1 / 14

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems. AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild. Policing. “Policing is no longer a local community service provided by local agencies addressing local problems.” (Dammer and Fairchild, 2006). Question.

ling
Download Presentation

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparative Criminal Justice Systems AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON POLICING Reichel / Dammer and Fairchild

  2. Policing “Policing is no longer a local community service provided by local agencies addressing local problems.” (Dammer and Fairchild, 2006)

  3. Question How will globalization affect the way police agencies (worldwide) perform their job? Are populations static? In times of change, what issues must the police be aware of? (content, context, time)

  4. The Changing Role of Police Multi-jurisdictional Multi-cultural Multi-political Multi-technical

  5. Question In times of civil tension and the concern for public order - how should officer discretion be controlled in a democratic society?

  6. Centralized Single: Ireland, Israel, Nigeria, Poland, Saudi Arabia Multiple Coordinated: Austria, France, England/Wales Multiple Uncoordinated: Belgium, Italy, Spain, Switzerland Decentralized Single: Japan Multiple Coordinated: Australia, Canada, Germany Multiple Uncoordinated: Mexico, United States Types of Police Structures

  7. Policing – Global Cooperation • Interpol (International Criminal Police Organization); Lyons, France. • Europol (European Police Organization); The Hague, the Netherlands. • The Amsterdam Treaty/Schengen Agreement • European Arrest Warrant (Euro-warrant)

  8. Interpol • Two governing bodies: the General Assembly and the Executive Committee. • 183 members, each with their own National Central Bureau (NCB) – a global conduit for communication and data sharing. • NCB’s created because of difference in police forces, languages, and legal systems. • Major role is to supply transnational crime information to national police forces. • Interpol is not based on an international treaty or convention; it is not an international police force, it does not investigate crime.

  9. NCB Responsibilities* • Maintain open channels to all police units in its own country. • Maintain connections with the NCBs of all other member countries. • Maintain liaison with the General Secretariat.

  10. Europol • Operates under a mandate for preventing and combating “organized” criminal activities operating in several countries. • Its efforts are directed against crimes such as drug trafficking, illicit vehicle trafficking, trafficking in human beings, terrorism, and money laundering. • It has no police authority across the EU. • Its role is to facilitate the exchange of both personal and nonpersonal data among Europol liaison officers who represent the various law enforcement agencies.

  11. The Schengen Convention • 13 European countries. The creation of a single external border which abolished internal border checks. A common visa program among member countries. • Exhibits coordination among police, customs, and judiciary officials in each country. Accentuates cross-border surveillance (customs), hot pursuit (police), and extraditions (judiciary). • Member countries have a common data base.

  12. Euro-Warrant • An example of harmonization and approximation in the EU. • The objective is to replace lengthy extradition procedures. • Two key aspects include: Abolishment of the principle of dual criminality for 32 serious offenses; the requirement of the surrender of a country’s own nationals.

  13. Questions Do you feel that the concepts of community policing, zero-tolerance policing, and proactive policing will have an effect on the global community in the near future? If so, in what way? Will heterogeneity have an affect?

  14. Civil Order Control*(Six Model Nations) • England: Depends on regular street police although little attention is paid to civil order control forces. • France: Specialized troops in both the national police and the military (not always accountable to the public). • Germany: Youngest officers do civil order control work; mature officers focus on street work. • Japan: Specialized civil order police in each prefecture. • China: Public security police with assistance from the army. • Saudi Arabia: Relies on the military to handle serious civil disorder. * Generally, the “front line” responsibility for civil order, as for deviance control, rests with the street police.

More Related