1 / 10

MSJC Board Self Evaluation Summary

Review results, identify achievements and areas for improvement, crucial for ongoing board effectiveness and meeting accreditation standards. Facilitated by Rebecca Teague, assess instrument, set goals, and ensure compliance. Discussion includes board policies and annual timeline.

lorie
Download Presentation

MSJC Board Self Evaluation Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MSJC – B.O.T. Self Evaluation (FA08)June 11, 2009 Goals of the Board Self Evaluation: • WASC Accreditation Standard Requirements • Evaluation of Board effectiveness • Identify areas of accomplishments • Identify area of improvement • Will be used as a starting point for next year’s goals & objectives Objective: to review YOUR results of the questionnaire • No Concerns • Room for Improvement • Areas Needing Further Attention Source: MSJC Board of Trustees Self Evaluation – Fall 2008, BOT includes five members: Joan Sparkman (President), Eugene Kadow (Clerk) ,Dorothy McGargill, Ann Motte & Gwendolyn Schlange. Data complied by IR Dept. XCHASX-5.29.9

  2. MSJC – B.O.T. Self Evaluation (FA08) • Self administrated questionnaire • 45questions & 11 Categories • Mission • Advocacy • Professional Development • Interpersonal Relations • Audience Sensitivity • Decision Making • Discernment • Objectivity • Performance Orientation • Financial Responsibility • Relation with Superintendent/President • 5 point scale • Almost Always • Often “top 2 boxes” • Sometimes • Seldom • Rarely

  3. Source: MSJC Board of Trustees Self Evaluation – Fall 2008, BOT includes: Joan Sparkman (President), Eugene Kadow (Clerk) ,Dorothy McGargill, Ann Motte & Gwendolyn Schlange. Red indicates that two trustees chose the ‘top 2 boxes “ & two chose the “bottom two boxes” (Rarely /Seldom). Data complied by IR Dept. XCHASX-5.29.9

  4. MSJC – B.O.T. Self Evaluation • Questions regarding data

  5. MSJC – B.O.T. Self Evaluation • Accreditation Standard IV. B.1.g • Board Policy #2745 • Accreditation Recommendation • Recommendation #7: The team recommends that the Board implements its established policy on self-evaluation Facilitator: Rebecca Teague– Accreditation Liaison Officer/ Director of Grant Development

  6. MSJC – B.O.T. Self Evaluation • Board Discussion • Self-Evaluation Results • Assess Self-Evaluation Instrument and Process • Annual Self-Evaluation Timeline Facilitator: Rebecca Teague – Accreditation Liaison Officer/ Director of Grant Development

  7. MSJC – B.O.T. Self Evaluation • Next steps • Strategic /Institutional Goals Vs Board Goals • Compliance with Accreditation Standard Facilitator: Rebecca Teague – Accreditation Liaison Officer/ Director of Grant Development

More Related