230 likes | 441 Views
National Treasury. 2. Interdepartmental task team: work agenda. Social assistance grants
E N D
1. 1 Social security and retirement reform Andrew Donaldson2008 Seminar on Proposals for Social Security and Retirement Reform September 2008
2. National Treasury 2 Interdepartmental task team: work agenda Social assistance grants – minimum benefits financed on budget
Design of new social security contributory arrangements
Basic pension
Extended unemployment benefits
Survivor and disability benefits
Social security governance and system framework
Enrolment ? Collection ? Account administration ? Fund management ? Payment of benefits
Coordination of administrative agencies and systems
SARS, UIF, Compensation funds, Guardian’s Fund, GEPF…
Possible “clearing house” partnership with private funds administration
3. National Treasury 3 IDTT work agenda (cont) Regulatory reform of retirement fund industry
Preservation, portability
Mandatory savings – standard provisions
Proposals for a fund accreditation framework
Disclosure and control of costs
Governance standards
Links between employment, wages and social security
Wage subsidy or cross-subsidy options
Tax treatment of retirement contributions and funds
National health insurance
Complementary social insurance reforms
RAF reform, occupational health and safety
4. National Treasury 4 Social security in context of anti-poverty strategy
5. National Treasury 5 Macro-fiscal context SA savings rate too low to sustain rapid growth
Redistribution through fiscus needs to be complemented by improved household saving and investment
Poverty reduction on budget is under strain because of inadequate progress with employment creation and income-generating activities
Social security reform faces difficult choices about priorities and trade-offs:
Elderly vs family benefits
Challenge of extending survivor benefits in presence of high mortality rates
In social security design – risk benefts vs saving for retirement
Wage or social security subsidy faces trade-off against other priority spending areas
6. National Treasury 6 Social security, employment and economic development … A dynamic modern economy needs protection of workers, not of jobs…
Stiglitz
Can income protection be orthogonal to job security ?
If social protection is organised industrially, then income security is correlated with job security
Retirement provision and social security arrangements vary by sector and occupational group
Limited income security:
Inhibits skills and business development in construction, hospitality trades
Holds back mobility out of agriculture
Disadvantages career progression of women
Dependence-crowding in low income households inhibits accumulation and household advancement
Social security and incomes policy require careful alignment of incentives and benefit structures
7. National Treasury 7 Complementary forms of income protection Redistribution through fiscus
- Progressive tax structure
Non-contributory social assistance
Collective administration
Public social services
Either universal or means-tested
Social grants
Education, health
Pooling of funds
- Contributory social security
Occupational benefits
Standard entitlements
Unemployment insurance
Group life
Savings
- Benefits depend on contributions
Benefits are funded
Individual entitlement to benefits
Work-related participation in system
Can be voluntary or mandatory
Influenced by tax treatment
Can function outside of the fiscus, underwritten by private funds
Provident & pension funds
Collective investment schemes
8. National Treasury 8 Inequality, redistribution and risk pooling
9. National Treasury 9 Redistributive pooling – non-contributory “first pillar” Reform in progress:
Raise means test thresholds
Raise CSG qualifying age to 15
Equalise Old Age Grant qualifying age for men and women
Cost implications:
Raise means test thresholds: up to R2 billion a year
Extend child grants to 15: about R1.5 billion a year
Lower SOAG age threshold for men to 60: R2 billion a year
10. National Treasury 10 Social security design issues Basic contributory pension arrangement
Savings 10-12 % of earnings
Defined benefit based on indexed lifetime earnings
Annuitisation at standard community rate
Extent of coverage, earnings floor for contributions
Mandatory participation in national fund, or default national fund and opt-out of accredited schemes
Risk benefits (unemployment, disability and survivors):
5-6 % of earnings, up to present UIF threshold (R150 000 pa)
Extension of unemployment insurance – minimum benefit or employment guarantee; links with labour centre initiatives
Scope for coordination and alignment of disability and survivors arrangements (Compensation funds, disability and chronic illness assessment, Guardian’s Fund, bargaining council and provident fund trustee responsibilities)
Collection by SARS, through PAYE system
Requires individual contributor accounts to be maintained
Based on standard definition of remuneration
11. National Treasury 11 The preservation dilemma Many social security and retirement systems aim to achieve “preservation” of savings – so as to ensure that people achieve an adequate replacement rate at retirement
Misperception that preservation will be imposed despite existing rights of access to funds has gained currency – in fact the direction of reform is to ease the tax burden on withdrawals
For low income households, mandatory full preservation is impractical and not optimal: urgent household needs may be more important than security of retirement income
What kinds of withdrawal from mandatory savings should be allowed?
