is, dependent on evidence that is observable by the senses) • Qualitative approach (involves the use of qualitative data – such as text from interviews or questionnaires – to understand and explain social phenomena) • Interpretive approach (access to reality – given or socially constructed – is only possible through social constructions such as language, consciousness and shared meanings) • Case-based approach (small sample size, but in-depth analysis) • Explorative research (generation of hypothesis/theory) • Data collection (web-based questionnaire, experts in the field of e-government projects, from February to April 2006)

  6. Research framework (basics) Success (Failure) of ane-government project Is X the cause of Y? If yes, what is the intensity of the effect?

  7. Measurement of thedependent variable (Y)

  8. Process effectiveness • The output of the process meets the requirements of the end customers • The output of every sub-process meets the input requirements of internal customers • The inputs from the suppliers meet the requirements of the process • Typical lack-of-process-effectiveness indicators are: • Unacceptable service quality • Complaints by citizens or firms • Backlog • Redoing completed work • Rejected output • Late output • Incomplete output

  9. Process efficiency • Cycle time per unit or transaction • Process time per unit or transaction • Wait time per unit or transaction • Transport time per unit or transaction • Resources (in monetary units, people, space) per unit of output • Process cost • Poor-quality cost per unit of output

  10. Business Process Management in E-Government A cooperation project between the Department of Business Informatics – Information Engineering at the University of Linz and the Austrian Federal Chancellery 04.05.2006 Vienna Prof. Dr. Friedrich Roithmayr & Dr. René RiedlJohannes Kepler University LinzDepartment of Business Informatics – Information Engineering

  11. Differences between non E-government projects and E-government projects E-government • requires a holistic view of the (government) organization, its culture, systems, processes and stakeholders. There is a dynamic and long term of process change. • requires a long term view and flexible planning due to the iterative and disruptive nature of the change process. • The success of an E-government project depends on the cooperation of stakeholders. Government strategy and E-Business strategy must be coupled Non E-government • requires (in theory) a holistic view of the organization, its culture, systems processes and stakeholders. Applications follow very slowly the theoretical concept. There is a short term of process change. • requires a short term view due to the change process. • requires a short term view due to the change process.

  12. Differences between non E-government projects and E-government projects E-government • poses a new challenge application independent (in terms of creation, maintenance, preservation, security, integrity and accessibility of records). • Speeding up business process and services are among the major motives for launching e-government projects. Business process improvement is the next step in e-government process management. Non E-government • poses challenges depending on the applications, • Process business improvement is an up growing motive in process management.

  13. Differences between non E-government projects and E-government projects E-government • Stakeholder interests effect the development of e-government projects. • In order to be successful, before a e-government project is launched, a through understanding and detailed inventoryof business processes, IT, skills, environmental situation is necessary. • Candidates for e-government projects are: • core business processes, • G2G processes, • G2B processes, • Cross functional business processes. Non E-government • Stakeholder interests are important but they don't effect the development of the e-projects. • In order to be successful, before a project is launched, a detailed inventory of business processes is necessary. • Candidates for e-business processes are: • processes for cost reducing; • processes increasing performance.

  14. Conclusion • Business process improvement is a good methodical approach for satisfying citizens expectations. • Business process improvement is a good methodical approach for cost reduction in E-government and for increasing efficiency. • Best case practices can help in spreading e-government concepts in the EU. • Develop an “E-government Process Index” (EGPI) • EGPI can help for determining priority and performance of individual processes • EGPI can help evaluating the E-government processes. • EGPI can help comparing E-government processes between different object (countries, applications, …) • EGPI can help in defining the IT-Strategy

  15. Contact Department of Business Informatics – Information Engineering Johannes Kepler University (JKU) Linz Altenberger Straße 69 4040 Linz, Austria

  16. Discussion • Is BPM a valuable methodology? • Are IT-departments key players? • Who should be responsible of the BPM projects? • Could BPM be a common interest for IPSG and eGov working groups?

More Related