1 / 54

ESTREMO/Wide Field Monitor: scientific requirements for GRB physics and cosmology

ESTREMO/Wide Field Monitor: scientific requirements for GRB physics and cosmology. Lorenzo Amati (INAF - IASF Bologna, Italy) with contributions from:

lacy-holden
Download Presentation

ESTREMO/Wide Field Monitor: scientific requirements for GRB physics and cosmology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ESTREMO/Wide Field Monitor: scientific requirements for GRB physics and cosmology Lorenzo Amati (INAF - IASF Bologna, Italy) with contributions from: N. Auricchio, S. Campana, E. Caroli, L. Colasanti, A. Corsi, G. Cusumano, M. Feroci, A. Galli, B. Gendre, G. Ghirlanda, C. Labanti, M. Marisaldi, L. Piro, J.B. Stephen, G. Tagliaferri, J.J.M. in ‘t Zand

  2. Outline • minimum requirements for the use of GRBs as beacons for WHIM X-ray spectroscopy • extended requirements for GRB physics • requirements for use of GRBs as cosmological standard candles • other possible reuirements and present/future GRB experiments • brief review of GRB cosmology and science with focal plane instruments

  3. Main goal of WFM : detect and localize ( ~ 1-3 arcmin) at least 30 GRBs /year bright (beacons for WHIM, etc.) Minimum requirements forWFM Basic WFM concept, with minimum performances and impact Weight, volume, power, electronics, OBDH, simplicity and other constraints Enabling technologies (CZT, SDC+scint., improved super-agile, other), state of art, know how and expertise Improved WFM design and trade off between different technologies (CZT, SDC+scint, improved super-agile, other) Desirable and new, (with respect to present and forseen experiments) scientific goals for GRB science Desirable requirements from X-Ray Transients WG GRB science with X-ray telescope and focal plane instruments GRB science with ESTREMO

  4. Use of GRB as cosmological beacons: minimum requirements for the WFM

  5. GRBs as beacons for WHIM study Structure simulation from Cen & Ostriker (1999)  Simulations of WHIM absorption features from OVII as expected from filaments (at different z, with EW=0.2-0.5 eV) in the l.o.s. toward a GRB with fluence=410-6 as observed with ESTREMO (in 100 ksec). About 10% of GRB (10 events per year per 3 sr) with ~ 4106 counts in the TES focal plane detector

  6. Based on TES resp. and eff. simulations • S = GRB afteglow fluence in 2-10 keV in 60s < t < 60 ks • 2eV res. S=4e-6 erg cm-2 1eV res. S=4e-6 erg cm-2

  7. Minimum requirements for WFM design • FOV at least 3 sr (~1/4 of the sky) • source location accuracy of 1-3 arcmin for a 15-20 s source • energy band ~20-200 keV (where S/N for typical GRBs is optimal) • energy resolution: not important

  8. Baseline: coded mask instrument • fraction of coded mask that is open: 50% • coded mask area 4 times detector area • detector plane and mask connected by four passive shields • significance needed for source location accuracy of 1-2 ‘ : 15 – 20 sigma (based on discussion with hardware people) • CZT and SDC+scint have been proposed for the detectors, but also different concept proposed (e.g. by Feroci et al.)

  9. Assumptions: GRB spectral shape and rate • smoothly broken power-law spectra typically described by the empirical Band function with parametersa= low-energy index, b= high-energy index, E0=“roll over” energy • Ep = E0 x (2 + a) = peak energy of the nFn spectrum • low (~600 km ) Earth equatorial orbit (e.g. BeppoSAX) -> GRB occurrence rate: ~300/year in the full sky • GRB/XRR/XRF ratios (based on HETE-2): 1/3,1/3,1/3

  10. Assumptions: background • HEAO-1 diffuse background (CXB) from Grueber et al. (1997) • internal background: depends on mass and volumes distributions of the detectors and satellite structure -> will need MC simulations. • for these preliminary estimates, scaled from internal BKG of BeppoSAX WFC in 2-28 keV and PDS/GRBM at energies >30 keV)

  11. requiredafterglow 2-10 keV fluence (60s < t < 60 ks) > 4 x 10-7 erg/cm2 and a FOV of ~3 sr

  12. ->afterglow 2-10 keV fluence (60s < 7 < 60 s) > 3 x 10-7 erg/cm2 ->20-200 keV prompt fluence > 2.5 x 10-6 erg/cm2(~35-40%) (based on correlations between afterglow 2-10 keV flux at 11hr and prompt emission X-ray and gamma-ray fluences)

