1 / 18

AOE 5204 Vehicle Dynamics & Control

AOE 5204 Vehicle Dynamics & Control. Fall 2006 Professor Chris Hall Randolph 214 cdhall@vt.edu http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~cdhall. AOE 5204 Vehicle Dynamics & Control.

lottie
Download Presentation

AOE 5204 Vehicle Dynamics & Control

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AOE 5204Vehicle Dynamics & Control Fall 2006 Professor Chris Hall Randolph 214 cdhall@vt.edu http://www.aoe.vt.edu/~cdhall

  2. AOE 5204Vehicle Dynamics & Control Course description:This course focuses on the relevant rigid body kinematics and dynamics issues common to studying the motion of several types of vehicles such as aircraft, spacecraft, and ships, and provides a foundation for advanced courses and research on the dynamics and control of vehicles. The course includes a review of particle motion and its application to aircraft performance and satellite orbital mechanics. Modeling of the rotational and translational motion of rigid bodies is covered in detail, with emphasis on rigor. Special cases are used to illustrate application of the general equations of motion. Linearization of the equations of motion is demonstrated for stability analysis, modal analysis, and control system synthesis, with an introduction to classical control system concepts. Sensors and actuators commonly used on vehicles are described. Specific examples from aircraft, missiles, spacecraft, rockets, ships, and submersibles are developed to illustrate applications relevant to AOE majors. Pre: AOE 3134, 4140, or permission of instructor. (3H, 3C).

  3. Topics To Be Covered • Overview (~2 lectures) • Review of particle motion (~2 lectures) • Rotational kinematics (~4 lectures) • Rigid body motion (~4 lectures) • Linear systems analysis (~6 lectures) • Applications (~9 lectures) Details are included in syllabus

  4. Assignments and Grading Homework 25% ~one/week Midterm I 25% 6th week first midterm exam will be closed-notes Midterm II 25% 11th week second midterm exam will be open-notes Final Exam 25% Finals week final exam will be open-notes & comprehensive Homework assignments should be completed in a professional manner. Typesetting is not required, but handwritten work should be neat and legible.

  5. Overview • Examples from aircraft, missiles, spacecraft, rockets, ships, and submersibles, such as Herbst maneuver, target tracking, landmark tracking, launch to orbit, capsizing, and gliding. This overview will include videos, animations, and examples of successes and failures. • These examples will be used to emphasize that translational and rotational motion are coupled, but that decoupled analysis is useful. The overview will also discuss the importance of control systems in these problems, with some discussion of sensors and actuators.

  6. What Vehicles? • A vehicle is a mechanical system for transporting objects in space: • oxcarts, chariots, ships, bicycles, motorcycles, automobiles, airplanes, spacecraft, submarines, rockets, missiles, …. • In this course, we are primarily interested in vehicles whose three-dimensional motion is reasonably well-approximated by a combination of point-mass and rigid-body models: • airplanes, spacecraft, submarines, rockets, missiles, ….

  7. Key Distinctions • Land vehicles, such as motorcycles, depend on elastic deformation as an important element of vehicle dynamics • Illustrations from R.S. Sharp, S. Evangelou And D.J.N. Limebeer, “Advances in Motorcycle Dynamics,” Multibody System Dynamics 12: 251–283, 2004

  8. Fundamental Thoughts ~ ~ f a m = h w e r e ~ f h l d f i i t t s e n e a p p e o r c e , h h l d i i t m s e v e c e m a s s a n , ~ h l i i t t a s e a c c e e r a o n • The first approximation of the motion of a vehicle is to consider the vehicle as a point mass subject to applied forces • Environmental forces such as gravity and aerodynamic drag • Control forces such as propulsive thrust • The governing physical principle is Newton’s 2nd Law: • The D&C analyst’s challenge is to correctly model the forces to determine, and control, the vehicle’s motion

  9. Fundamental Thoughts (2) • For aircraft, there is no special terminology for translational motion or deviations from nominal translational motion • For spacecraft, deviations from nominal motion are referred to as in-track, cross-track, and radial motions • For ships, translational motion components are referred to as surge, sway, and heave • Illustration from on-line notesof T. I. Fossen, author of Guidanceand Control of Ocean Vehicles,Wiley, 1994

  10. Fundamental Thoughts (3) ~ d ~ h g = d t h w e r e ~ h l d d i i t t t g s e n e a p p e o r q u e a n , ~ h h l i t t s e a n g u a r m o m e n u m • The second approximation of the motion of a vehicle is to consider the vehicle as a rigid body subject to applied forces and moments • Environmental forces and moments such as those due to gravity and aerodynamic drag • Control forces and moments such as those due to propulsive thrust and momentum exchange devices • The governing physical principle is Euler’s Law: • The D&C analyst’s challenge is to correctly model the moments and forces to determine, and control, the vehicle’s motion

  11. Roll, Pitch and Yaw

  12. Roll, Pitch and Yaw Yaw Yaw Axis Roll Axis Pitch Roll Pitch Axis Note: RPY Axes can vary significantly from spacecraft to spacecraft, depending on the specifics of a particular spacecraft’s mission.

  13. Roll, Pitch, and Yaw • Illustration from on-line notes of T. I. Fossen, author of Guidanceand Control of Ocean Vehicles, Wiley, 1994

  14. Fundamental Thoughts (4) ~ d d ~ f l N E L L n 2 t u e w e r o s n v s a w a w m = d t ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ f h d ( ) ~ f g a m = = v m d = t d t h h ~ d w w e e r r e e ~ f p = ~ d t ~ f l l d d f d i i i i t t t g s s n n e e a a p p p p e e o o r r c q e u e a n h , , w e r e ~ h h l l d i i i t m s s a v n e g u c a e r m m a o s m s e n a n u m ~ l i i t , p s n e a r m o m e n u m ~ l i i t a s a c c e e r a o n ~ d ~ f p = d t ~ d ~ h g = d t ) • The two governing physical principles are more alike than appears at first glance: • Another way to state the 2nd Law is:

  15. Fundamental Thoughts (5) • One of the more difficult elements of modeling rotational motion is the connection between the orientationof the vehicle and the angular momentum • Rotational kinematics is sufficiently important that we will discuss it in a separate series of lectures before discussing rigid body motion

  16. Examples • The remainder of this lecture and the next will provide some examples of vehicle dynamics and control problems from the literature • Hubble Space Telescope • Shuttle Pilot-Induced Oscillation (PIO) • C-17 Aerial Refueling PIO • YF22 PIO and Crash • USS Bakula Missile Fin Flutter • F-15 Missile Deployment • Atlantis Launch

  17. Hubble Space Telescope • Launched April 1990 • Mass = 11000 kg • Pointing = 0.007 arc seconds • Orbit: • Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) • ~580 km altitude, 96 min period • Velocity ~17,000 mph (7.6 km/s) • 28.5 inclination • Attitude sensors: • Fine Guidance Sensors, Gyros, Star trackers, Sun sensors,Magnetometers • Attitude actuators: • Momentum wheels and Magnetic torque bars • Attitude control is extremely precise, but rotational maneuvers are quite slow: about the speed of the minute hand on a clock

  18. Videos • Shuttle Pilot-Induced Oscillation (PIO) • C-17 Aerial Refueling PIO • YF22 PIO and Crash • USS Bakula Missile Fin Flutter • F-15 Missile Deployment • Atlantis Launch

More Related