1 / 28

Sweet potato viruses and their effects on production

Viral metagenomic analysis of sweet potato using high-throughput deep sequencing Student: Thulile Faith Nhlapo Supervisors: Dr. J. Rees, Prof. M.E.C Rey, Dr. D.A. Odeny Collaborators: Ms J. Mulabisana, Dr. M. Cloete. Sweet potato viruses and their effects on production.

kreeli
Download Presentation

Sweet potato viruses and their effects on production

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Viral metagenomic analysis of sweet potato using high-throughput deep sequencingStudent: Thulile Faith NhlapoSupervisors: Dr. J. Rees, Prof. M.E.C Rey, Dr. D.A. OdenyCollaborators: Ms J. Mulabisana, Dr. M. Cloete

  2. Sweet potato viruses and their effects on production • Sweet potato is highly nutritious and is used as a poverty alleviation crop (food security) • Good source of carbohydrates, proteins, fiber, iron, vitamin C, B, and Vitamin A (beta carotene) • Viral diseases can reduce crop quality and yield by up to 100% • A collection of viruses may infect sweet potato (disease complex) • In SA 12 viruses have been identified either occurring singly or in combination (viral synergy) decreasing yield by 50-100% “Potential infection” Healthy Viral Infection/diseased

  3. Sweet potato virus families • Compared to viruses of other agriculturally important crops, sweet potato viruses have been poorly studied but recently more viruses infecting sweet potato are being described • Over 30 sweet potato viruses have been identified and assigned to 9 families • 7 RNA virus families have been identified: Bromoviridae, Bunyaviridae, Closteroviridae, Comoviridae, Flexiviridae, Luteoviridae, and Potyviridae • 2 DNA virus families have been identified: Caulimoviridae, Geminiviridae

  4. Symptoms associated with viral infection Symptoms observed on sweet potato plants in the field (A&B) chlorotic spots with purple rings, (C) upward curling of leaves, (D) insect damage. Symptoms observed in the glasshouse (A) chlorotic spots with purple rings, (B) chlorotic spots with purple rings, and purple edged vein feathering, (C) upward curling of young leaves, (D) chlorotic spots and vein clearing.

  5. Metagenomics and viral metagenomics? • Metagenomics-“or community genomics, is an approach aimed at analyzing the genomic content of microbial communities within a particular niche” • Viral metagenomics- the study of viral communities. Viral metagenomics can be used to analyse viral sequences in any sample type (soil, plant, water, human gut etc.) • Is a powerful tool for virus discovery, can be applied to the problem of determining etiology in diseases • Also a metagenomic study or analysis is not biased towards culturable organisms; therefore the total genetic diversity of microorganisms can be studied

  6. Using next generation sequencing approach for metagenomics Viral metagenomics-viruses small genomes, so assembly not a problem Bioinformatic- developed software and algorithm for analysis of short reads

  7. Aims • To carry out a metagenomic study of sweet potato viruses in the Western and Eastern Cape provinces of South Africa • To undertake genetic characterisation of sweet potato viruses under South African conditions in order to generate a basis for their classification • Explore diagnostic strategies using next generation sequencing (NGS)

  8. Overview of metagenomics strategy Input Symptomatic & Asymptomatic leaves Sampling DNA Isolation RNA Isolation RCA Sample preparation Nextera Sample preparation Ribo-Zero&TruSeq Output Data Analysis-CLC Bio Sequencing-MiSeq

  9. Overview of bioinformatics strategy Sequence Reads (Raw Data) 1. Download reference sequences (NCBI) 2. Trim reads for adaptors 2. Read map to reference viral genomes (0.8-0.99 stringency) De novo assembly (25-64 k-mer) Unmapped reads 3. Extract new consensus sequence BLASTn 4. Retrieve full genomes of most closely related species 6. Pairwise Comparison- Sequence ID 8. Full genomes 5. Multiple Sequence Alignment BLASTn 7. Phylogenetic tree Identify contigs CLC Bio 6.0.1- Plug-ins for additional alignments- MUSCLE and ClustalW 9. Design primers MEGA 5.05 10. Confirm by PCR

