1 / 29

PSE Delta Q Project Results

PSE Delta Q Project Results. Bruce Manclark, Delta T Bob Davis, Ecotope RTF meeting, 5 January 2009. Puget Sound Energy Delta Q Project Description. 40 homes divided into two groups 20 homes received PTCS duct sealing 20 homes received a two stage duct sealing procedure

matana
Download Presentation

PSE Delta Q Project Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PSE Delta Q Project Results Bruce Manclark, Delta T Bob Davis, Ecotope RTF meeting, 5 January 2009

  2. Puget Sound Energy Delta Q Project Description • 40 homes divided into two groups • 20 homes received PTCS duct sealing • 20 homes received a two stage duct sealing procedure • High pressure holes first • Low pressure holes next • Time accounting of each activity (overhead, testing, sealing)

  3. The Tests • Duct Blaster: two point (25 and 50 Pa) test of supply + return plus one side (other side leakage determined by subtraction). • Delta Q (series of automated blower door tests with air handler off and on) • Sum of the flows: comparing air handler flow (measured with TrueFlow) to calibrated flow hood hood measurements. • Testing was performed after each round of duct repair.

  4. The Quick Summary • Delta Q is not a test for (most) field crews to use. • Delta Q can be a valuable part of program design and QA. • Duct sealing is cheap, it’s the bidding, the testing and the driving that cost too much. • Duct sealing is a lousy description; duct repair (reconstruction?) is better. • Some homes need experts to diagnose and fix them. (But most do not.)

  5. What is Delta Q? • Duct leakage measurement method • Measures supply & return leakage to outside at operating conditions • Originally proposed about 10 YO; specifics of testing developed by Ecotope, LBNL, BNL in late 90s onward • Univ of Illinois Small Bldgs Research Council (SBRC) completed report last summer on updated method • Requires blower door with automated control and specialized software • Best suited to existing construction (typically leakier and not subject to pass/fail testing)

  6. The Big Problems With The Duct Blaster Test • It measures leakage at one pressure at one point in the system. • No programs require 2 point tests (25 and 50); this would at least enable error checking • Most programs do not encourage/require split system testing. • It’s sort of complicated. • It takes too much time. • It’s easy to do wrong. • It’s tempting to lie, especially on the pre-sealing number…

  7. Leakage at operating conditions varies greatly +2 125 +50 Duct Blaster Testing tests with the entire duct system at the same pressure

  8. The Not So Dry Hole “an oil well that has been drilled but that produces no oil, or not enough to make it economically profitable” • Don’t duct seal ducts in conditioned space • Don’t waste time on (most) returns in the NW • Always duct seal the high pressure holes regardless of Duct Blaster number

  9. Insert Cites data • Total dropped from 209 CFM@ 50 Pa to 111 CFM@ 50Pa. • The supply only leakage was reduced from 144 CFM@ 50Pa to 74 CFM@ 50Pa. • BUT.. delta Q estimated supply leakage at 125cfm • After cut in: delta Q reported 45 CFM

  10. The Cites Residence(a small epiphany)

  11. Floor Insulation Crews Can Really Destroy Duct Systems Duct Sealing can’t happen without duct repair

  12. The House of No Return Some Jobs Need an Expert

  13. Where the time went

  14. Directions • Drive the cost of duct repairs down, not up • No bidding • No random drives in Puget Land • No one at a time buying (buy in bulk) • Increased QA • Give it away (because its cheaper that way, at least when bundled with other services)

  15. More Directions • Improve duct training • More specifics (how to fix typical problems with very clear, visual instructions. Use 21st century graphics programs.) • Include program managers • Fix the holes that matter • Negotiate pricing with delivery contractors • Develop expert contractors

  16. Testing directives? • Supply side testing • TrueFlow on returns vs TF at return slot

  17. Cost Effectiveness • Use 1850 ft2 prototype (3 vintages) • Seattle TMY3 weather (so far) • Feed supply and return leakage fractions (from delta Q, TrueFlow, and measured plenum static pressures) into SEEM • Compare median as-found leak fractions for both “high pressure” and “50% reduction (PTCS) cases to midpoint (“high pressure” cases only) and final values to find savings • Use 20 year measure life and 2 discount rates to find levelized cost of savings • Heat pump control mix same as RTF mix for base case

More Related