1 / 11

NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards and Security

NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards and Security. James J. Cimino, M.D. Co-Chair, HL7 Vocabulary Technical Committee Department of Medical Informatics Columbia University. Selection Criteria for Message Standards. Is there loss of information? Does it employ high-quality terminologies?

kyrene
Download Presentation

NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards and Security

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards and Security James J. Cimino, M.D. Co-Chair, HL7 Vocabulary Technical Committee Department of Medical Informatics Columbia University

  2. Selection Criteria for Message Standards • Is there loss of information? • Does it employ high-quality terminologies? • How can the government support the standard?

  3. Questions for SDOs - General • Is there active participation by all interested parties? • What evaluations have been done?

  4. Questions for SDOs - Data Quality • Does it alleviate duplication of data capture? • Is there a data model that considers all users?

  5. Reference Information Model has 1 1 has is_scheduled_by 1 1 is_requested_by has_as_ 0..1 a_contact Patient ambulatory_status_cd has 1 is_target_of 0..1 0..1 birth_order_amt is_a_role_of living_arrangement_cd participates_in 1 living_dependency_cd 1 has 1 multiple_birth_ind has newborn_baby_ind is_source_for 0..1 is_involved_in organ_donor_ind 1 0..* has_as_primary_facility preferred_pharmacy_id has_a_primary_provider 0..* has 1

  6. Reference Information Model 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 has 1 1 Patient ambulatory_status_cd 1 1 has birth_order_amt is_scheduled_by 1 1 living_arrangement_cd 1 1 is_requested_by has_as_ 0..1 0..1 living_dependency_cd a_contact multiple_birth_ind newborn_baby_ind organ_donor_ind has 1 1 preferred_pharmacy_id is_target_of 0..1 0..1 0..1 0..1 is_a_role_of has 1 1 1 1 participates_in 1 1 1 1 1 1 has is_source_for 0..1 0..1 1 1 0..* 0..* has_as_primary_facility has_a_primary_provider 0..* 0..* has 1 1 1 1 effective_dt pertains_to return_to_work_auth_dt termination_dt 1 1 0..* 0..* unable_to_work_effective_dt 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

  7. Reference Information Model

  8. Questions for SDOs - Data Quality • Does it alleviate duplication of data capture? • Is there a data model that considers all users? • What criteria are used for selecting terminologies?

  9. Principles for Adoption of HL7-Compliant Terminologies 1. The terminology must be compliant with the semantics of the HL7 structures 2. The terminology provider must be willing to participate in HL7-sanctioned interoperability efforts 3. There must be an organization committed to the timely maintenance and update of the terminology 4. Appropriateness of cost will be a consideration. (see “Principles for HL7-sanctioned Terminology Integration Efforts) 5. The terminology must be free from excessive license fees, yet HL7-sanctioned interoperability efforts must not jeopardize the business model of the terminology provider (see “Principles for HL7-sanctioned Terminology Integration Efforts) 6. The terminology should be comprehensive for the intended domain of use 7. Regulatory circumstances may require the adoption of specific terminologies. The use of such terminologies, provided that they are consistent with principle #1 above, shall not be considered a deviation from the HL7 standard

  10. Transactions • Alerts and Reminders • Exchange of Logic and Guidelines

  11. Additional Comments • Should there be criteria for terminologies? • Keep your eye on the doughnut

More Related