1 / 64

LIQUOR LIABILITY

LIQUOR LIABILITY. PRESENTED BY: Getman, Schulthess & Steere Three Executive Park Drive Bedford, NH 03110 (603) 634-4300. Getman, Schulthess & Steere. Statutory Law:. 507-F:3 Defendants. 3 3 Any person licensed or required to be licensed under RSA 178:1, I and any

luann
Download Presentation

LIQUOR LIABILITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LIQUOR LIABILITY PRESENTED BY: Getman, Schulthess & Steere Three Executive Park Drive Bedford, NH 03110 (603) 634-4300

  2. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  3. Statutory Law: 507-F:3 Defendants.33 Any person licensed or required to be licensed under RSA 178:1, I and any employee or agent of such person who commits an act giving rise to liability, as provided in RSA 507-F:4 and 5, may be made a defendant to a claim under the provisions of this chapter. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  4. ?Last Year’s Adjuster’s Conference? Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  5. Who can bring suit: RSA 507-F separates plaintiffs into 2 classes: • 1. Any person damaged by the negligent service of alcoholic beverages (except for the person who becomes intoxicated) as a result of the conduct of an intoxicated patron of a licensee may bring action against the server of the alcoholic beverages. RSA 507-F:2, I. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  6. 2. The intoxicated person may bring suit. Although a person who becomes intoxicated may not bring an action for negligent service of alcoholic beverages against the person or entity that served him the beverage, he may bring such action when the service of the beverages was reckless. RSA 507-F:2 II., 507-F:5. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  7. NEGLIGENCE STANDARD RSA 507-F:4 applies to cases involving an innocent third party who is injured by an individual who was over served alcohol by the defendant. A defendant may be liable under RSA 507-F:4 when “the defendant knows or if a reasonably prudent person in like circumstances would know that the person being served is a minor or is intoxicated.” This a negligence standard. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  8. Wrongful Death CasesWhich Standard Applies? The Statute: “…a person who becomes intoxicated may not bring an action for negligent service of alcoholic beverages against the person or entity that served him the beverage, he may bring such action when the service of the beverages was reckless…” Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  9. Wrongful Death CasesWhich Standard Applies? Are estates and consortium plaintiffs considered to have inherited the standard that would apply to the decedent when he is the one who over-consumed alcohol? Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  10. There is No Clear Answer…But -