  10. Sweet potato sampling sites N Sample size= 20 Western Cape Symptomatic Eastern Cape Asymptomatic

  11. RESULTS

  12. Rolling circle amplification (RCA) provides DNA sequencing template • Genomic DNA (gDNA) isolation - Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit • Rolling circle amplification (RCA) -IllustraTMTempliPhi 100 Amplification Kit • Nextera DNA sample preparation • Sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq Benchtop Sequencer M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 10Kb 3Kb 1Kb RCA products for Eastern Cape samples DNA isolation of symptomatic and asymptomatic plants collected from the Eastern Cape

  13. Results: DNA data, symptomatic samples Western Cape sample (KT10): Sequence identity and percentage genome coverage of DNA circular viruses and mitochondrial DNA

  14. Example of mapping and coverage-KT10 Reads mapped to SPLCSPV-ZA (94 % similarity) Reference New consensus

  15. Neighbour-joining tree of geminiviruses

  16. Ribo-zeroed total RNA provides sequencing template for RNA sequencing • Total RNA isolation - Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit • DNase treatment of samples prior to sequencing • rRNA depletion- Ribo-ZeroTM Magnetic Kit (Plant Leaf) • TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Sample Preparation • Sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq Benchtop Sequencer M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 M 10Kb 3Kb 1Kb RNA isolation of symptomatic and asymptomatic plants collected from the Eastern and Western Cape

  17. Results: RNA data, symptomatic samples • 1% of data mapped to viral genomes • Majority of reads mapped to sweet potato chloroplast genome • Assembled near complete genomes of: • Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (RNA 2 segment) (SPCSV) • Still need to assemble RNA 1 segment (Total genome size = 17 630nt) • 3 593 reads out of 5 432 520, consensus length 4 811bp, 61 X average coverage • Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV) • Ordinary-strain • Common-strain (Sweet potato virus C) (SPVC) • Sweet potato virus G (SPVG)

  18. Summary of results for RNA viruses

  19. Mapping sequence reads to SPFMV reference genome Consensus length= 10 694 bp Average coverage= 255 X Reference New consensus

  20. New consensus shares 94% similarity with reference (variation)

  21. ZOOM-in

  22. Neighbour-joining tree of criniviruses (SPCSV) EA WA Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus isolates: WA- West African strain EA-East African strain

  23. Neighbour-joining tree of potyviruses (SPFMV, SPVC, SPVG) EA & O S SPFMV lineage C Sweet potato feathery mottle virus isolates: EA-East African strain S-S strain C-Common strain G-Sweet potato virus G 2-Sweet potato virus 2

  24. Sequence data suggests multiple infection Observed symptoms on sweet potato plants. (A1) Purple ringspots and chlorotic spots on KT10 sample, these symptoms are associated with Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV). (A2) Upward curling of leaves associated with Sweet potato leaf curl virus (SPLCV). (B) Upward curling of leaves and chlorotic spots on sample KF1, symptoms associated with SPLCV and SPFMV. (C) Purple ringspots, leaf vein feathering with purple feathering and chlorotic spots on sample F11, these are symptoms associated with SPFMV and Sweet potato virus G (SPVG). (D) Chlorotic spots and vein clearing on sample K17, symptoms associated with Sweet potato virus C (SPVC), the C strain of the potyvirus SPFMV.

  25. Sweet potato virus distribution • SPFMV (O-strain) • SPCSV • SPLCSPV-ZA • SPMaV-ZA Western Cape Eastern Cape SPVG • SPVC (SPFMV C-strain)

  26. Advantages of this sequencing approach? • Detect viruses by direct sequencing • Generate complete/near complete viral genomes • High average sequence depths • Deep sequencing is efficient diagnostic tool • Detected viral pathogens • Detected mixed infections • Detected diverse viral strains

  27. Acknowledgements • Supervisors • Dr. J. Rees • Prof. C. Rey • Dr. D. Odeny • Collaborators • Julia Mulabisana • Dr. M. Cloete • ARC-VOPI senior researchers, technicians, and staff • Sidwell Tjale • Thakhani Ramathavhatha • Dr. Laurie • ARC-BTP senior students, researchers and bioinformaticians • Farmers in Western and Eastern Cape • This work is based on the research support in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa  (Grant reference number UID 79983) • Other funding sources: ARC-PDP and DAFF

  28. THANK YOU

More Related