420 likes | 524 Views
Missing E nergy Searches at the LHC (in the context of SUSY) Henning Flaecher University of Rochester with University of Bristol from Oct. 1 st IoP Dark Matter Meeting. Overview. ATLAS and CMS have established their N ew Physics searches with missing energy
E N D
Missing Energy Searches at the LHC (in the context of SUSY) Henning Flaecher University of Rochester with University of Bristolfrom Oct. 1st IoP Dark Matter Meeting King's College London
Overview • ATLAS and CMS have established their New Physics searches with missing energy • mostly presented in context of Supersymmetry • “2nd round” of results presented at this years summer conferences • EPS, LP, SUSY11 • All results discussed today are based on~1fb-1 • twice as much data on tape by now • In this talk: • SUSY missing energy searches • Jets + missing energy • Jets + missing energy + 1 lepton • Jets + missing energy + 2 OS/SS leptons King's College London
There’s more… • Unfortunately no time to cover many analyses, e.g., • Jets + missing energy + (1 or 2) photons • Jets + missing energy + photon + lepton • analyses with b-tags • analyses with taus • search with >=6 jets • search with >=3 leptons • Please see: • ATLAS • https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/SupersymmetryPublicResults • CMS • https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResults King's College London
SUSY Searches: Overview • Search for heavy pair-produced particles that decay to SM particles and LSP • strong production of squarks and gluinos • large cross-section • heavy squarks and gluinos • possibility of long decay chains • direct decay of squarks or gluinos to quarks (jets) + LSP • cascade decays via charginos resulting in leptons • R-parity conservation: LSP • missing energy • Signature: high-pT jets, leptons and missing energy • Focus on simple signatures/topologies • common to many models Rochester Seminar
Search Strategy • 2 lepton (same sign) • A natural SUSY signature • Very small Standard Model backgrounds • Include all three generations of leptons and all cross channels • Multi-lepton • Very clean events, very low SM background • Include all three generations of leptons and all combinations • Search inclusively, on the Z peak, with and without MET • Photons • Many gauge-mediated models predict photons in final state • Di-photon searches dominated by QCD multijet and γ+jet backgrounds • 0 lepton • Very challenging due to large amount and wide range of backgrounds • However most sensitive search for strongly produced SUSY • pursue complementary strategies based on kinematics and detector understanding • 1 lepton • Lepton (electron or muon) requirement reduces background considerably • Only ttbar and W+jets left ➔ topological handles • 2 lepton (opposite sign) • Adding a second lepton (electron or muon) reduced W background • Several techniques including opposite-sign opposite-flavour subtraction • Shape information and mass edges From A. Tapper, CERN LPCC seminar
Unfortunately, no signs of new physics so far… • Focus on complementary methods King's College London
Jets + missing energy • CMS • “inclusive” HT & MHT search • Complementary approaches, using kinematic variables • αT, MT2, “razor” • Different selections/variables result in different SM backgrounds • ATLAS • Selection on jet pT and ETmiss • split by jet multiplicity • Meff = HT + ETmiss as discriminating variable King's College London
Jets + missing energy • Analysis strategy • Define control regions or control samples for different types of background • W, Z, tt, QCD multijet events • Obtained by reversing a signal region cut, or requiring leptons or photons • defined in a kinematically similar environment to signal region • MC transfer factors used to extrapolate from control region/sample to signal region • takes care of efficiency, acceptance etc. King's College London
ATLAS: Jets + missing energy • Example • Zνν + jets: use Zμμ + jets and photon+jets control samples • for photon pT >> mZ, process is kinematically similar • W and tt background: require well reconstructed lepton • use b-tag (veto) to separate W’s from tt • QCD background • reverse cut on min(ΔΦ) between ETmiss and 3 leading jets • select badly measured jets that align with ETmiss QCD tt King's College London
ATLAS: control distributions photon +jets Zμμ W+jets King's College London
ATLAS: signal sample King's College London
CMS: αT jet jet LSP LSP jet jet • Kinematic variable αT • Exploits QCD di-jet properties • jets are balanced in pT • back-to-back in φ • Define: HT = ΣpT(ji), MHT = |-ΣpT(ji)|, ΔHT=ET(pj1)-ET(pj2) aT for n jets: aT for dijets: Expectation for QCD: αT = 0.5 Jet mis-measurements: αT < 0.5 (form two pseudo-jets – defined by balance in “pseudo-jet” HT = SET) inspired by L. Randall & D. Tucker-Smith, Phys.Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 221803 12 Rochester Seminar March 22nd, 2011
CMS: αT • αT as “QCD killer” • exploit RαT = N(αT>0.55)/N(αT<0.55) independence of HT • photon+jets control sample for Zνν + jets • muon control sample for W/tt • combined fit to photon, muon and hadronic signal sample mu control sample (possible “signal contamination” considered) King's College London
CMS: αT SUS-11-003 arXiv:1109.2352 “Hadronic” signal sample King's College London
Classic HT & MHT • Search regions in HT & MHT • Baseline (HT>350 & MHT > 200) • loose event selection used for validation • Medium (HT>500 & MHT > 350) • generic high multiplicity and missing momentum search • High HT (HT>800 & MHT > 200) • long cascades, high particle multiplicity • High MHT (HT>800 & MHT > 500) • generic search for weakly interacting neutralparticle, good background rejection SUS-11-004 King's College London
