1 / 35

MSmcDESPOT

MSmcDESPOT. A look at the road behind and ahead October 30, 2009. The Technique. mcDESPOT (multi-component driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1 /T2) is a quantitative MR technique that characterizes many of the key parameters relevant to MRI

kyran
Download Presentation

MSmcDESPOT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MSmcDESPOT A look at the road behind and ahead October 30, 2009

  2. The Technique • mcDESPOT (multi-component driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1/T2) is a quantitative MR technique that characterizes many of the key parameters relevant to MRI • A series of spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) and phase-cycled steady-state free precession (SSFP) scans are collected at different sets of flip angles • The signal from a single voxel across all these scans is modeled as the combination of two different pools of water, a fast and slow pool in exchange with each other • A fitting algorithm (stochastic region of contraction) computes the optimal set of parameters that characterizes the observed signal at each voxel in the brain

  3. The Technique • The final result is a set of 10 maps defining MR parameters throughout the entire brain: • Fast pool T1, T2, and residence time • Slow pool T1 and T2 • Single pool T1, T2, and M0 – this is when we do not model each voxel as the sum of two pools • B0 off-resonance • Fast volume fraction – this is how much each pool contributes to a voxel’s signal or alternatively, what fraction of a voxel is occupied by each pool • We attribute the fast pool to water trapped between the lipid bilayersof the myelin sheath, while the slower-relaxing species is believed to correspond to the less restricted intra- and extracellular pools • This needs further histological verification but we will continue under this premise • Thus we rename the fast volume fraction to the “myelin water fraction” (MWF), our key parameter of interest

  4. The Study • Given this technique which we believe can characterize myelination in the brain, we move our sights to examine a disease that is characterized by demyelination: multiple sclerosis • 23 normals + 2 pending • 25 MS patients, 5 in each of 5 classes (low-risk CIS, high-risk CIS, RR, SP, PP) • Each scanned at 1.5T to avoid B1 inhomogeneity and assumed flip angle inaccuracy: • mcDESPOT protocol at 2mm3 isotropic • 32-direction DTI sequence at 2.5mm3 • T2/PD FSE at 0.43mm2 in-plane and 6mm slice resolution • FLAIR at 0.86 mm2 in-plane and 3mm slice resolution • MPRAGE pre and post Gdconstrast for patients at 1mm3

  5. Preprocessing for mcDESPOT • Prior to running the fitting algorithm, we must run the SPGR and SSFP images through a preprocessing pipeline • All the following steps are achieved using the FMRIB Software Library (FSL) • Throughout this presentation, we will focusing our attention on a single SPMS patient, affectionately known as P025

  6. Preprocessing mcDESPOT – Step 1 • Linear coregistration with trilinear interpolation (FSL FLIRT) – so that each voxel across all the images is the same piece of physical tissue

  7. Preprocessing mcDESPOT – Step 2 • Brain extraction from skull (FSL BET) – to reduce computation time

  8. Preprocessing DTI – Step 1 • Similarly, the diffusion weighted images must also be coregistered for eddy current correction and brain extracted

  9. Preprocessing DTI – Step 2

  10. Processing • Now that the data is all prepared, it is run through the parameter fitting program • The mcDESPOT volumes are processed with our own code • The diffusion volumes are fitted with FSL’sdtifit

  11. mcDESPOT Maps

  12. mcDESPOT Maps - MWF

  13. DTI Maps Fraction Anisotropy Mean Diffusivity

  14. Postprocessing • Postprocessing involves bringing these various maps and scans into a standard space so that they can be compared with each other on a voxel per voxel basis • We use the 2mm2 MNI152 T1 standard space template and the 1mm2 FMRIB58 FA map, an average of FA maps from 58 subjects, each nonlinearly registered to the MNI brain

  15. Postprocessing – mcDESPOT • The mcDESPOT coregistration target for each subject is nonlinearly registered to the MNI brain and this warp field is in turn applied to the 10 maps • The warp field is found with FSL’s FNIRT using an 8mm3 warp resolution

  16. Standard Space Reg. – SPGR Target • MNI MNI152 2mm mcDESPOT SPGR Registration Target

  17. Postprocessing – DTI • The DTI FA map for each subject is nonlinearly registered to the FMRIB58 map • Alternatively, we could register it to the mcDESPOT target and use the already computed warp field

  18. Standard Space Reg. – FMRIB58 FA

  19. Standard Space Reg. – DTI FA

  20. Postprocessing – Clinical • Each clinical scan for each patient is linearly registered to the mcDESPOT target • Then the target->MNI warp is applied

  21. Analysis • Whole brain MWF, z-score based thresholding • Would like to move onto tissue-specific MWF study, particularly in these types: WM, GM, NAWM (normal-appearing white matter), NAGM, and lesions only • This brings us to the tricky issue of segmentation

  22. Current Issues – Segmentation • Lesion segmentation is proving to be a very difficult task • Ultimately we’d like to use the lesion mask to subtract from our other tissue classifications to produce “normal-appearing” tissues • Here’s some pictures of our results so far using FSL’s FAST with a variety of channels (SPGR, FLAIR, T2, PD)

  23. Clinical-MPRAGE

  24. WM Segmentation – SPGR 3 class

  25. WM Segmentation – SPGR 4 class

  26. WM Seg. – SPGR-FLAIR 4 class

  27. GM Segmentation – SPGR 3 class

  28. GM Segmentation – SPGR 4 class

  29. Lesion Segmentation – SPGR 3 class

  30. Lesion Seg. – SPGR-FLAIR 3 Class

  31. CSF Segmentation – SPGR 3 Class

  32. CSF Seg. – SPGR-T2-PD 3 class

  33. Segmentation Questions • What is the best way to obtain a lesion mask? • Should we do operations on the masks we have, like subtracting the out-of-brain CSF from the SPGR-FLAIR 3 class CSF mask? • Are there other existing tools out there for either automatic or semi-manual lesion segmentation?

  34. Statistical Study • We intend to use the Wilcoxon rank sum test as our workhorse for statistical comparison • Many of our variables are not intrinsically Gaussian so the t-test and ANOVA do not seem applicable

  35. Open Questions • DTI registration to standard space: FMRIB58 or via SPGR mcDESPOT target? • Patient matching: gender or age first? • How to deal with lesions across patients: Vrenken approach is to replace missing data with the mean of the group

More Related