1 / 17

Better Wind Resource Estimation through Detailed Forest Characterization

Better Wind Resource Estimation through Detailed Forest Characterization. Jens Madsen & Adrien Corre Vattenfall R&D. EWEA 2011 (Session: Siting Challenges) Bruxelles, March 14.17, 2011. >50% Forest Dairy farming Meadows / pastures Tundra Intensive farming.

lucus
Download Presentation

Better Wind Resource Estimation through Detailed Forest Characterization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Better Wind Resource Estimation through Detailed Forest Characterization Jens Madsen & Adrien Corre Vattenfall R&D EWEA 2011 (Session: Siting Challenges) Bruxelles, March 14.17, 2011

  2. >50% Forest Dairy farming Meadows / pastures Tundra Intensive farming Locating Wind Farms in Forested Areas … What is the problem? • Forests induce high wind shear and turbulence • Reasonable wind speeds only at higher hub heights So, build somewhere else then … • Sweden has 60-65% forest coverage • Onshore projects in/near forested areas is the rule rather than the exception 2 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  3. CFD and Forest Flows • CFD as a Wind Resource Assessment Tool • Overcomes shortcomings of linearized flow models … including forested areas • Technical Risk Mitigation: Mapping of severe conditions (turbulence, shear, inflow angle) • Economical Risk Mitigation: Potential to significantly reduce wind resource uncertainty • CFD approach to Forest Canopy Modeling • Canopy represented by porous zone: drag resistance & turbulence modulation • Applies first principles 3 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  4. CFD Forest Canopy Model (by Katul et al.) • Inside a forest canopy, (z<H) momentum sinks are applied • This drag resistance depends on Leaf Area Density (LAD or α) [m2/m3] • Leaf Area Index(LAI) is the corresponding integral forest density [-] G.Katul et al. : ”One- and Two-Equation Models for Canopy Turbulence” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol.113, pp.81-109, 2004 4 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  5. Model Parameter Sensitivity – Uniform Forest, Flat Terrain • Preliminary sanity check using 2D model • LAD profiles mostly impact wind speeds within canopy • Correct tree height H is much more important than forest density • In particular true at typical hub heights • Highest sensitivity to model parameters occur near step changes in height and density (forest edges, clearings) 5 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  6. Model Validation – Risø/DTU Forest Edge Experiments MM-1 MM-2 6 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  7. Risø/DTU Forest Edge Experiments LAD data backed out from CFD (courtesy of Andrey Sogachev) Seasonal variation in forest density 7 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  8. Model Validation – MM-2 (inside forest) • Canopy models are sufficiently good … • … considering the poor parameters we feed into them (GIGO principle applies) • Implement advanced forest characterization techniques • The idealized, homogeneous forest does not exist • Spatial distribution of forest height (and density) • What is the impact of a considering a more realistic, heterogeneous forest layout? 8 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  9. Forest Characterization – Classical approaches Spatial Layout • Classification from satellite/aerial images • Forest perimeters identified • Digitized vegetation map Tree Height • Assessed through site inspection • Extensive lumping is necessary 9 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  10. Z LAD Forest Characterization – Canopy density (LAD/LAI) hemispherical photography • Direct methods: • Foliage samples, destructive testing • Indirect methods: • Measure Fraction of transmitted radiance • Hemispherical image analysis (LAI) Tedious methods! Limited point-wise sampling Calibration of density level 10 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  11. LIDAR Airborne Forest Imaging (cont’d) • Technology used in Forest Inventory Management • Laser beam is reflected either by vegetation or ground • Scans 500-800 meter wide section per flight leg • <10 cm accuracy (depending on flight height) • Data acquired (resolutions up tp 1x1 m2) • Digital Terrain Model (DTM) • Digital forest model • Spatial variation of tree heights and density profiles inferred from point cloud percentile values, e.g. zP-90, zP-75, zP-50, and zP-25 11 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  12. Int. Time LIDAR Airborne Forest Imaging 12 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  13. LIDAR Point Sky Rendering (colors by veg.height) 13 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  14. Detailed forest layout: wind speed distribution Forest Layout Wind Speed @ 10m agl. Lake with associated speed-up 14 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  15. Detailed forest layout: CFD vs. met mast data • Use of detailed forest layouts yield good agreement between CFD and on-site measurements for this Vattenfall site in Southern Sweden • Instrumented telecom mast (93m) and LIDAR campaign (Vestas) 15 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  16. Conclusions • General on wind power in forest • Forested areas are problematic but inevitable sites (in some geographies) • Extensive measurement campaigns (tall masts, SODAR and/or LIDAR) • Use taller hub heights than you would normally do • Wind resource assessment in forested areas • The CFD canopy models perform well • Detailed forest characterization provides more accurate results than modeling based on idealized, homogeneous forest • Correct tree height distribution is the key information (canopy density, less so) • Beware of information overkill. • Investigate trade-off between forest data resolution and accuracy 16 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

  17. Thanks for your attention Made possible throguh the collaboration with: Risø/DTU, Vestas Technology R&D, and ETS Montreal 17 | EWEA 2011 | Jens Madsen | March 2011

More Related