Limits on CMSSM • Similar sensitivity of ATLAS and CMS searches and complementary approaches • CMSSM: 4 parameter model assuming common gaugino and scalar masses at GUT scale (m1/2, m0) King's College London
Other searches: MT2 • MT2 is a generalization of transverse mass to a system with two semi-invisibly decaying particles • Two selections: • heavy sparticles large msq, small mgl King's College London
Other searches: MT2 • High MT2 Low MT2 SUS-11-005 King's College London
Leptonic Searches • Isolated lepton requirement reduces background considerably • strong suppression of QCD • mainly W’s and tt left • Analyses typically require leptons (el,mu) with pT>20-25 GeV and additional (>2) jets with pT >40 GeV + ETmiss King's College London
CMS 1-lepton search: 2 Methods • 1) Lepton Projection Method • Exploit difference in correlations between lepton and ETmiss in SM (W, tt) and SUSY events • Lepton-projection variable: • Define signal and control regions and use MC to extrapolate SUS-11-015 Muons Electrons King's College London
CMS 1-lepton search SUS-11-015 • 2) Lepton Spectrum Method • exploit similarity of charged lepton pT and neutrino pT (=ETmiss) spectra in W decays • correct for efficiency, acceptance and polarisation • smear lepton pT using QCD templates (ETmissresolution) • Etmissfrom LSP’s extends to much higher values • Selection: • HT>500 GeV • MHT>250 (loose) • MHT >350 (tight) King's College London
ATLAS 1-lepton search • 1 lepton + 3 or 4 jets • 4 signal regions with different selections on MT, ETmiss and Meff • Low MT and ETmiss control regions for W and tt background • b-tag for tops King's College London
Interpretation in CMSSM • Single lepton analyses of CMS and ATLAS King's College London
OS dileptons • Selection of 2 isolated leptons • strong change in SM background composition • strong QCD suppression as well as W’s • main background: tt • Analyses inside & outside Z window • Require two isolated opposite sign leptons • >= two jets • requirements on HT and MHT • HT > 300 and MET > 275 GeV • HT > 600 and MET > 200 GeV King's College London
CMS OS dilepton search • 2 methods for background estimation • 1) Lepton Spectrum method • use the observed pT(ll) distribution to model the pT(vv) distribution, which is identified with ETmiss • 2) “Matrix method” • two uncorrelated variables, each with signal and control region, HT and y=ETmiss/√HT SUS-11-011 King's College London
ATLAS OS dilepton • 3 signal regions: • 1) ETmiss> 250 GeV • 2) ETmiss> 220 GeV, jet pT > 80,40,40 GeV • 3) ETmiss> 100 GeV, jet pT >100,70,70,70 GeV • tt and Z background from control regions • fake leptons from “matrix method” • WW,WZ,ZZ from MC King's College London
SS dileptons • Basically no significant SM process • apart from “fake” leptons • Natural SUSY signature through charginos in gluino cascade decays King's College London
ATLAS SS dilepton • 2 same sign dileptons with missing energy • two search regions: • ETmiss> 100 GeV • ETmiss> 100 GeV, 2 jets with pT > 50 GeV • Charge misidentification from Z events • Fake lepton with matrix method using “tight” and “loose” selection King's College London
CMS SS dilepton search • require two isolated same sign dileptons • search in different HT & ETmiss regions • Main backgrounds from fakes, various data driven methods using “tight”-”loose” selections on the leptons SUS-11-010 King's College London
CMS SS dilepton • Data yields compared with different background estimation metods SUS-11-011 inclusive dilepton high-pTdilepton tau dilepton King's College London
CMS CMSSM Summary Similar for ATLAS King's College London
Alternative Interpretation: Simplified Models • Working with theorists in context of LPCC • Models proposed at: http://www.lhcnewphysics.org • Agreed on reference topologies for early searches • Cover what one might see in the early running phase, all initiated by strong production • So far considered • pair produced squarks, where each squark decays to quark (jet) and LSP • gluino decoupled at high scale • pair produced gluinos, where each gluino decays directly to two light quarks (jets) and LSP • squarks decoupled at high scale • Study 2D parameter space in msq (mgl) and mLSP • Set limits on production cross section Rochester Seminar
Variable mass splittings! • αT: efficiency maps cross-section limit King's College London
Models with leptons: SS and OS • Same-sign dilepton Opposite sign dilepton King's College London
ALTAS Simplified Models King's College London
Simplified Model Summary Similar for ATLAS King's College London
Conclusions & Outlook • New Physics searches well underway at both CMS and ATLAS • Investigating a wide variety of New Physics scenarios: • see https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResults • http://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/SupersymmetryPublicResults • Unfortunately no smoking gun seen so far, but • CMS and ATLAS have entered new territory • starting to “challenge” simple models • Need to design analyses that are sensitive to models with small mass splittings • simplified models give experimentalists good idea of coverage of their search • Much more data already on tape, 5fb-1 by end of year or Moriond • keep searching for New Physics in model independent way • diversification to third generation (b-tag, taus) King's College London
BACKUP King's College London
αT: CLS King's College London
ATLAS Limits King's College London
“Classic” MHT search King's College London