1 / 33

A REPAIR KIT FOR GRADING- 15 Fixes for Broken Grades A look at Grading Practices

A REPAIR KIT FOR GRADING- 15 Fixes for Broken Grades A look at Grading Practices. Darin Cloninger Principal, Richlands High School Neil Hecht Assistant Principal ~ Intern , WOHS. Introductions. Presenters Participants Book. Group Activity. In Small Groups Sticky notes on chart paper

lizina
Download Presentation

A REPAIR KIT FOR GRADING- 15 Fixes for Broken Grades A look at Grading Practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A REPAIR KIT FOR GRADING- 15 Fixes for Broken GradesA look at Grading Practices Darin Cloninger Principal, Richlands High School Neil Hecht Assistant Principal ~ Intern, WOHS

  2. Introductions • Presenters • Participants • Book

  3. Group Activity • In Small Groups • Sticky notes on chart paper • Discuss as a small group

  4. Sticky Notes • What is the purpose of grading? • Should behaviors be included with grading? • What is your opinion of Zero as a grade?

  5. Four Essential Questions • What do we want all students to know and be able to do? • How will we know if they have learned it? • What will we do if they haven't learned it? • What will we do if they already know it? -Rick DuFour

  6. Fix 1: Don’t include student behaviors (effort, participation, adherence to class rules, etc.) in grades, include only achievement. A Repair Kit For Grading – 15 Fixes for Broken Grades Pages 16-23

  7. Fix 2: Don’t reduce marks on “work” submitted late; provided support for the learner. A Repair Kit For Grading – 15 Fixes for Broken Grades Pages 24-31

  8. Fix 3: Don’t give points for extra credit or use bonus points; seek only evidence that more works has resulted in higher level of achievement. A Repair Kit For Grading – 15 Fixes for Broken Grades Pages 32-37

  9. Fix 4: Don’t punish academic dishonesty with reduced grades; apply other consequences and reassess to determine actual level of achievement. A Repair Kit For Grading – 15 Fixes for Broken Grades Pages 38-46

  10. Fix 6: Don’t include group scores in grades; use only individual achievement evidence. A Repair Kit For Grading – 15 Fixes for Broken Grades Pages 52-56

  11. Fix 12: Don’t include zeros in grade determination when evidence is missing or as punishment; use alternatives, such as reassessing to determine real achievement, or use “I” for Incomplete or Insufficient Evidence. A Repair Kit For Grading – 15 Fixes for Broken Grades Pages 95-104

  12. What is the Power of Zero?

  13. Calculate the Final Grade Calculate the grade for this student. 10 grades (MA = Missing Assignment) C, C, MA, D, C, B, MA, MA, B, A

  14. Let’s Look At 3 Questionable Grading Practices: • Averaging to obtain a course grade. • Giving zeroes for work missed or work turned in late. • Grading on a curve.

  15. Temperature Readings Average: 55.2 degrees Is this information accurate for what really happened? * On Friday I forgot to take the reading.

  16. The Case Against “Zero” • The four point scale is a rational system, as the increment between each letter grade is proportionate to the increment between each numerical grade – one point. • The common use of the zero today is based not on a four-point scale but on a 100-point scale. This defies logic and mathematical accuracy. Dr. Douglas Reeves, the Case Against Zero, Phi Delta Kappan, 2004

  17. The Effect of Zero Mean = 68.8% +Does this accurately reflect what the student knows and can do? Median = 86% Mode = 86% Student A 86 86 86 0 86 Mean calculated with 50% instead of 0 = 78.8%

  18. Accurate grades are based on the most consistent evidence . . . • Consider looking at the pattern of achievement, including trends, not the average of the data. • This means focusing on the median and mode, not mean, and weighing the most recent scores heavier than earlier scores. Median: The middle test score of a distribution, above and below which lie an equal number of test scores. Mode: The score occurring most frequently in a series of observations or test data.

  19. Zeros Kill Averages! • Just 2 or 3 zeros are sufficient to cause failure for an entire semester, and just a few course failures can lead a student to drop out of high school. • Most sentences for punishment ultimately come to an end, while grades of zero on a 100-point scale last forever. • The mathematically accurate value of an F is 69, not 0. • It is almost impossible to overcome many zeros in a grading period. • If our lowest score was a 50, many would still fail, but many more would believe they can overcome their low averages. 93-100 = A (7 points) 85-92 = B (7 points) 77-84 = C (7 points) 70-76 = D (6 points) 0-69 = F (69 points!)

