1 / 16

Shell structure: ~ 1 MeV

Mass measurements of n-rich nuclei Collective Structure and the Microscopic Drivers of Structural Evolution. Shell structure: ~ 1 MeV Quantum phase transitions: ~ 100s keV Collective effects: ~ 100s keV

merry
Download Presentation

Shell structure: ~ 1 MeV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mass measurements of n-rich nuclei Collective Structure and the Microscopic Drivers of Structural Evolution • Shell structure: ~ 1 MeV • Quantum phase transitions: ~ 100s keV • Collective effects: ~ 100s keV • Interaction filters: ~ 10-15 keV Binding energies, Separation energies: Collectivity, symmetries, quantum phase transitions What is the origin of simple patterns in complex nuclei? Double differences of masses – Interaction filters: p-n interactions What is the nature of the nuclear force that binds protons and neutrons? Macro Micro

  2. Collective contributions to masses can vary significantly for small parameter changes in collective models. Masses: complementary observable to spectroscopic data in pinning down structure. Particularly important far off stability where data will be sparse S2n(Coll.) for two calcs. S2n(Coll.) for two calcs. B.E.(z,c) B.E (MeV) Er Gd Examples of IBA calculations of rare earth nuclei

  3. Microscopic perspective Valence Proton-Neutron Interaction Development of configuration mixing, collectivity and deformation – competition with pairing Changes in single particle energies and magic numbers Partial history: Goldhaber and de Shalit (1953); Talmi (1962); Federman and Pittel ( late 1970’s); Casten et al (1981); Heyde et al (1980’s); Nazarewicz, Dobacewski et al (1980’s); Otsuka et al( 2000’s) and many others.

  4. Measurements of p-n Interaction Strengths Average p-n interaction between last two protons and last two neutrons Vpn (Z,N)  =  ¼ [ {B(Z,N) - B(Z, N-2)}  -  {B(Z-2, N) - B(Z-2, N-2)} ] Ref: J.-y. Zhang and J. D. Garrett

  5. 126 82 LOW j, HIGH n HIGH j, LOW n 50 82 Orbit dependence of p-n interactions p-n interaction is short range similar orbits give larger p-n interactions Largest p-n interactions if proton and neutron shells have filling fractional filling

  6. Empirical p-n interaction strengths indeed strongest along diagonal. But quantitative microscopic calculations needed Empirical p-n interaction strengths stronger in like regions than unlike regions. New Xe masses (ISOLTRAP/ ISOLDE) Neidherr et al Nazarewicz, Stoitsov, Satula Though DFT gives masses only to ~ 1 MeV, the filter allows us to study subtle, important correlation effects at the 10-30 keV level.

  7. Two regions of parabolic anomalies. Two regions of octupole correlations Possible signature?

  8. Backups

  9. Sn – Magic: no valence p-n interactions Critical role of the valence p-n interaction Both valence protons and neutrons NpNn Scheme

  10. Z  82 , N < 126 Z  82 , N < 126 3 1 1 2 3 2 1 82 50 82 126   Z > 82 , N < 126 Z > 82 , N > 126

  11. 208Hg 208Hg

  12. p-n interactions and the evolution of structure Direct correlation of observed growth rates of collectivity with empirical p-n interaction strengths

  13. W. Nazarewicz, M. Stoitsov, W. Satula Realistic Calculations Microscopic Density Functional Calculations with Skyrme forces and different treatments of pairing

More Related