1 / 9

Francesco Longo University of Trieste and INFN-Trieste After some discussion at Perugia meeting

Validation of G4: status, prospects & discussions. Francesco Longo University of Trieste and INFN-Trieste After some discussion at Perugia meeting (P.Boinee, R.Rando, R.Giannitrapani, J.Cohen-Tanugi) Analysis Group 02.06.2003. Setup for the study (F.Longo and J.Cohen Tanugi).

kiral
Download Presentation

Francesco Longo University of Trieste and INFN-Trieste After some discussion at Perugia meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Validation of G4: status, prospects & discussions Francesco Longo University of Trieste and INFN-Trieste After some discussion at Perugia meeting (P.Boinee, R.Rando, R.Giannitrapani, J.Cohen-Tanugi) Analysis Group 02.06.2003

  2. Setup for the study(F.Longo and J.Cohen Tanugi) • Standalone G4 tests use MC information to retrieve deflection angle between initial and final direction of an normally incident charged track. • Converting Volume is a Tungstene Slab: thin (0.105 mm) and thick (0.723mm) • Projected angle is computed as: arcsin(p_f.x()/p_f.mag()) • Test is to compare its distribution to Moliere formula (pdg 26.10), • 1 and 10 GeV mu and e-

  3. MCS status and developments • Note that G4 uses another model than Moliere theory • Discrepancy for muons at the 20-24% level in G4.5.1 • Contacts with G4 developers at CERN • Bug fix in G4.5.2 (ok for muons and protons) • For e-? G4 developers model fits well data on e- (low energy) could we give them more data? • Using the Moliere theory also for e-?

  4. G4 physics validation

  5. G4 physics validation Koi (SLAC)

  6. G4 physics validation

  7. G4 physics validation Preliminary (not released with G4 5.2)

  8. G4 validation for DC1 • Photon processes • Photoelectric, Compton, Pair production • Cross Section • Angular Distribution • Energy distribution • Charged particle processes • Ionisation • Landau, Bethe Bloch • Range, Stopping Power, Straggling • Multiple Scattering • Projected Angle, Energy dependence • Bremsstrahlung • Cross Section, Angular Distribution, Energy Distribution • Delta ray production • Energy distribution, Multiplicity • Positron Annihilation • Cross section • EM shower profile • Mizuno’s thesis confirmation

  9. G4Validation • Geant4 test and analysis • G4 comparison projects: • E.g. ATLAS • GLAST validation: • GEANT4TEST package in systests • Low level validation on “Gleam level” • High level comparison (Baloon, EM, test beam(s), …) • Requirements from Subsystems • Statistical methods?

More Related