  13. Preliminary estimates of minimum 20-200 keV effective area • assumed typical 25s long GRB with spectrum :a = -1 , b = -2.5 and E0 = Ep = 200 keV • required 15 s significance in 10 s integration time, in order to localize the source with at least 3’ accuracy and start to slew • this corresponds to a required 20-200 keV 5s sensitivity in 1 sof 2.5x10-7 erg/cm2/sor 2.3 ph/cm2/sor ~700mCrab • computation of effective areas (in cm2) performed for different n of units / FOV: #units [fov] 1 [3 sr] 2 [1.5 sr] 4 [0.75 sr] 6 [0.5 sr] Eff. Area of each unit 300 220 180 160 NOTE: assumed f_mask = 0.5

  14. reducing the FOV is not an dvantage, as expected given that in 20-200 keV the CXB is not the main component of the BKG and that we are talking of very bright sources ! • -> number of units driven by other design requirements (e.g. maximum number of pixels for each detecting unit, payload volume and mass distributions, need to cover a 3sr FOV including the telescopes FOV, etc.)

  15. Improved GRB science requirements: extending WFM energy band down to a few keV

  16. extending down to a few keV increases trigger sensitivity

  17. few keV low energy threshold allows a better determination of the spectral parameters (Swift/BAT is very sensitive but with an energy band 15-150 keV -> 80% of time averaged spectra can be fitted with simple power-laws !) • Ep -> very important for GRB physics and cosmology (discuss later) and understanding nature of XRFs (GRB/XRF unification)

  18. Based on GRB X-ray logN-logS BeppoSAX, 70% of GRBs have a 2-10 keV fluence > 10-7 erg/cm2/s

  19. Preliminary estimates of minimum 2-20 keV effective area for sensitive study of X-ray emission of normal GRB with 2-10 keV fluence > 10-7 erg/cm2 (~70% of GRBs) • assumed typical 25s long GRB with spectrum :a = -1 , b = -2.5 and E0 = Ep = 200 keV • required 10 s significance of2-20 keVtime integrated counts , in order to perform sensitive spectral continuum analysis • this corresponds to a required 2-20 keV 5s sensitivity in 1 s of~2.2x10-8 erg/cm2/s or ~1.8 ph/cm2/s or ~500 mCrab #units [fov] 1 [3 sr] 2 [1.5 sr] 4 [0.75 sr] 6 [0.5 sr] Eff. Area of 1 unit 390 220 135 100 NOTE: assumed f_mask = 0.5

  20. 2 – 3 keV at most is unavoidable if want to check the real existence of transient absorption/emission features detected by BeppoSAX

  21. more stringent requirements are needed for detection and study of transient X-ray absorption features in 2-10 keV • GRB990705 was a very bright event, the edge was very deep but it was detected only at ~3s c.l. and was detected only in the first 13 s • evidences of transient local nH in 2 other bright events (GRB030329 and GRB000528) and a possible transient absorption feature in GRB011211 (X-ray rich) • to make a sensitive search of these features, confirm BeppoSAX results -> require at least 10 s significance in 2-10 keV in 10 s for normal GRBs with fluence • energy resolution of ~5% at 6 keV would be very good

  22. Preliminary estimates of minimum 2-10 keV effective area for detection and study of transient X-ray absorption features in normal GRB with 2-10 keV fluence > 10-7 erg/cm2 (70%) • assumed typical 25s long GRB with spectrum :a = -1 , b = -2.5 and E0 = Ep = 200 keV • required 10 s significance of2-10 keVin 10 s • this corresponds to a required 2-10 keV 5s sensitivityin 1 s of6.x10-9 erg/cm2/sor0.8 ph/cm2/sor~250 mCrab #units [fov] 1 [3 sr] 2 [1.5 sr] 4 [0.75 sr] 6 [0.5 sr] Eff. Area of 1 unit 1400 800 450 320 NOTE: assumed f_mask = 0.5

  23. required energy resolution at energies < 10 keV can be achieved with existing technology (e.g. SDC, CZT)Simulation of the transient (13 s) absorption feature in GRB990705 (a bright GRB) as would by a CZT based detector, 3 mm thick, 400 cm2, FOV = 0.5 energy resolution of 5% at 6keV GRB990705 (Amati et al., Science, 2000) simulation

  24. Extending down the low energy allows detection, study and use of X-ray rich GRBs and in particular of X-Ray Flashes (XRFs)

  25. Specific Requirements for XRFs • weak and soft events, with Ep < 20 keV • correlation between XRF peak flux and Ep • need high sensitivity in the 2-20 keV energy band, especially if thinking of triggering in this energy band • enough statistics to estimate Ep -> very important for test of spectral energy correlations (see next) -> GRB physics and cosmology • have enough statistics to detect and localize XRFs, thus allowing fast pointing with NFIs for afterglow search and study (if off-axis events -> late afterglow onset) • HETE-2 -> 60% of XRFs have a 2-30 keV fluence > 1.5x10-7 erg/em2 -> 2-20 keV fluence > 1.2x10-7 erg/cm2

