1 / 8

HIGHER PE

HIGHER PE. Focussed Data Collection. Why???. After analysing my stroke repertoire observation schedule and video analysis, it was evident that my main weakness in badminton is my overhead clear. Therefore, I used 2 methods of focussed data collection to look at the clear in more detail….

maxim
Download Presentation

HIGHER PE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HIGHER PE Focussed Data Collection

  2. Why??? • After analysing my stroke repertoire observation schedule and video analysis, it was evident that my main weakness in badminton is my overhead clear. Therefore, I used 2 methods of focussed data collection to look at the clear in more detail…..

  3. TECHNIQUE ANALYSIS OBSERVATION SCHEDULE

  4. Method 1: Technique Analysis Observation Schedule Process: • Watched a model performer as many times as necessary to gain set criteria (P.A.R/sub routines) • Having written criteria in the form of a technique analysis observation schedule my Clear was observed in a feeder drill. • An observer sat at the side of the court and watched whilst a feeder played high serves to the back of the court as many times as necessary for me to side step back, return the clear and recover to base. • The observer put a tick or cross next to each criteria to highlight whether it was a strength or weakness.

  5. Technique Analysis Observation Schedule Why Appropriate? • Model performer paints a visual picture of what the shot should look like. (Mechanics and flightpath) • Permanent record due to written format for comparison at a later date. • Comparison to a model allowed identification of strengths and weaknesses in sub routines. • Through observing the model it motivates you to strive to reach the same standard. • Objective feedback – Non bias • Allows training priorities and goals to be made specific to your flaws. • Closed environment for assessment so that you and the observer can isolate the weakness.

  6. Court Diagram Observation Schedule Process • 1 set against an opponent of equal ability. • An observer sat and recorded the outcome of my overhead clears. • An observer recorded where my clears were played from and to on the court.

  7. Court Diagram Observation Schedule Why? Why? Why? • TECHNIQUE ANALYSIS PLUS COURT DIAGRAM = MORE RELIABLE AND VALID RESULTS • Tells you the flight path and outcome of the clears which are not highlighted in the TAOS providing a more holistic view of performance. • Objective Non bias feedback again. • Converted to statistics which are hard to argue with. • Reinforces TAOS findings based on placement. • Written evidence which can be used as a comparison at a later date. • Competitive game places the clear under pressure when against equal opponent.

  8. Why use model performers? • Paints a visual picture of how a skill should be performed. (visual feedback When and why?) • Provides us with set criteria (P.A.R) • Provides a bench mark a starting point to develop performance. • Allows us to make comparison to identify strengths and weaknesses in our sub routines. (Detect flaws) • Based on the results we can set realistic training goals and priorities related to stage of learning. • Through observing a model it motivates us to strive to reach the same standard. • Can be used to gauge improvements following a period of practice. • Range and quality of movements of an automatic player highlighted

More Related