1 / 12

1(4.89). Reform Faculty Evaluation Process

1(4.89). Reform Faculty Evaluation Process. Streamline and Simplify it No Annual Evals in Dossier Years Electronic Dossier System Senate Interface with Faculty Evaluation Task Force Student Evaluations of Teaching On-line

kreeli
Download Presentation

1(4.89). Reform Faculty Evaluation Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1(4.89). Reform Faculty Evaluation Process • Streamline and Simplify it • No Annual Evals in Dossier Years • Electronic Dossier System • Senate Interface with Faculty Evaluation Task Force • Student Evaluations of Teaching On-line Ad hoc Committee reporting to EC and Senate to include all senators serving on the Faculty Evaluation Task Force and regular reports from the FETF sub committees

  2. 2(4.68). T/TT Faculty Salaries • Equity-Parity • Gender Equity study • Salary inversions • Summer pay • Masters Courses pay • Vote on Welfare Committee’s Plan Charged to Faculty Welfare Committee (review Masters Course pay and reintroduce Comprehensive Faculty Remuneration Plan (Salary) Senate Task Force to review gender equity this semester

  3. 3(4.31). Restoration of Tenure Rights • Restore Full Tenure Rights in the Handbook for ALL Tenured Faculty • Input into financial Exigency Policy Senate Task Force on the Restoration of Tenure Rights

  4. 4(4.26). Policy on Shared Governance • Clearly define “Shared Governance” • Have a clear process and stick to it • Make Faculty Senate a more powerful voice in college policy making • Have mechanism to say “no” to bad policies • Evaluate Administrators (get qualified and accountable people in positions of Authority) Charged to Rules Committee

  5. 5(4.04). Senate RTP Process & Structure Role of Senate RTP Restructure? Department Guidelines vs. RTP Expectations Ad Hoc subcommittee reporting to Rules to include former members of the Senate RTP Committee.

  6. 6(3.99). Workload • Class Size Charged to Instructional Resources Committee

  7. 7(3.91). Address Communication Issues • Lack of Transparency at top levels • Distrust at all levels • “The PR Machine” Charged to Senate Diversity Committee along with similar issues identified in the Climate Surveys

  8. 8(3.82). Mechanism for Faculty Interface with IT • Defining IT’s role in academic mission • Systematic faculty input into IT planning • Better information sharing on update and downtime schedules • Properly trained IT professionals • Greater freedom and access to existing IT resources for faculty • Greater access to external resources at the college (ex. e-mail forwarding) Ad hoc Committee reporting to EC and Senate to include STAC and SITEC members

  9. 9(3.82). Policy on Differentiated Workload • Formulate Policy and Vote • Define Program Directors Charged to Faculty Welfare Committee

  10. 10(3.79). Policy for Addressing HR Issues • Definition of HR’s role at academic institution (“Incompetent” HR -> Faculty “Slaves”) • Training and evaluation of HR staff • Complaint protocols Ad hoc sub committee reporting to Academic Policies

  11. 11(3.78). Address Climate Survey • Follow up on Climate Survey • Address issues with Policy • Make Data Available to everyone Charged to Senate Diversity Committee

  12. 12(3.70). Comprehensive Grade Policy • +/- Grading • Update Policy on “Permanent F” • Review “last grade standing” • Issues with CAPP reports (Ds and Fs) Charged to Senate Academic Policies Committee

More Related