  26. Preliminary estimates of minimum 2-20 keV effective area for detection of sensitive spectral study of XRFs with 2-20 keV fluence > 1.2x10-7 erg/cm2 (60%) • assumed typical 25s long XRF with spectrum :a = -1 , b = -2.5 and E0 = Ep = 15 keV • required 10 s significance in 2-20 keV in 10 s • this corresponds to a required 2-20 keV 5s sensitivity in 1 s of8.2x10-9 erg/cm2/s or 0.8 ph/cm2/sor 200 mCrab #units [fov] 1 [3 sr] 2 [1.5 sr] 4 [0.75 sr] 6 [0.5 sr] Eff. Area of 1 unit 1900 1100 600 425 NOTE: assumed f_mask = 0.5

  27. Requirements for the cosmological use of GRBs as “standard candles” : extending to 1 MeV the WFM energy band for accurate estimate of Ep

  28. spectral-energy correlations: Ep,i-Eiso, Ep,i-Eg, Ep,i-Eiso-tb, Ep,i-Liso-T0.45

  29. use of the Ep,i-Eg and Ep,i-Eiso-tb correlations for the estimate of cosmological parameters, in a way similar to SN Ia Ghisellini et al., NCIM, 2005 Ghirlanda et al.,ApJ, 2004

  30. use of the Ep,i-Eg and Ep,i-Eiso-tb correlations for the estimate of cosmological parameters, in a way similar to SN Ia Ghisellini et al. 2005

  31. Requirements: spectral-energy corr. • due to the broad and smooth roll-over that characterizes GRBs spectra, the estimate of Ep can be significantly affected by detector’s energy band (“data truncation effect”) and sensitivity as a function of energy • indeed, in several cases, for simultaneously detected events, BATSE (25-2000 keV), BeppoSAX (2-700 keV), HETE-2 (2-400 keV), Swift/BAT (15-350 keV) and Konus-Wind (15-5000 keV) provide significantly different values of Ep ! • if the energy band is not large enough, a fit with the Band function does not allow to constrain all the parameters and often a cut-off power-law is adopted (e.g. for HETE-2 and Swift/BAT)

  32. The Future of Cosmology with GRBs: Requires 1) Larger sample (only 3-5 over 13 (out of 51) GRBs with z, Ep from Swift in ~ 2yr) 2) Higher accuracy in measuring spectral parameters (e.g. below 10% on average, though flux-dependent) 2) Calibrate the correlations Instrumental energy band Lower energy extension:  detected # of bursts (down to few keV) (agrees with present pop studies) Upper energy extension: accuracy of spectral parameters (up to ~ MeV)

  33. A “minimal” Simulation 150 Fake GRBs 1) C-SFR (Porciani & Madau 1999) 2) F(L) (e.g. Firmani 2004) • Bursts satisfy the Ep-Eiso correlation (within its scatter) • Bursts satisfy the Ep-Eg correlation (withing its scatter) • Detectability: Fluence > 10-7 erg/cm2 in 2-400 keV (assuming a typical GRB spectrum) • Average parameter uncertainties: Fluence  10% Ep  20% Tb  20% The simulated sample has a peak energy distributed beteew 2keV and 1MeV Ghirlanda et al. 2006 A&A

  34. Ghirlanda et al.2006 A&A Ghirlanda et al. 2006 JOP Review, GRB Special Issue

  35. TEST on instr. energy range extension: The detection sensitivity is maximal for bursts with Ep within the instrumental energy range E. We should expect that for Ep  E (spec. param) is inversely related to E 43 GRBs with Ep=[25,200] keV 127 GRBs with Ep=[5,200] keV 150 GRBs with Ep=[2,1000] keV  (Ep)=60% , (F)=30%  (Ep)=40% , (F)=20%  (Ep)=20% , (F)=10% E1 = 15 – 300 keV E2 = 2 – 300 keV E3= 2 – 1000 keV Cosmological constraints are dominated by number of events and precision on parameter estimates

  36. Vary param. Uncert. by a factor 2 Vary #of GRBs by a factor 2

  37. Reasonable possible configurations • unique instrument with energy band from a few keV up to ~ 300-400 keV -> good number of Ep estimates but low accuracy in estimate of Ep (40%) and fluence (20%) • low energy instrument (from a few keV up 100-200 keV, few arcmin localization capabilites through mask) +high energy instrument (from ~20 keV to ~1 MeV , collimated or omnidirectional) -> optimal number of Ep estimates and high accuracy in estimate of Ep (20%) and fluence (10%) • performed estimates of required effective area in 2-20, 20-200 and 200-700 keV by considering a soft, average and hard GRB, respectively • accurate estimates of Ep for GRBs with 2-400 keV fluence > 3x10-7 erg/cm2