  11. Wrongful Death CasesWhich Standard Applies? 556:12 “Damages for Wrongful Death, Elements” Estate damages are based on the injury suffered by the decedent. BUT… Consortium damages are based on the injury suffered to the consortium plaintiff. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  12. Wrongful Death CasesWhich Standard Applies? • However – even in consortium cases, damages are reduced by the primary plaintiff’s comparative fault • RSA 507:8-a “Where fault on the part of the claimant or the claimant’s spouse is found to have caused, in whole or in part, the injury to the spouse on which the claim for loss of impairment of consortium is based, damages recoverable shall be subject to diminution . . . .” • RSA 556:12 (II & III) “[W]here fault on the part of the decedent . . . is found to have caused, in whole or in part, the loss complained of, damages recoverable shall be subject to diminution . . . .”.  Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  13. NOTICE RSA 507-F:4 further provides that: VII. A defendant is not under a duty to recognize signs of a person's intoxication other than those normally associated with the consumption of alcoholic beverages except for intoxication resulting in whole or in part from other drugs consumed on defendant's premises with defendant's actual or constructive knowledge. RSA 507-F:4(IV). Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  14. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  15. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  16. RSA 507-F:4 V No Duty to Investigate A defendant does not have a duty to investigate whether a person being served alcoholic beverages intends to serve the alcoholic beverages to other persons off the premises. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  17. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  18. RECKLESS STANDARD RSA 507-F:5 provides that a “person who becomes intoxicated may bring an action against a defendant for serving alcoholic beverages only when the server of such beverages is RECKLESS.” Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  19. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  20. RECKLESSNESS Recklessness can be demonstrated when: • (a) Active encouragement of intoxicated persons to consume substantial amounts of alcoholic beverages. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  21. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  22. RECKLESSNESS • (b) Service of alcoholic beverages to a person, 16 years of age or under, when the server knows or should reasonably know the patron's age. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  23. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  24. RECKLESSNESS • (c) Service of alcoholic beverages to a patron that is so continuous and excessive that it creates a substantial risk of death by alcohol poisoning. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  25. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  26. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  27. RECKLESSNESS • (d) The active assistance by a defendant of a patron into a motor vehicle when the patron is so intoxicated that such assistance is required, and the defendant knows or should know that the intoxicated person intends to operate the motor vehicle. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  28. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  29. RSA 507-F:I(IX) “’Service of alcoholic beverage’ or ‘service’ means any sale, gift, or other furnishing of alcoholic beverages.” Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  30. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  31. Statute is Exclusive Remedy for Negligent Claims: Because RSA 507-F:8 provides that the remedies contained in the chapter are exclusive, RSA 507–F:4 supersedes the common law to the extent that the elements of the action under the statute differ from the elements of a common law action for negligent service. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  32. Defenses: Responsible business practice defense Service of alcoholic beverages is not negligent or reckless if the defendant, at the time of the service, is adhering to responsible business practice. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  33. Responsible business practices are those business policies, procedures, and actions, which an ordinarily prudent person would follow in like circumstances. • a. Service of alcoholic beverages to a person, with actual knowledge that the person is a minor or is intoxicated, is not a responsible business practice. RSA 507-F:6 II. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  34. b. Evidence of responsible business practices is relevant in determining whether a defendant who does not have actual knowledge of a plaintiff’s age or intoxicated condition should have known the age or intoxicated condition of the person. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  35. Service to minors: RSA 507-F:6 VI provides that evidence of responsible business practice includes but is not limited to: • (1) Management policies, which assure the examination of proof of age as required by RSA 179:8, for all persons seeking service of alcoholic beverages who may reasonably be suspected to be minors. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  36. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  37. Service to minors: • (2) Comprehensive training of employees who are responsible for such examination regarding the detection of false or altered identification. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  38. VALID IDENTIFICATION • A motor vehicle driver’s license; • An identification card issued by the director of motor vehicles; • An armed services identification card; and • A valid passport Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  39. Service to intoxicated persons: RSA 507-F:6 III provides that evidence of responsible business practices may include, but is not limited to: • (1) Comprehensive training of the defendant and the defendant’s employees and agents who are present at the time of service of alcoholic beverages. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  40. Evidence of responsible management policies, procedures, and actions: Includes, but is not limited to, policies, procedures, and actions which: • (1) Encourage persons not to become intoxicated if they consume alcoholic beverages on the defendant’s premises Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  41. (2) Promote availability of nonalcoholic beverages and food Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  42. (3) Promote safe transportation alternatives other than driving while intoxicated Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  43. (4) Prohibit employees and agents of defendant from consuming alcoholic beverages while acting in their capacity as employee or agent Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  44. (7) Maintain an adequate number of trained employees and agents for the type and size of the defendant’s business Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  45. Defenses: Comparative Negligence: Prior to passage of RSA 507-F, this defense was available to common-law actions against liquor licensees for negligent service of alcoholic beverages. See Ramsey v. Anctil, 106 N.H. 375 (1965). There is nothing in the language of RSA 507-F or RSA 507:7-d (NH’s comparative negligence statute) suggesting that RSA 507:7-d would not be applicable in actions under RSA 507-F. This issue has not yet been addressed by the NH Supreme Court. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  46. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

  47. Defenses: Defense of Complicity • (1) This is a defense recognized under the dram shop acts in most jurisdictions • (2) “One who has participated in bringing about the intoxication of another cannot recover against the tavern keeper” • (3) Rationale: A civil damage act does not contemplate giving a remedy to one who joins in or participates in contributing to the violation of it. • (4) The issue of the availability of this defense in actions under RSA 507-F has not yet been addressed by the NH Supreme Court. Getman, Schulthess & Steere

More Related