1 / 25

Methodologies of Carbon Estimation

Methodologies of Carbon Estimation. By Zahabu , E & Malimbwi , R.E Department of Forest Mensuration and Management (SUA). Introduction. Carbon trade involves the sale of carbon credits. There are two main types of Carbon Trading Schemes that are operating globally to-date:

mari
Download Presentation

Methodologies of Carbon Estimation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Methodologies of Carbon Estimation By Zahabu, E & Malimbwi, R.E Department of Forest Mensuration and Management (SUA)

  2. Introduction • Carbon trade involves the sale of carbon credits. • There are two main types of Carbon Trading Schemes that are operating globally to-date: • Voluntary Carbon Trading (VCT), and • The official Kyoto Protocol Carbon Trading Mechanisms. • Carbon benefit of any forest carbon project = carbon changes to known levels of precision. • Determination of carbon changes requires baselines

  3. Baselines • Baseline: historical trends against which additional carbon benefits as a result of carbon project can be determined. • Baseline and monitoring schemes • individual project, • regional e.g Eastern Arc, and • national levels • Requires reliable data on forest extent and stocking.

  4. What Should be Measured? • Forest Extent • Forest Stocks in Five IPCC pools: • aboveground, • belowground, • litter, • dead wood and • soil organic carbon • Widely accepted forest inventory procedures recommended by IPCC Good Practice Guide (IPCC, 2003) • CDM Approved LULUCF methodologies.

  5. Measurable Carbon changes • Sequestration/Enhancement • increases of forest biomass within areas of existing forest • Conservation • maintenance of a steady level of forest area and biomass density, • relate to forests that are already properly managed, e.g • protective forest reserves and • national parks • could be rewarded through a special “conservation” under REDD. • Reduction in emissions from deforestation • i.e. based on comparisons of rates of change of forest area over time, • Reductions in emissions from degradation • reductions in biomass/carbon stock in the forest without loss of forest area,

  6. Principles of Baseline Construction • Net-net accounting: • compares emissions or removal in the commitment period to those of a reference scenario i.e historical base year (e.g. 1990) or base period (e.g. 1990-2000), • Gross-net accounting: • Measurements of change of carbon stock are compared only over the commitment period itself. • Measure stock at the beginning of the project and compares this to the future

  7. Baseline for Deforestation • Principle: • a reference scenario from a historical period and net-net accounting. • Based on remotely sensed data over a historical period which shows change in area covered by forest. • Then data on carbon stock in different types of forest are used to calculate the change in terms of tons of carbon. • May be projected into the future and used to credit the additional mitigation benefit of the project • Challenges: • Setting reference base year • Carbon stock data highly variable: national forest inventory not undertaken • Assumes carbon stock per unit area is constant

  8. FAO: FRA 2005 • Tanzania used satellite imagery interpreted data of: • 1984 (Millington and Towsend, 1989) and compared these with • 1995 Hunting Technical Services (1997) for the determination of land cover changes in the country. • Annual deforestation = 412,000 ha • Average stocking 36 m3/ha from CEEST, (1999) • Carbon data are reported with their statistical confidence intervals (expressed as  values) at known precision level. • Most previous studies had low precision levels due to low sampling intensity adopted. • Moreover, they cover only a few forests.

  9. Baseline for Degradation • Look at rates of biomass loss within the forest • This is not visible in remote sensing • Need ground measurements: No previous quality data • Possible to use one of the following techniques: • advanced remote sensing techniques (LiDAR), • harvesting estimates from the local people, • harvesting estimates from stumps counts, • default values (rule of thumb)/modelling, or • harvesting estimates from control sites. • Will be captured together with enhancement under gross-net accounting

  10. Normal growth pattern Growth Degradation Present stock Protective for. Present stock Productive For Time (years) Start Measurements Forest Degradation & Enhancement Baselines • No previous data on forest degradation & enhancement • Protective forest: to determine the rate of recovery • Productive forests: to determine the rate of degradation Recover toward the threshold Baseline Degrd. Start of mgt

  11. Establishment of Baseline at National Level • Carryout national forest inventory to establish deforestation rates and stocking levels • Determine land use cover changes for the period of 1975 to 1990 to 2000 to 2007 using Landsat TM (FAO, 2007) • Conduct case studies to quantify emission factors for different forest types • Identify drivers of deforestation • Training on national forest inventories and remote sensing • Development of tools for assessment and monitoring of deforestation • Monitoring in PSP/LiDAR technology to capture forest enhancement and/or degradation levels.

  12. Establishment of Baselines at Projects Level • Review and synthesize existing studies on degradation/ growth rates • Development and testing of methodologies to measure and monitor enhancement and/or forest degradation • Development of tools, guidelines and manual for degradation assessment and monitoring • Carryout assessment and monitoring of forest degradation in demonstration projects for establishing historic degradation emission factors including cost implications, and accuracy level

  13. Carbon Assessment & Monitoring by Local Communities • This is a strategy to involve local communities in order to reduce the transaction costs of measuring carbon • Local communities were trained and tasked to conduct the measurements • Techniques were developed to measure and monitor carbon stock. • They are: • User friendly to the users - i.e.to the communities • reliable and • presented in a format acceptable to the scientific community

  14. The equipment Consists of: • A handheld computer with ArcPadTM 6.0 software and connected to GPS • It is easy to use • Is used to locate: • forestry boundaries • sample plots and • recording measurement data • With a step-by-step guide to the procedures, local communities were trained in a short time and were able to use the system effectively

  15. Steps in Carbon Assessment • Forest mapping/stratification • Pilot survey to estimate variance and number of sample plots • Locate the sample plots on the ground • Measure the dbh of all trees • Set out the sub-plots for the grasses, herb and litter data • Take soil samples randomly within the plot

  16. Locating sample plots on ground

  17. Measurements taken from the plot

  18. Other forest types

  19. Data analysis The following trees stand parameters were computed: • Density i.e. the number of stems per ha (N) • Basal area per hectare (Dominance)(G) • Volume per ha (V) and • Dry biomass / carbon (tones per ha) • Trees volume and biomass were computed using tested local existing allometric functions for the areas. • Computation were fitted on Ms Access database

  20. Results

  21. Conclusions & Recommendations • Methods exists to assess and measure forest carbon, however these are complex to the users • More studies are required for the Development of user friendly tools for the assessment and monitoring forest carbon

  22. The End! Thank You!!! Ahsanteni Sana!!!

More Related