  38. Low energy detector (e.g. 2 – 150 keV): preliminary estimates of minimum 2-20 keV effective area for sensitive study of X-ray emission of normal GRB with 2-400 keV fluence > 3x10-7 erg/cm2 • assumed typical 25s long soft GRB with spectrum :a = -1.5 , b = -2.5 and E0 = 100 keV (Ep = 50 keV) • required at least 15s significance of2-20 keVtime integrated counts , in order to perform sensitive spectral continuum analysis • this corresponds to a required 2-20 keV 5s sensitivity in 1 s of~6x10-9 erg/cm2/s or ~0.75 ph/cm2/s or ~220 mCrab #units [fov] 1 [3 sr] 2 [1.5 sr] 4 [0.75 sr] 6 [0.5 sr] Eff. Area of 1 unit 2000 1250 650 450 NOTE: assumed f_mask = 0.5

  39. high energy detector (e.g. 30 – 1000 keV) • omnidirectional or weakly collimated (no imaging required -> no mask) scintillator detector (NaI, CsI, BGO, etc.) units with thousends cm2 area could do the job • e.g. half BATSE/LAD – like detector (NaI, 1000 cm2) would allow to estimate Ep with 20% accuracy for most 70% GRBs with Ep in the 100-600 keV energy range and 2-400 keV fluence > 5x10-7 erg/cm2 • smaller misaligned units in orther to optimize efficiency as a function of source detection, could be an alternative

  40. Other possible requirements for the WFM and present/future GRB experiments

  41. Other possible requirements: polarization • emission mechanisms: mainly sinchrotron -> polarization • but not ordered magnetic field -> should dump the detectable degree of polarization; but relativistic beaming effects -> a low degree (10-20%) towards the observer • detected in optical afterglow (lin., 1-3%); in X/gamma rays ? (there was a claim, not confirmed by re-analysis) • simulation performed for a CZT based detector, 5 – 10 mm thick, polarization > 20-30% should be detectable at least for the 1-2 brightest event in a year (CZT hardware people)

  42. Other possible requirements: timing • GRBs power spectra do not provide particurlarly relevant information • most efforts have been done on light curve variability, by defining different parameters for variability • most interesting uses: correlation between variability and peak luminosity -> redshift estimators • very recent developments: introduce a time variability parameter in spectral energy correlation -> improved cosmological use of GRBs • a time resolution of 1 ms would fit these requirements

  43. Summary of scientific requirements for WFM • FOV = 3 - 4 sr, 1 – 6 modules • other: 1-10 ms timing, 10-20% lin. pol.

  44. Main present GRB experiments • Swift: 15-150 keV, poor continuum determination, fits with power-law, Ep only in 20% cases, not much sensitive to XRFs, no X-ray features • HETE-2: 2-400 keV, XRFs, no detection of X-ray features (because of sensitivity of WXM worse than beppoSAX/WFC ?), low sensitivity at > 200 keV -> fits mostly cut-off power-laws • Konus/Wind : > 15 keV, no X-ray features, not much sensitive to XRFs, Ep determination for most events (but not disseminated because very slow ) • Suzaku/WAM: 50 keV – 5 MeV, no X-ray rich and XRFs, starting to provide reliable Ep estimates

  45. Some foreseen GRB experiments • AGILE and GLAST (2006, 2007) : study of GRBs up to tens or hundreds of GeV; miss low energy X-ray band, could complement measurements of ESTREMO/WFM is still operating after 2015 • ECLAIRs (2011-2016) : spectral study of prompt emission in 1-300 keV and optical observation of prompt emission • Lobster-ISS (2010-2014) : spectral study of GRB in the 0.3-500 keV enegy band (but probably with a gap between 3 and 15-20 keV)

  46. Further GRB science and cosmology with the ESTREMO X-ray telescopes

  47. New X-ray cosmology with GRB • Study the evolution of metals & star formation with z • Identify high-z GRB and their obscured host galaxies (X-rays and gamma-rays pierce through) at z=7-20 when the first stars & galaxies formed

  48. X-ray absorption in the GRB local environment X-ray absorption column densities in the afterglow: NH=1021-22 cm-2 (Stratta et al 2000, Campana et al 2006) Consistent with NH in Giant Molecular clouds

  49. Expected distributions Galaxy (cumulative) MC (differential)

  50. Cumulative distributions KS test: MC: 0.65 Galaxy: 10-11 (incl. Upper limits)

More Related