1 / 38

Differentiation and Small Group Instruction

Differentiation and Small Group Instruction. Data-Based Decision Making. Planning the content of daily instruction based on frequent, ongoing assessment data Grouping and regrouping students based on shared needs observed from data. Matching Text to Readers.

majed
Download Presentation

Differentiation and Small Group Instruction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Differentiation and Small Group Instruction

  2. Data-Based Decision Making • Planning the content of daily instruction based on frequent, ongoing assessment data • Grouping and regrouping students based on shared needs observed from data

  3. Matching Text to Readers • Instructional and independent levels are based on an individual student’s reading ability • What instructional and independence for one student may not be instructional or independence for another student in the same classroom

  4. Why Differentiate Instruction? The range of reading ability in a typical classroom is about five years and is more academically diverse than anytime in history. Kameenui & Carnine, 1998; Mathes, Torgesen, Menchetti, Santi, Nicholas, Robinson, & Grek, 2003

  5. Concept of Definition Map What is it? Nonexamples: Examples: Differentiated Instruction What is it like?

  6. Concept of Definition Map • With your partner, write your own definition of differentiated instruction. • Brainstorm examples of how a teacher might differentiated instruction. • Brainstorm examples that do NOT depict differentiated instruction. • Identify synonyms that describe what differentiated instruction is like.

  7. Concept of Definition Map What is it? Examples: Nonexamples: Teaching students according to their individual needs. Teaching targeted small groups Flexible grouping patterns Using assessment data to plan instruction Matching text level to student ability Independent projects tailored to student ability Whole class instruction Small groups that never change (tracking) All students reading same text Same independent seatwork assignments to entire class Differentiated Instruction What is it like? • Data-based instruction • Individualized instruction • Scaffolding

  8. What isDifferentiated Instruction? • Varying instructions to meet the needs of all students within the same classroom • Taking students where they are and moving them forward • Flexibly grouping and regrouping students according to shared needs and abilities

  9. The Academic Continuum

  10. The most effective learning arrangements increase academic engagement.

  11. Frequent monitoring Nonverbal signals Use of routines Models routines first Frequent positive interactions (4 to 1 ratio) Reinforce student accomplishments Effective Classroom Management Factors

  12. Develop a Classroom Plan for Differentiated Instruction • Routines are the key to sanity. • Arrangement of the classroom. • Time Allocation. • Scheduling.

  13. Establishing Routines • Rules for Centers • Moving to centers • Asking for help • Being accountable • Activities • Previously learned • Academically engaging

  14. Moving to Centers • At the beginning of the year practice the routine of moving with the students • Role play how to ask for help • Three before me • Exit slips • Students complete a half sheet of paper that contains a rubric for self-evaluation • Attach to completed work

  15. Activities • All activities should be previously learned • Use new words for word sort • Extend word activities into writing activities • Academically engaging • As much fun as cutting out boots and pasting on glitter might be to the students, it is not instructionally relevant.

  16. Other Guidelines • Make literacy stations an important part of learning each day – not something to do when everything is finished. • Have no more than two or three “work stations.” • Stations are always the same!!!!!! • Less is more!!!!! • Don’t have to be cute, just well thought out.

  17. Instructional Delivery • Well organized • Task oriented • Explicit • Reduces practice of errors • Demonstration, guided practice with prompts, and feedback

  18. Instructional Delivery • Classroom is well organized. • Desks are arranged so that all students are in the teacher's instructional zone. • Instruction is explicit (no guess work). Students know what and why. • Allstudents are being engaged in instruction. • No students are on the peripheral only marginally participating. • No students are sitting alone confused. • No student has been “ written off.”

  19. Time Matters This means: • Allocating more time to reading is only a first step. • Carefully choosing instructional materials and activities based on what research suggests is most effective. • Reducing down time and related activities time.

  20. Engaged Time Critical Factor Time students actually spend performing an academic task Students are sitting alone doing things they don’t understand Increasing Engagement Doesn’t have to be cute! Unison responses Partner Activities Peer Tutoring Cooperative Learning Focus on Academics

  21. Grouping Patterns Teachers who get the best outcomes use multiple grouping patterns to accommodate student’s academic diversity. • Whole Group • Small Group • Peer pairing • Cooperative projects Dependent on the the activity and student ability Eye on increasing active engagement.

  22. Grouping Practices

  23. Daily Small Group Lessons • Can include multiple tracks. • Each track will be visited for only a brief time. • Amount of new information should be reduced. • Most of each lesson should be review and generalization.

  24. The Differentiated Classroom Look for: • Routines • How classrooms are arranged to facilitate differentiation • How teachers use many techniques for increasing academic engagement during both teacher directed and student directed instruction

  25. Teacher-Directed Student-Directed • Clear expectations for student behavior • Clear academic objectives • Read, write, discuss, and practice critical skills • Multiple and varied opportunities to practice • Interactive • Engaging • Differentiated • Gives immediate and specific feedback • Reteaches as necessary • Teaches to mastery • Read, write, discuss, and practice critical skills independently • Accountable for their own learning

  26. Teacher-Directed Whole group Small group Same Ability Mixed Ability Individual Student-Directed Work stations Peer activities Collaborative groups Independent work Grouping Arrangements

  27. Increasing Academic Engagement During Teacher-Directed Instruction • Increase every student’s opportunity to respond to the teacher. • Use techniques other than calling on one student at time.

  28. Techniques:Check for Understanding • Everybody Questions • Thumbs-Up, Thumbs-Down • Use of White Boards • Response Cards

  29. Academic Engagement During Student-Directed Instruction • Work stations • Computers • Peer-assisted learning • Collaborative group routines

  30. Work Stations • A work station is not always completed in a special location in the room. • Most stations can be completed at students’ desks. • Some stations will need to be completed somewhere else in the room.

  31. What about the students with whom the teacher is not working? • Want to see lowest students getting “double dose.” • Instructional routines for the students who are not being taught directly by the teacher. • Every student knows routines. • Objectives support other aspects of instruction. • Students are partnered. • Students are reading and discussing text selection following specific routines. • Should be active, but not a zoo!

  32. Peer Partners • All students in class are paired with peers. • Partners should be different learner types. • Those needing more intense reading instruction paired with typical readers • Typical readers paired with advanced readers

  33. Peer Pairing Scheme • Rank-order your students in terms of reading skill. • Split them in half (more skilled half and less skilled half). Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 Student 20 Student 21 Student 21 Student 23 Student 24

  34. Peer Pairing Scheme • Pair the top-ranked student in the more skilled half with the top-ranked student in the less skilled half. • Continue this process until all of your students have partners. • Consider individual needs and personalities.

  35. Other ImportantGuidelines for Pairings • Reassign partners every four to five weeks. • Do not change partners in response to student requests or complaints

  36. Review of What We Learned In this section you learned: • how to plan differentiated instruction using student assessment data, • how to use flexible grouping arrangements, • techniques to increase academic engagement during both teacher directed and student directed instruction, • how to arrange your classroom to facilitate differentiated instruction.

  37. Currently Do: New Techniques: Reflections on Effective Differentiated Instruction Pledge: I commit to implementing the following 2 new techniques in my classroom:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature_____________________

  38. Remember... • Most reading difficulties can be prevented. • To provide targeted student instruction, student progress must be assessed and evaluated continually. • You are the best intervention strategy your students have. (Snow, Burns, & Griffin, 1998)

More Related