1 / 32

Program Health Metrics/Templates

Program Health Metrics/Templates. Program Life Cycle Phase:. Probability of Program Success Summary. PEO PEO’s Name. Program Name ACAT ID. Date of Review: 2 May 06. Naval Vision. LEGENDS Colors : G: On Track, No/Minor Issues Y: On Track, Significant Issues

lida
Download Presentation

Program Health Metrics/Templates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Program Health Metrics/Templates

  2. Program Life Cycle Phase: Probability of Program SuccessSummary PEOPEO’s Name Program Name ACAT ID Date of Review: 2 May 06 Naval Vision LEGENDS Colors: G: On Track, No/Minor Issues Y: On Track, Significant Issues R: Off Track, Major Issues Gray: Not Related/Not Applicable Trends: Up Arrow: Situation Improving (number): Risk Score (based on 100 possible) Down Arrow: Situation Deteriorating Software Rebaselines: (0) Last Rebaseline: Date

  3. I. Program Requirements Factor

  4. PEOXXX Predictive Historical Y Y ProgramAcronymACAT XX REQUIREMENTS - PROGRAM PARAMETER STATUS PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy (EXAMPLES) Objective Threshold Combat Capability Position diamond along bar to best show where each item is in terms of its threshold - objective range. C4I Interoperability (Strategic, Theater, Force Coord.,Force Control, Fire Control) Cost Manning (Non-KPP) • Status as of Last Brief • (mm/yy – e.g. “01/03”) Sustained Speed Endurance Comments:

  5. PEOXXX Predictive Historical Y Y ProgramAcronymACAT XX REQUIREMENTS - PROGRAM SCOPE EVOLUTION COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy RequirementFunded PgmSchedule (Budgeted/Obl) (Used / Planned) • Original CDD (date) $#.#B / NA NA / 120 Months • Current CDD (date) $#.#B / $#.#B 170/210 Months Stable Increased Descoped Comments:

  6. II. Program Resources Factor

  7. Predictive Historical Y Y Program Funding Requirement

  8. PEOXXX Predictive Historical G G ProgramAcronymACAT XX RESOURCES - BUDGET PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy Navy Goals (Obl/Exp): First Year Second Year Third Year RDT&E,N 95%/58% 100%/91% ------- OP,N 70%/--- 85%/--- 100%/--- OM,N ------- Comments:

  9. Predictive Historical G G Staffing Adequacy Staffing Level Skill Level Previous Current Future Previous Current Future OVERALL G G G G G G Program Mgmt G G G G G G Engineering G Y Y G G G Logistics G G G G G G Test & Evaluation G G Y G G Y Contracting Mgmt G R G G Y G Budget & Financial Mgmt G G G G G G Cost Analysis Y R G G G G Depots G G G G G G Resource Sponsors G G G G G G

  10. PEOXXX Predictive Historical Y Y ProgramAcronymACAT XX RESOURCES – CONTRACTOR HEALTH COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy • Corporate Indicators • Company/Group Metrics • Current Stock P/E Ratio • Last Stock Dividends Declared/Passed • Industrial Base Status (Only Player? One of __ Viable Competitors?) • Market Share in Program Area, and Trend (over last Five Years) • Significant Events (Mergers/Acquisitions/ “Distractors”) • Program Indicators • Program-Specific Metrics • “Program Fit” in Company/Group • Program ROI (if available) • Key Players, Phone Numbers, and their Experience • Program Manning/Issues • Contractor Facilities/Issues • Key Skills Certification Status (e.g. ISO 9000/CMM Level) • PM Evaluation of Contractor Commitment to Program • High, Med, or Low