For housing guarantees?
Maintenance / divorce orders ?
Unemployment?
Discretionary provided some level of saving is maintained?
12. National Treasury 12 Balancing preservation, equity in annuitisation and access to funds Option 1:
Mandatory participation in NSSF up to earnings threshold (say, R80 000 pa)
Mandatory/voluntary supplementary savings through accredited funds
Note: distinguish higher rate of contribution from contribution out of higher earnings
Access to NSSF savings for approved purposes only
Annuitisation by NSSF as multiple of indexed contribution credits
Option 2:
Allow opt-out for accredited industry funds for savings not risk benefits
Subject to minimum benefit and governance standards
NSSF serves as default fund
Reinsurance through NSSF
NSSF quotes default annuity rates, access capped
Option 3:
Allow opt-out for industry or voluntary funds during savings build-up
Mandatory transfer of standard accumulation amount to NSSF for annuity purchase at retirement
Balance may be drawn for lifetime needs or as lumpsum at retirement
13. National Treasury 13 UIF reform – balancing labour market and income security needs Consideration to be given to inclusion of public servants, migrant workers on fixed-term contract, learners and the self employed
Adjustments needed to risk benefits covered through other state programmes (UIF section 14 exclusions)
Development of a framework for linking unemployment benefits with measures aimed at re-integration into the labour market
Extending the period of UIF benefits to be investigated, to provide for social assistance to those who remain unemployed beyond expiry of funded benefits
14. National Treasury 14 Survivor benefits – administrative challenge Present arrangements fragmented and inefficient
Identification of beneficiaries and distribution of death benefits is onerous burden on trustees
Benefits vary widely
Delays and administrative failures common
Overlaps between death and disability insurance (“group life”), RAF and compensation funds arrangements
Survivor benefits are not integrated with social assistance (child support and foster care grants)
Guardian’s Fund administers orphans’ benefits on behalf of GEPF and other legacy funds
Systems outdated and inefficient
Large-scale administrative challenge –
4 : 1 ratio of adult deaths to retirements
15. National Treasury 15 Institutional fragmentation – public sector Occupational compensation – Three separate administrative arrangements under Labour, Health (lung diseases) and NT (public service)
Guardian’s Fund: administrative challenges; inadequate trusteeship over orphan’s funds
Single public service – municipal pension funds in disarray
Implications of social security & retirement reform for GEPF not yet adequately researched
SASSA – UIF – compensation funds – RAF – contributory social security fund
Is it time to share institutional capacity and systems infrastructure?
Governance arrangements need to be aligned with system requirements: collection, registration, administration of accounts, management of funds, payment … member protection, adjudication of disputes
Planning & sequencing reforms requires detailed strategy and improved inter-departmental coordination
16. National Treasury 16 Systems improvement and modernisation
Benefits: economies of scale in administration, simplicity and accessibility for beneficiaries, standardization of systems and integrated fraud control arrangements
SASSA is largest payments infrastructure, currently makes use of regional payments contractors (using both banks and Post Office)
More efficient long term payments arrangements needed
UIF administration has successfully enrolled household and agriculture employees and streamlined payments through an electronic platform
Option of public-private partnership in administration clearing-house to be explored
