1 / 12

Update on EarthCube: Past , Present, and Future

Update on EarthCube: Past , Present, and Future. Eva Zanzerkia, NSF. Why EarthCube ? To Advance our Science. ANT Glaciology. NCAR. Paleo-Climate. Petrology Geochemistry. Solar Terrestial. ANT Astro & Geospace. Tectonics. EAR Ed. Atm. Chemistry. Aeronomy. EarthScope.

knoton
Download Presentation

Update on EarthCube: Past , Present, and Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on EarthCube: Past, Present, and Future Eva Zanzerkia, NSF

  2. Why EarthCube? To Advance our Science ANT Glaciology NCAR Paleo-Climate Petrology Geochemistry Solar Terrestial ANTAstro & Geospace Tectonics EAR Ed. Atm. Chemistry Aeronomy EarthScope ANTEarth Sciences Phy. & Dyn Met. Geophysics Clm & Large Scale Dyn IES Magneto-spheric Phys. ARC Natural Sciences Hydrology ARC Sys Science (ARCSS) Geobio & Low Temp Geochem Sediment Geology and Paleobio ARC Obs. Network (AON) ARC Social Sciences EarthCube CI Geomomorphology & land use dyn PhysOcean Biological Infrastructure Envir. Biology ANTOcean & Atm. Sci. GeoPRISM OOI Software Emerging Frontiers (BIO) High Perf Computing OceanDrilling Biological Ocean Marine Geology & Geo-phys Networks OCE ED ANTOrganisms & Ecosys. Chem Ocean Data

  3. Goals for Our Science • Maximum outcomes from our investments (human, financial, etc) • Increased dialog and collaboration • between CI and GEO domains • among stakeholders – a very broad category (researchers, educators, industry, policy-makers, int’l , etc) • A systematic approach determined by the community • Creating Value; Mitigating Harm; Stability and Agility

  4. The EarthCube Strategy DataOne CUASHI Unidata • The process must • Engage all stakeholders: Geosciences end-users • Geosciences and CI facilities • CI and Computer Science specialists • Build EarthCube iteratively, with community input and assessment in yearly intervals • EarthCube built on existing resources, understanding that different geosciences communities are cannot be uniformly served NCAR IEDA IRIS OOI

  5. 2011 2012 Timeline First DCL • Accelerating the Community Dialog • Defining the initial scope of EarthCube • New starting point for collaboration • Developing convergence/consensus • Forming recommendations for development • Examining governance Road maps Stakeholder Survey EAGERs/WS 10/12 8/12 9/12 6/11 8/11 11/11 2/12 6/12 6/12 Wrap-up PI Workshop Website to Community FirstCharrette • White Papers SecondCharrette • > 10 sessions/talks EarthCube related • More community dialog opportunities 12/12 12/12 10/12 Domain Workshops EarthCube Solicitation

  6. This is not the End EarthCube designed in a step-wise fashion to accommodate needs, change and new developments. Next Opportunities Next Opportunities Community Assessment Community Assessment YEAR 1 YEAR 3 YEAR 2 10 Years

  7. 2013: Thematic Focus • Representative Group • Outreach/ Engagement • Consensus • Planning • Science Drivers • User Requirements • Domain Consensus • Cross-domain Consensus • Standards • Sustaining / creating collaborations • Governance • Community Engagement • Resource Leveraging • Architecture • Technical Scope • Explore Possibilities • Engage best ideas • Accommodate tech evolution • Integration • Domain and technical collaboration • Serving a broader community • Building blocks of EarthCube

  8. EarthCube Implementation • Amendment I- March 26 deadline • Test Enterprise Governance • EarthCube Research Coordination Networks • Amendment II • Building Blocks • Conceptual Designs

  9. Test Enterprise Governance • Two stages • planning • demonstration • Welcome all interested organizations to apply • Open competition, looking for the best ideas • engaging academic geoscientists and data facilities • setting priorities and fostering collaboration • Anticipate one award, but leaving options open depending on proposals

  10. Research Coordination Networks • Planning activity for Geosciences communities • shared resources • scientific goals to be advanced through CI • data/CI standards • Multi-disciplinary is preferred • Not designed to plan proposals

  11. Funding Opportunities • EarthCube solicitation (Dec. 2012) First deadline: March 26, 2013 • S2I2 conceptualization: 13-511 Full Proposal Deadline Date: Feb. 4, 2013 • Exploiting Parallelism and Scalability (XPS)13-507 Full Proposal: Feb. 20, 2013 • Expeditions in Training, Research, and Education for Mathematics and Statistics through Quantitative Explorations of Data (EXTREEMS-QED)12-606 Full Proposal: Jan. 31, 2013 • Core Techniques and Technologies for Advancing Big Data Science & Engineering:  (BIGDATA) 12-499 Expected new opportunities in FY 2013 • Cyber-Enabled Sustainability Science and Engineering  (CyberSEES) 13-500Full Proposal: Feb. 5, 2013

  12. Earthcube@nsf.gov Questions and/or Comments

More Related