  11. Predictive Historical Y Y Contractor Staffing

  12. III. Program Execution Factor

  13. Notional Program Schedule FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 IOC Seabasing CBA JIC Approved FOC Seabasing CBA Inc Three CDD Approval -------- -------- Inc Two CDD Approval DAB PR MS B Inc One CDD Approval Squadron DAB PR Milestones/Reviews AS Approval Squadron Acquisition Schedule: Lead Ship Follow Ship Follow Ship System 1 System 2 System 3 Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2 Subsystem 3 Contract Award and Reviews First Ship Design & Mat’l Procurement IT DEL First Ship Design & Mat’l Procurement w/ AP Funds Follow Ship Mat’l Procurement AT DEL Construction BT Preliminary (8 mo) And Contract Design (12 mo) OPEVAL 4 mo after DEL Builders Trial (BT) Acceptance Trial (AT) Integrated Trial (IT) Delivery (Del) OPEVAL AT DEL BT Preliminary And Contract Design Platform Quantities 1 1 1 System Quantities 1 1 1 Subsystem Quantities 1 1 1 AP 1 AP 1 1 We are here Total Program 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 (10/09/07)

  14. PEOXXX Current Predictive Y Y ProgramAcronymACAT XX EXECUTION – CONTRACT EARNED VALUE METRICS [give short contract title] COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy Axxxxx-YY-Cxxxx Contractor Name [Prime or Significant Sub] [TCPIEAC = 0.76] CV = $2.0 M SV = $2.9 M 04/00 04/02 01/02 04/04 08/04 Total Calendar Schedule PM’s EAC $M 100% 108% 0 % 50% 42% 122% $110 EAC 1.18 Ahead of Schedule and Underspent $100 TAB 111% Behind Schedule and Underspent 1.14 100% $90 BAC 04/99 07/99 (-0.95, 1.1) (1.1,1.1) 1.10 10/99 04/00 1.06 PM’s Projected Performance at Completion for CPI and Duration. 01/00 07/00 10/00 1/01 1.02 02/02 04/01 CPI 56% $50 03/02 07/01 0.98 05/02 ACWP 04/02 0.960 (-0.95, -0.95) (1.1, -0.95) 0.94 EV % Spent 10/01 01/02 0.90 Total Spent 0.86 0.940 Behind Schedule and Overspent Ahead of Schedule and Overspent 0% 0 0.82 KTR’s EAC: 104M 0.82 0.86 0.90 0.94 0.98 1.02 1.06 1.10 1.14 1.18 1.18 YYMMDD SPI Date of Last Award Fee: MMM YYDate of Next Award Fee: MMM YY Date of Last Rebaselining: JAN02Number of Rebaselinings: 1Date of Next Rebaselining: MMM YY

  15. Predictive Current Y Y Cost Risk and Mitigation • This slide will use NAVSEA/NAVAIR S- curve for cost risk showing current info and if possible where the PM expects to be in 1 year and why (mitigation plan). • Include where cost risk was last year • Include PM and all independent cost estimates AIR-4.2’s Most Likely Estimate $XXXM AIR-4.2’s Point Estimate $XXX PM

  16. Predictive Current Y Y APB Schedule Performance Discuss Breaches and mitigation plans Only applies when you have a APB

  17. Predictive Current Y Y APB Cost Performance Only applies when you have a APB Discuss Breaches and mitigation plans

  18. PEOXXX Predictive Current Y Y ProgramAcronymACAT XX EXECUTION – CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy

  19. PEOXXX Current G(3) Predictive G ProgramAcronymACAT XX EXECUTION – FIXED PRICE PERFORMANCE COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy • DCMA Plant Rep Evaluation • Major Issues • Delivery Profile Graphic (Plan vs Actual) • Major Issues • Progress Payment Status • MajorIssues • Other Metrics are Available • Example – Status/Explanation for Production Backlog

