1 / 13

Assessment in Early Childhood

Assessment in Early Childhood. Assessment in Early Childhood . For over 4 decades developmental psychologists have provided evidence from research indicating that early experience and early intervention have positive outcomes.

kerem
Download Presentation

Assessment in Early Childhood

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessment in Early Childhood

  2. Assessment in Early Childhood • For over 4 decades developmental psychologists have provided evidence from research indicating that early experience and early intervention have positive outcomes. • This research was the basis for Project Headstart in 1964, the authorization of the Handicapped Children’s Early Education Program (HCEEP) in 1968, and PL99-457 in 1986. Source: K Gerken, 2000

  3. Assessment in Early Childhood • Raimy & Raimy’s review of the research on the effectiveness of early childhood interventions resulted in their reporting their findings under six principles: 1. Developmental timing-interventions that begin earlier in development and continue longer usually have greater benefits. 2. Program intensity-more intensive programs with children and parents who actively participate produce greater positive effects. 3. Direct provision of learning experiences-direct educational experiences for children vs. parent training only result in greater and longer lasting benefits. 4. Program breadth and flexibility-comprehensive services via many approaches produce greater positive effects. 5. Individual differences-different programs may be needed to produce similar outcomes in children with different risk factors. 6. Ecological domain-adequate environmental supports are needed to maintain positive outcomes (Ramey and Ramey, 1998, pp. 115-118).

  4. Assessment in Early Childhood Three major reasons to assess infants and preschoolers: • Determine eligibility for special services/interventions • Evaluate effectiveness of intervention programs • To determine children’s readiness to enter school (academic and social readiness)

  5. Assessment in Early Childhood • Appropriate assessment is the framework for appropriate intervention. • There has been a shift from product oriented assessment to process oriented assessment along with naturalistic formats • Fewell (1991) believes that these types of assessment emerged from applied settings: adaptive assessment, arena assessment, ecological inventories, interactive assessment, and judgment-based assessment.

  6. Assessment in Early Childhood • Principles and Goals for Early Childhood Assessment (1998) • Assessment policies should be designed recognizing that reliability and validity of assessments increase with children’s age. • Assessments should be age-appropriate in both content and the method of data collection. • Assessments should be linguistically appropriate, recognizing that to some extent all assessments are measures of language. • Assessment should bring about benefits for children. • Parents should be a valued source of assessment information, as well as an audience for assessment results. • Assessments should be tailored to a specific purpose and should be reliable, valid, and fair for that purpose.

  7. Assessment in Early Childhood • The parents/guardians of the preschoolers must be an integral part of the assessment process from the beginning to the end, not passive sources of information or audience members for assessment results. • More attention must be paid to the diversity present in preschoolers, beyond linguistic differences and educators and other human service providers must understand and be responsive to diversity. • There must be program evaluations. • There must be attempts to link the interpretation and reporting of assessment information to intervention.

  8. Assessment in Early Childhood • Assessment Teams: • Unidisciplinary • Multidisciplinary • Interdisciplinary • Transdisciplinary (See Table 2 handout, Gerken, K. 2000)

  9. Assessment in Early Childhood(Guidelines) • Assessment must be done within the context of the family. • The assessor must be culturally competent. • The assessment process includes: • Child find/Case finding • Tracking • Identification/Screening • Diagnosis/Educational Planning

  10. Assessment in Early Childhood • How do you get where you need to go? • Assistive Technology and Adaptive Assessment • Informal Assessment • Interviews • Developmental scales and checklists • Curriculum-based assessment • Portfolio Assessment • Observation • Play-based assessment (Linder’s TPBA and TPBI, 1993ab)

  11. Assessment in Early Childhood • Functional Analysis/Assessment • Formal Assessment/Standardized Assessment • Neurobehavioral assessment • Intelligence/cognition • Motor Skills • Communication Skills • Adaptive Behavior • Social Development • Environmental Assessment • Assessment Systems

  12. Assessment Issues • Definitions • Family priorities • Limitations of the child and examiner • Limitations of the instruments

  13. Assessment Issues continued According to Salvia & Ysseldyke, there are three major problems in assessing infants and toddlers: • Performances of young children are variable and not good predictors of future behaviors. • Need to be cautious in reporting the results of readiness or developmental tests as level of current functioning. • The textbook authors report that a student must be labeled to be eligible for preschool services. However, we know that the 1997 reauthorization of IDEA allows a DD label up to age 9 and Iowa and many other states are using the term EI versus categorical labels for children.

More Related