1 / 19

Elizabeth Corsentino Victor Molinari, Ph.D., ABPP, Advisor Lori Roscoe, Ph.D., Committee Member

Understanding the Experiences of Family Caregivers for Younger and Older Adults with Serious Mental Illness (SMI). Elizabeth Corsentino Victor Molinari, Ph.D., ABPP, Advisor Lori Roscoe, Ph.D., Committee Member Amber Gum, Ph.D., Committee Member.

luke-rivera
Download Presentation

Elizabeth Corsentino Victor Molinari, Ph.D., ABPP, Advisor Lori Roscoe, Ph.D., Committee Member

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Understanding the Experiences of Family Caregivers for Younger and Older Adults with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) Elizabeth Corsentino Victor Molinari, Ph.D., ABPP, Advisor Lori Roscoe, Ph.D., Committee Member Amber Gum, Ph.D., Committee Member Funded by: The USF Office of Undergraduate Research

  2. Terms • Caregiver- a person who provides informal, unpaid care and has regular contact with a person with SMI • Serious Mental Illness (SMI)- longstanding psychiatric problems that significantly interfere with day-to-day functioning, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major affective disorder

  3. Purpose The purpose of the present study was to examine the experiences of informal caregivers of persons with SMI, focusing on the general challenges impacting caregivers as relatives with SMI age.

  4. Participants Recruited through The Advocate, a newsletter sent to members of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI)

  5. How caregiving has changed Over 55 years old Current Experience/ Level of Planning Demographic Information Under 55 years old How they envision it will change Survey Instrument • Survey instrument was available online at www.surveymonkey.com or by mail. • Survey consisted of 23 questions:

  6. Results: Caregiver Profile

  7. Results: Care-recipient Profile

  8. Quantitative Results: Caregiver Stress • Nearly 70% of caregivers reported that caregiving was somewhat to very stressful during the past 3 months. • The three top reasons for stress were: • Communication difficulties • Behavior problems • Planning for the future

  9. Quantitative Results: Plans for the Future • 60% of caregivers had made no plans for the future in the event they were no longer able to provide care in the future for loved ones with SMI

  10. Expectations of Caregivers of Persons Under 55: 39% say more difficult 39% say the same 22% say easier Perceptions of Caregivers of Persons 55 and Older: 75% say more difficult 19% say the same 6% say easier Quantitative Results:Caregiving Over Time

  11. Qualitative Results: Caregivers of Persons Under 55 “What do you envision will become easier as your loved one ages?” Frequent responses: • “Nothing” • Care-recipients becoming more accustomed to routine • Improvements in medication or a cure

  12. Qualitative Results: Caregivers of Persons Under 55 “What do you envision will become more difficult as your loved one ages?” Frequent responses: • Caregivers ability to provide care will become more difficult due to physical incapacity • Care-recipients physical health needs will increase • Financial stability will decrease

  13. Qualitative Results: Caregivers of Persons 55+ “What aspects of caregiving have improved as your loved one has aged?” Frequent responses: • Nothing • Care-recipient slowing down with age

  14. Qualitative Results: Caregivers of Persons 55+ “What aspects of caregiving have become more difficult as your loved one has aged?” Frequent responses: • Care-recipient’s physical health • Caregivers’ physical health • Financial stability

  15. Discussion • The overwhelming majority of respondents were aging parents • Caregivers prefer loved ones to live with family if they could no longer provide care, but rarely communicate these intentions. • Discrepancy between caregiver perceptions of the future and reality

  16. Strengths and Limitations Strengths • Survey available to those with and without internet access • Quantitative and qualitative information Limitations • Response rate low, but cannot be exactly determined • Limits to generalizability

  17. Implications • Future directions • Larger scale, mixed method approach • Possibly a longitudinal design • Consider reasons why some caregivers are able to sustain care in the community & others are not • Need more advocacy for caregivers • How can we help relieve their burden & assist with planning – it is a societal responsibility as well as a family responsibility

  18. Acknowledgments Thesis Advisor: Dr. Victor Molinari Committee Members: Dr. Amber Gum Dr. Lori Roscoe National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) USF Office of Undergraduate Research

  19. Acknowledgments Participating Caregivers “It is an on going caregiving experience that I expect to have for the rest of my life. I do not feel bad about that. I wish for him that it was not so.” “It is very easy for the caregiver to burn out, experience depression, and ‘lose’ their life.” “How much can I write? This whole process has been the most difficult time of my life. While mental illness [sic] effects the individual, it is a family issue, it is intertwined.”

More Related