  20. PEOXXX • A brief description of Issue # 5 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation • A brief description of Issue # 3 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation • A brief description of Issue # 2 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation • A brief description of Issue # 6 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation • A brief description of Issue # 1 and rationale for its rating. • Approach to remedy/mitigation Predictive Current Y Y ProgramAcronymACAT XX EXECUTION - PROGRAM RISK ASSESSMENT COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy ( ) 5 High ( ) 4 • (4) Medium 3 Likelihood • (2) (3) Cost, schedule, technical and external risks 2 Trends: Up Arrow: Situation Improving (#): Situation Stable (for # Reporting Periods) Down Arrow: Situation Deteriorating 1 Low 1 3 4 5 2 Consequence

  21. EXECUTION – SUSTAINABILITY RISK ASSESSMENT PEOXXX Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk 5 RISK # 6 Brief description of Issue and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation. 4 Likelihood 3 2 1 1 3 4 5 2 Predictive Current Y Y ProgramAcronymACAT XX COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy 6 7 5 RISK #5 Brief description of Issue and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation. 4 3 1 2 Consequence RISK # 4 Brief description of Issue and rationale for its rating. Approach to remedy/mitigation. Sustainability Areas (examples) 1: Training 2: Support Equipment 3: Publications 4: Facilities 5: Maintenance Concept 6: Supply Support 7: MTBF/Ao/Reliability

  22. Risk and Mitigation Plan for each RED- Yellow in B/U Date of Review: 11/2007 Risk Owner: Program office, Contractor Description: • Two PB 08 Congressional marks ($30M/$4.9M). If passed will significantly increase risk of executing the POR. Impacts risk reduction, shipyard PD/CD, Government review of shipyard products and source selection. Mitigation Steps: 1. Brief Resource Sponsor on funding requirements for POM 10 09/05//07 2. De-scope and re-prioritize POR execution plan 10/07 – 12/07 3. Develop and staff POM 10 issue 11/07 – 05/08 4. Requirement included in Navy POM 10 Submit 05/08 5. Requirement included in PB10 01/09 6. Brief Congressional Staffer’s on funding requirement 03/09 7. Track Congressional actions and ensure funding is included in final DoD appropriations bill 8. De-scope and reprioritize Program, if necessary, based on final Congressional action Category: High 5-5 Pre MDAP Technology Development Phase 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 Sept 10 Nov 07 Sept 07 Oct 07 May 08 Jan 09 Mar 09 PM

  23. ILS Status

  24. PEOXXX Predictive Current G G ProgramAcronymACAT XX EXECUTION – TESTING STATUS COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy • TES/TEMP Status • Contractor Testing - Status (R/Y/G) • Major Points/Issues • Developmental Testing – Status (R/Y/G) • Major Points/Issues • Operational Testing – Status (R/Y/G) • Major Points/Issues • Follow-On Operational Testing – Status (R/Y/G) • Major Points/Issues • Special Testing – Status (R/Y/G) (Could Include LFT&E, Interoperability Testing (JITC), Etc.) • Major Points/Issues • Other (DOT&E Annual Report to Congress, etc – As Necessary)

  25. PEOXXX CDR Maturity of Key Technologies 10 9 8 Tech 1 Tech 2 7 Tech 3 6 Tech 4 5 Tech 5 4 3 2 Predictive Current 1 Y Y 0 Mar-01 Jun-01 Sep-01 Dec-01 Mar-02 Jun-02 Sep-02 Dec-02 Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Dec-03 ProgramAcronymACAT XX EXECUTION – TECHNICAL MATURITY COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy Milestone C Program Initiation

  26. Program XXX Summary Top Cost Drivers COSTS ARE BASED ON PROGRAM OF RECORD AND ARE INTERDEPENDANT, NOT SEPARABLE • Transport, Carry, Offload and Deliver 1/3 of a Surface BLT (w/o manning) (Surface Battalion Landing Team Employment KPP) 25% • Propulsion & Control System (Surface Battalion Landing Team Employment and At-Sea Vehicle/Equipment and Personnel Transfer KPPs) 19% • Accommodations (Mission Payload and Surface Battalion Landing Team Employment KPPs) 15% • At sea vehicle transfer capability (At-Sea Vehicle/Equipment and Personnel Transfer KPP) 7.5% Notional Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Technology Readiness Assessment Note: Program is Pre-Milestone “B” and does not yet have an APB Cost FY08$ B - PAUC - APUC MS B 07/10 01/11 Schedule IOC 03/16 06/16

