1.55k likes | 1.8k Views
Forensic DNA profiling workshop. Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Keith Inman, Forensic Analytical, Oakland, CA. Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com). I: Overview of what DNA tests can do for: A. Prosecution B. Defense C. Post-conviction testing.
E N D
Forensic DNA profiling workshop Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Keith Inman, Forensic Analytical, Oakland, CA Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com)
I: Overview of what DNA tests can do for:A. ProsecutionB. DefenseC. Post-conviction testing
DNA Technology in Court • Criminal Prosecution • Unprecedented sensitivity and specificity for typing biological samples • Growing use of databanks and dragnets to identify suspects • Rapidly becoming cheaper and faster
DNA Technology in Court • Criminal Defense • Unprecedented sensitivity and specificity for typing biological samples • Potential support for alternative theories of the case
DNA Technology in Court • Post-conviction exonerations (208 in US) based on DNA evidence have revealed problems with the justice system
Three generations of DNA testing RFLP AUTORAD Allele = BAND DQ-alpha TEST STRIP Allele = BLUE DOT Automated STR ELECTROPHEROGRAM Allele = PEAK
Two relatively new DNA tests Mitochondrial DNA mtDNA sequence Sensitive but not discriminating Y-STRs Useful with mixtures Paternally inherited
Phenotyping: DNA WitnessTM • New test by DNA Print Genomics (Florida) • Tests SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) • Identifies ‘genetic heritage’ of sample • Provides percentages of makeup: • Sub-Saharan African • East-Asian • Indo-European • Native-American • Latest versions infer hair and eye color • Has been used in assisting investigations
Lab-on-a-chip • Currently in R&D • Use microdevices to • Extract DNA • Quantify DNA • PCR amplify DNA • Capillary electrophoresis • All on small, integrated glass or plastic chip • Quick (test in half hour?) • Very small samples? • Portable?
Basic terminology: Genetics • DNA Polymorphism (“many forms”) • Regions of DNA which differ from person to person • Locus (plural = loci) • Site or location on a chromosome • Allele • Different variants which can exist at a locus • DNA Profile • The combination of alleles for an individual
Basic terminology: Technology • Amplification or PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) • A technique for ‘replicating’ DNA in the laboratory (‘molecular Xeroxing’) • Region to be amplified defined by PRIMERS • Can be ‘color coded’ • Electrophoresis • A technique for separating molecules according to their size
STR • Short tandem repeat • Describes a type of DNA polymorphism in which: • a DNA sequence repeats • over and over again • and has a short (usually 4 base pair) repeat unit • A length polymorphism -- alleles differ in their length 3 repeats: AATG AATG AATG 4 repeats: AATG AATG AATG AATG 5 repeats: AATG AATG AATG AATG AATG 6 repeats: AATG AATG AATG AATG AATG AATG
Crime Scene Samples & Reference Samples Differential extraction in sex assault cases separates out DNA from sperm cells • Extract and purify DNA
Extract and Purify DNA • Warm soapy water • Releases biological material • Organic Extraction • Ethanol Precipitation
PCR Amplification Groups of amplified STR products are labeled with different colored dyes (blue, green, yellow)
Detector Window ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer: Capillary Electrophoresis • Amplified STR DNA injected onto column • Electric current applied • DNA pulled towards the positive electrode • DNA separated out by size: • Large STRs travel slower • Small STRs travel faster • Color of STR detected and recorded as it passes the detector
D3 vWA FGA D8 D21 D18 Amelogenin D5 D13 D7 Reading an electropherogram • ALLELE CALLS • Loci arranged by size and color • Allele designation given as a number • NUMBER OF PEAKS • 1 peak = homozygous • 2 peaks = heterozygous • 3 or more peaks = mixed sample (?) • HEIGHT OF PEAK • Proportional to amount of allele (approx) • RFU (relative fluorescent units) • Amelogenin • Sex of sample • XY = Male • X = female
Evidence (Bloodstain) Suspect reference Comparing electropherograms DIFFERENT
Victim reference Evidence (Bloodstain) Comparing electropherograms SAME
4 PEAKS Victim reference X>Y Evidence (swab) Suspect reference MIXTURE
x 0.222 x 2 Statistical estimates: the product rule 0.222 = 0.1
x x 1 in 111 1 in 20 1 in 22,200 x x 1 in 100 1 in 14 1 in 81 1 in 113,400 x x 1 in 116 1 in 17 1 in 16 1 in 31,552 Statistical estimates: the product rule 1 in 10 = 0.1 1 in 79,531,528,960,000,000 1 in 80 quadrillion
What more is there to say after you have said: “The chance of a coincidental match is one in 80 quadrillion?”
What more is there to say after you have said: “The chance of a coincidental match is one in 80 quadrillion?” • Two samples really do have the same source • Samples match coincidentally • An error has occurred
DNA match probability • Random Match Probability (RMP) • What is the chance of finding a random, unrelated person in a given population that has a given DNA profile? • NOT the probability that the defendant is guilty • NOT the probability that someone other than the defendant committed the crime
Combined probability of inclusion (CPI; reciprocal of CPE) What fraction of a population cannot be excluded as a possible contributor to a given mixture?
Combined probability of inclusion (CPI) What fraction of a population cannot be excluded as a possible contributor to a given mixture? For a locus with n alleles A1 through An CPIlocus = (A1+ A2+…+ An)2 Total CPI with 8 loci CPItotal = CPI1x CPI2x…x CPI8
p(21) = 0.185 q(22) = 0.219 r(23) = 0.134
p(21) = 0.185 q(22) = 0.219 r(23) = 0.134 (p + q + r)2 = CPI 0.289 = CPI
p(21) = 0.185 q(22) = 0.219 r(23) = 0.134 (p + q + r)2 = CPI 0.289 = CPI • What statistic should be applied to “Tom”? • SuspectFGA • Tom 21, 22
p(21) = 0.185 q(22) = 0.219 r(23) = 0.134 (p + q + r)2 = CPI 0.289 = CPI • What statistic should be applied to “Dick”? • SuspectFGA • Tom 21, 22 • Dick 22, 22
p(21) = 0.185 q(22) = 0.219 r(23) = 0.134 (p + q + r)2 = CPI 0.289 = CPI • What statistic should be applied to “Harry”? • SuspectFGA • Tom 21, 22 • Dick 22, 22 • Harry 22, 25
Combined probability of inclusion (CPI) What fraction of a population cannot be excluded as a possible contributor to a given mixture?
p(21) = 0.185 q(22) = 0.219 r(23) = 0.134 (p + q + r)2 = CPI 0.289 = CPI • What statistic should be applied to “Franklin”? • SuspectFGA • Tom 21, 22 • Dick 22, 22 • Franklin 22, 25
Combined probability of inclusion (CPI) What fraction of a population cannot be excluded as a possible contributor to a given mixture? What portion of the population cannot be excluded from contributing their DNA to a given mixture if they are allowed to not match at two loci? X
Matching profiles in NIST database n = 257 African Americans, 302 Caucasians (1 in 21 African Americans; 1 in 38 Caucasians)
Combined probability of inclusion (CPI) What fraction of a population cannot be excluded as a possible contributor to a given mixture? What portion of the population cannot be excluded from contributing their DNA to a given mixture if they are allowed to not match at two loci? X
Ignoring loci with “missing” alleles Labs often claim that this is a “conservative” statistic Ignores potentially exculpatory information “It fails to acknowledge that choosing the omitted loci is suspect-centric and therefore prejudicial against the suspect.” Gill, et al. “DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures.” FSI. 2006.