17. National Treasury 17 A pensions administration “clearing house”?
18. National Treasury 18 Retirement fund industry reforms Transition to mandatory retirement provision involves several reforms:
Preservation of benefits and portability
Defined minimum benefits
Management of transaction costs and disclosure of fees
Development of common regulatory framework
Pension and provident funds
GEPF and other exempt schemes
Issues in annuity design
Standards for accredited (tax privileged) retirement funds
Provision for post-retirement medical contribution assurance
Reducing costs means product standardisation, improved disclosure, capping of charges, managed competition
Encouraging economies of scale – such as industry funds
Regulatory and tax reforms are aimed at improving equity, efficiency and adequacy
19. National Treasury 19 Labour market and poverty implications SA needs to encourage job creation, social security has to avoid raising labour costs
Hence wage subsidy proposal
Well-designed social security can support formalisation of employment & reduce dependence on welfare assistance
Mandatory contributory savings & preservation of retirement benefits requires improved unemployment and risk (death, disability) benefits
“Poverty trap” can be overcome by earnings-related bridge between social assistance programmes & tax-privileged retirement, risk and medical scheme benefits
Illustrative modeling results: Impact of social grants (2), plus wage subsidy and social insurance (3), on poverty (R322 pppm in 2000 prices) by 2020:
Gini Poverty head-count (million) Income gap (R billion)
1 0.626 16.27 357.3 2 0.614 13.38 189.5
3 0.577 8.55 98.7
Cost: Social grants R63 billion; wage subsidy R30 billion; tax relief R22 billion
Source: Simkins, Social security projections
20. National Treasury 20 Implications for tax system Consideration of combined payroll taxes (UIF, skills levy) in a consolidated social security contribution
Public service included
Coverage issues to be considered: agriculture, self-employed, household employees
Offsetting wage subsidy and changes to the personal income tax structure
Further reform of retirement fund & medical scheme tax deductibility to cap benefits & improve equity
Tax encouragement of mandatory contributions to a basic savings element
Some tax encouragement of supplementary savings
No special tax treatment above a certain ceiling
Scrapping of RFT: improved retirement benefits
Simplification of formula applied to tax-free lump sum benefits
Administrative and systems capacity to manage individual contribution records
21. National Treasury 21 National health insurance South Africa lagging behind in meeting health MDGs – what are the priorities for meeting household needs?
Water supply and sanitation
Malaria prevention – vector control
TB and infectious diseases
HIV prevention and Aids treatment
Vaccination against childhood diseases
Trauma services and road accident prevention
Broadening access to health insurance needs to be balanced with funding other health promotion investments
Three alternative NHI paradigms:
A state-owned and managed hospital and primary health system
(coordinated supply of services) eg UK prior to reforms
Membership of health insurance on standard terms and conditions
(purchase of services by insurers) eg Japan
Decentralised district management of services, autonomous hospitals (funded on formula basis) eg France
22. National Treasury 22 NHI – funding considerations Gap between public health spending and comprehensive insurance is large: perhaps 1 : 10
But many peer group countries provide an affordable “core health package” that yields better outcomes than SA achieves
A costed PMB standard is a possible point of departure for equitable NHI benefit: but balance between hospital benefits and ambulatory (primary) care in basic benefit package difficult to achieve
Regulation of tariff-setting and medical scheme benefit structures is necessary element in managing resource allocations
Intersection with retirement funding : PRMA arrangements
Several specific health services invite joint public-private funding:
Emergency medical services and trauma
ARV distribution and HIV management
Immunisation and health promotion programmes
Laboratory services and pharmaceutical logistics
Better alignment between public and private hospital services means building better public hospital management systems
23. National Treasury 23 Progress to date Basic social security design
Good progress towards a shared government view, further analysis needed
Reform options need intensive review by industry, business and labour
Institutional coordination of administrative arrangements
Broad institutional governance option explored
Limited progress in interdepartmental cooperation
Systems design and development
Conceptual framework and “administration clearing house” model developed
SARS personal income tax reforms lay foundation for contribution collection
Retirement regulation reform
Good progress on further legislative and regulatory steps
Sequencing of reforms & consultation with industry ongoing
Employment and wage subsidy proposal
Discussion paper and evaluation model have been prepared
Linkages with wider social security reform (NHI, RAF, labour policy)
Health insurance issues currently under scrutiny
24. National Treasury 24 Research, analysis and modelling : towards an ASSA agenda ? Long-term demographic, employment and income trends –
Robustness of alternative arrangements to future scenarios
International trends in retirement and social security
Migration issues and cross-border harmonization
Coverage, costs and benefits
Comparative performance of SA retirement & life arrangements
Economies of scale
Balance and alignment of savings & risk pooling; retirement & death/disability benefits
Reform of present DB and public sector arrangements
Occupational health & compensation and RAF reform
National health insurance and medical scheme design
Basic benefit package design
Options for public-private partnership
Regulation and competition reform