  27. I I I I C C C C S S S S P P P P 3 3 3 3 1 I C S P Interrelationships, Dependencies and Synchronization with Complementary Systems Aviation: CH-53 MH-60S MH-60R UH-1/AH-1 MV-22 Combat Logistics Force: T-AKE T-AOE Air Force: HH60G MH53J or M C5/C17/KC_ 1 2 2 1 3 1 C4: GCCS-M JTRS Cluster 1 JTRS Cluster 5 JTRS WNW DCGS-N JPALS 1 1 Sea Shield: DDG1000 CG(X) LCS SSGN DDG-51 SSN-774 CSG / ESG: CVN 21 LHA(R) CVN-68 LHD LPD-17 3 2 3 2 2 2 Program X 3 2 2 2 Army: LCU 2000 LSV CH47 variants AH64D OH58D LMSR FSS 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Connectors: EFV LCAC JHSV 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 MPF(F) LMSR MPF(F) LHA(R)/ LHD 1 1 3 1 1 3 • PM DAES Rating: I C S P Not Rated Fielded • I = Integration. • Color denotes Synchronization of effort with this program • Number denotes degree of dependency: • 1 – Critical , 2 – Significant , 3 - Enabler Solid denotes current system Dash denotes future system Arrow to MPF(F) denotes supports MPF(F) Arrow from MPF(F) denotes MPF(F) supports 1 DEC. 07

  28. IV. Capability Fit Factor

  29. PEOXXX Predictive Current Y Y(2) ProgramAcronymACAT XX PROGRAM “FIT” IN CAPABILITY VISION COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy AREA(Examples)STATUSTREND DoD Vision G (2) • Transformation G (2) • Interoperability Y (3) • Joint G (3) Naval Vision Y (4) • Current Force Y (4) • Future Force (N/A) (N/A) • Other (N/A) (N/A) • Overall YY (2) • TRANSFORMATION: THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PROGRAM POSSESSES THE TRANSFORMATIONAL ATTRIBUTES (E.G. PRECISION, LETHALITY, STREAMLINED/COMMON LOGISTICS, ETC) SPECIFIED BY OSD LEADERSHIP • INTEROPERABILITY: THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PROGRAM COMPLIES WITH/HAS EMBEDDED WITHIN IT THE ARCHITECTURAL /ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS (E.G. COMPLIANCE WITH THE GLOBAL INFORMATION GRID (GIG)/INFORMATION DISSEMINATION MANAGEMENT (IDM) CRDS, DII, OPEN ARCHITECTURE PROTOCOLS) WHICH WOULD ALLOW IT TO INTEROPERATE ACROSS SERVICES (JOINT FORCES)/WITHIN COALITIONS • JOINTNESS: THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PROGRAM IS USABLE BY OTHER SERVICES, JOINT OPERATIONS, AND COALITIONS WITHOUT UNIQUE SUPPORT ARRANGEMENTS BEING MADE BY THOSE USERS

  30. V. Advocacy Fit Factor

  31. PEOXXX Current Predictive Y Y ProgramAcronymACAT XX PROGRAM ADVOCACY COL, PM Date of Review: dd mmm yy AREA(Examples)STATUSTREND • OSD Y (2) • (Major point) • Joint Staff Y (2) • (Major point) • War Fighter Y (4) • (Major point) • Naval Secretariat G • (Major point) • Congressional Y • (Major point) • Industry G (3) • (Major Point) • International G (3) • (Major Point) • Overall Y

  32. Congressional Adds/Issues

More Related