  20. A = 100 –31 B= 30 – 24 C = 23 – 16 D = 15 – 8 F = 7 – 0 What if we reversed the proportional influences of the grades? That “A” would have a huge, yet undue, inflationary effect on the overall grade. Just as we wouldn’t want an “A” to have an inaccurate effect, we don’t want an “F” grade to have such an undue, deflationary, & inaccurate effect. Is keeping zeroes on a 100-pt. scale is just as absurd as the scale seen here? Imagine the Reverse…

  21. Supporting Research . . . “When we record 50% for student zeros in our grade books, we are not giving students something for nothing. We are adjusting the grade intervals so that any averaging we do is mathematically justified and more importantly, that any grade we determine from the pattern of grades is a valid indicator of mastery. A zero has an undeserved and devastating influence, so much so that no matter what the student does, the grade distorts the final grade as a true indicator of mastery. Mathematically and ethically this is unacceptable.” -Rick Wormeli, 2006

  22. The Problem With the Zero on a 100 point Grading scale • Very Simple Math • (100 + 0)/2 = 50F • (4 + 0)/2 = 2 C • So, how many perfect scores does it take to raise a 0 to a C on a 100 point scale?

  23. Answer:3! (100 + 100 + 100 + 0)/4 = 75

  24. A Simple Change If the lowest score on a 100 point scale is not 0, but 50 . . . (100 + 50)/2 = 75 C

  25. 100 4 90 3 80 2 70 1 60 0 50 -1 40 -2 30 -3 20 -4 10 -5 0 -6 A (0) on a 100-pt. scale is a (-6) on a 4-pt. scale. If a student does no work, he should get nothing; not something worse than nothing. How instructive is it to tell a student that he earned 6-times less than absolute failure? Consider being instructive, rather than punitive. -Doug Reeves, The Learning Leader, 2006 Consider the Correlation

  26. Is This Grade Inflation? Are students getting points for having done nothing? The student will still get an F (50%) for the assignment. Giving a 50 equalizes the influence of each grade in determining the overall grade.

  27. What About Missing Work? “. . .the appropriate consequence for failing to complete an assignment is to require the student to complete the assignment. That is, students lose privileges—free time and unstructured class or study-hall time—and are required to complete the assignment.” -“The Case Against Zero”, Doug Reeves, 2004

  28. “Low Grades Don’t Motivate” “Low grades push students farther from our cause, they don’t motivate students. Recording a “F” on a student’s paper won’t light a fire under that student to buckle down and study harder. It actually distances the student further from us and the curriculum, requiring us to build an emotional bridge to bring him or her back to the same level of investment prior to receiving the grade.” -Guskey (documented by Guskey and Bailey)

  29. Zeros as Punishment Despite evidence that grading as punishment does not work (Guskey, 2000) and the mathematical flaw in the use of the zero on a 100-point scale (Reeves, 2004), many teachers routinely maintain this policy in the mistaken belief that it will lead to improved student performance. Defenders of the zero claim that students need to have the consequences for flouting the teacher’s authority and failing to turn in work on time.” -Reeves, 2008 Educational Leadership Vol. 65 #5

  30. Grades as Weapons “. . . some teachers consider grades or reporting forms their ‘weapon of last resort.’ In their view, students who do not comply with their requests suffer the consequences of the greatest punishment a teacher can bestow: a failing grade. Such practices have no educational value and, in the long run, adversely effect students, teachers, and the relationship they share.” Guskey, Thomas R. (Editor) Communicating Student Learning: The 1996 ASCD Yearbook ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 1996, 18

  31. Research-based decision making “No studies support the use of low grades or marks as punishments. Instead of prompting greater effort, low grades more often cause students to withdraw from learning.” Guskey and Bailey, Developing Grading and Reporting Systems for Student Learning, 2005, 34-35

  32. Four Essential QuestionsA Reflection • What do we want all students to know and be able to do? • How will we know if they have learned it? • What will we do if they haven't learned it? • What will we do if they already know it? -Rick DuFour

  33. Survey http://tinyurl.com/repairkitciai2011

More Related