1 / 5

Aim

Does a waist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer quantify community ambulation in persons with multiple sclerosis?. Jacob J. Sosnoff, PhD; Michael J. Socie, MS; Morgan K. Boes, MS; Brian M. Sandroff, MS; Robert W. Motl, PhD. Aim

lucie
Download Presentation

Aim

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Does a waist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer quantify community ambulation in persons with multiple sclerosis? Jacob J. Sosnoff, PhD; Michael J. Socie, MS; Morgan K. Boes, MS; Brian M. Sandroff, MS; Robert W. Motl, PhD

  2. Aim • Examine association between community-based walking and movement counts recorded by waist-worn accelerometer in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). • Relevance • Accelerometry objectively measures community ambulation in persons with MS. • However, assumption that walking itself serves as major contributor to accelerometer signal hasn’t been tested.

  3. Method • Ambulatory persons with MS wore triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X) and IDEEA system for 1 day. • 5 males/17 females. • 13 without aid/9 with aid. • Outcome measures for accelerometer: • Movement counts per hour for vertical, anterior-posterior, and mediolateral axes. • Outcomes for IDEEA system: • % time walking, sitting, standing; walking speed.

  4. Results • Significant correlations between: • % walking time and movement counts per hour along the vertical and anterior-posterior axes. • Movement counts per hour along the vertical axis and: • walking speed • self-reported walking impairment • disability.

  5. Conclusion • Our observations further support accelerometry as objective marker of community ambulation in persons with MS.

More Related