1 / 10

A Sustainability Pact for the Eurozone

Explore reform proposals, challenges with the Stability and Growth Pact, principles, and implementation of a new Sustainability Pact for Eurozone fiscal discipline and policy coordination.

margaretstein
Download Presentation

A Sustainability Pact for the Eurozone

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Sustainability Pact for the Eurozone Benoît Cœuré and Jean Pisani-Ferry February 2003

  2. The Current Fiscal Debate • The Eurozone since 1999: learning-by-doing on policy framework • Recent steps in the fiscal field: • Recognition of role for automatic stabilisers • Structural deficit path (-0.5% per year) • Ongoing work on « close to balance » concept • Commission proposals on implementation of SGP, coordination, and institutions

  3. Three Issues • How to implement fiscal discipline? (reforming the SGP) • Is policy coordination needed? • What role for EU institutions? Discipline and coordination frequently confused: • Discipline addresses spillovers from excessive deficits/debts (agreement on principle, discussion on design) • Coordination addresses other channels of interdependance (issue of principle as well as design)

  4. What’s Wrong with the SGP SGP is increasingly challenged for: • Weak analytical foundations • Excessive short-term focus • Wrong incentives • No regard for quality of spending • Disputable zero deficit target • One-size-fits-all • Poor implementation and lack of ownership

  5. Reform Proposals • Status-quo ante (« Right or wrong, our pact ») • ECB, Commission until 2002 • Revolution (« Abolish the pact, change the institutions ») • Wyplosz, Casella • Reform (« Keep the goals, amend the rules ») • Elaboration on golden rule: Blanchard and Giavazzi • Elaboration on sustainability: Buiter and Grafe • Muddling through (« Keep the rules, soften the interpretation ») • Commission since 2002, Buti et al.

  6. A Sustainability Pact: Principles and Implementation • Dangers of muddling through: too much discretion in sustainability assessment • Trade-off between economic soundness and tractability • Accomodate increasing EU diversity in terms of nominal growth, initial debt, investment needs, pension gap, etc. • « Basle 2 approach »: move away from uniform numerical targets towards common principles with decentralised implementation • Introduce new Pact as a voluntary option alongside existing SGP

  7. A Sustainability Pact:Three Building Blocks • Sustainability assessment to be based on comprehensive public sector balance sheet • Common methodology and statistical infrastructure (new ESA95) • Decentralised implementation subject to EU approval • Periodic revisions to take into account structural reforms (e.g. pensions, tax reform) and changes in economic assumptions • Derive Maastricht-type debt target from sustainability assessment • Wealth-stabilising debt ratio (WSDR), or • Debt target to be based on country « rating » category, avoiding frequent jumps in target value • Fiscal policy rules over the cycle

  8. Coordination • Still controversial (results are model-dependent) • Practical motives: • Uncertainty on ECB reaction function • Eurozone policy mix may matter (impact on exchange rate, current account; need to equip for Japan-type scenario) • Way forward: • More transparency and predictability (code of conduct, contingent rules in stability programs) • QMV in Eurogroup on joint actions

  9. Institutions and Governance • Current set-up: confusion of responsibilities • ECOFIN enacts both legislation and policy • Eurogroup has no defined mandate • Commission looking for a role • Enlargement to be a stress test. Way forward: clarify distinction between: • Rules-setting (ECOFIN), • Adaptation of rules (Eurogroup/Euro-ECOFIN), subject to call-back procedure by non-euro member states • Policy decisions (Eurogroup) • Independent surveillance (Commission)

  10. Conclusion • EMU basic principles in no need for reform, but weaknesses in implementation • Reform needed before Eurozone enlarges

More Related