1 / 18

Week 10: Compensation & Benefits

Week 10: Compensation & Benefits. Agenda for Today Discuss reasons why pay sometimes motivates and sometimes it does not Discuss Pay-for-performance plans from individual, group and corporate perspectives Discuss major approaches to making compensation decisions

michelem
Download Presentation

Week 10: Compensation & Benefits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Week 10: Compensation & Benefits Agenda for Today • Discuss reasons why pay sometimes motivates and sometimes it does not • Discuss Pay-for-performance plans from individual, group and corporate perspectives • Discuss major approaches to making compensation decisions • In-class exercise: Ethical Compensation Dilemmas

  2. Compensation and Rewards • Extrinsic Rewards • Monetary • Wage and salary • Commissions and bonuses • Benefits • Intrinsic Rewards • Recognition, promotion opportunities, working conditions, nature of work

  3. Objectives of Good Compensation • Attract Good Applicants • Market competitiveness • Wage surveys • External equity • Retain Good Employees • External and internal equity • Procedural Justice: perceived fairness of the process and procedures used to make decisions about employees • Distributive Justice: Perceived fairness in the distribution of outcomes • Job evaluation • Motivate Employees??

  4. Does Pay Motivate?? YES! • Reinforcement Theory • Pay is positive reinforcement • Expectancy Theory • Motivation: Expectancy * Instrumentality * Valence (E*I*V) • High Effort High Perf. (Expectancy link) • High Perf.Valued Monetary Rewards (Instrumentality link) • Valued Monetary RewardsPay Satisfaction (Valence Link) • Equity Theory • Social comparison of inputs and outputs • If paid less for same or more effort = less effort • Actions to restore equity

  5. Does Pay Motivate?? NO! • Maslow’s Need Hierarchy Theory • Pay is lower-order need, once it is satisfied it no longer motivates, move on to higher order needs • Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory • Motivators and Hygiene factors • Pay is Hygiene Factor – presence will not motivate • Motivation comes from presence of motivators (recognition, job enrichment) • Deci’s Theory of Intrinsic Motivation • Intrinsic rewards are gained from certain activities • Extrinsic rewards decrease intrinsic motivation

  6. Does Pay Motivate?? COMPROMISE • Individual differences in response to pay as a motivator • Need pay, but don’t rely on it as a sole motivator • Pay loses potency over time • Establish clear performance-reward contingencies • Good performance appraisal system; feedback • Make sure employees have skills, abilities, and resources needed to do the job (selection; training, development) • Ensure Equity (perceived and actual) • Money is not for everyone: determine individual reinforcers (reinforcement buffet)

  7. Major Issues in Compensation: Overview • Pay-for-Performance • Fixed vs. variable Pay • Performance vs. Membership • Job vs. Individual Pay • Open vs. Secret Pay Policy • Egalitarianism vs. Elitism • Monetary vs. Nonmonetary Rewards • Below-Market vs. Above Market Compensation • Centralizations vs. Decentralization of Pay Decisions

  8. Pay-for-Performance • Incentive system that rewards employee performance • Performance rather than entitlement orientation • Assumptions: • Individuals and teams differ in their contributions to firm • Performance based pay will affect attraction, retention, and motivation of high-performing employees • Assumes that performance appraisals are done well

  9. Pay-for-Performance – Advantages & Disadvantages • Advantages: • Merit based • Based on objective rather than subjective criteria • Disadvantages: • “Do only what you get paid for” syndrome • Employee focus on rewarded measures of job & ignore other important aspects of work (e.g., quality or service) • Possibly manipulate the system • Negative effects on cooperation: increases competition • Lack of control over factors affecting performance • Performance of other group members, job support, materials • Leads to job dissatisfaction and stress • Difficulties in measuring performance (individual and team) • Encourages short-term orientation (performance over a year) • Psychological contracts may be broken when system changed • Lack of confidence in the system (“is it really fair?”)

  10. How to Establish Effective Pay-for-Performance Incentive Systems • Determine if it is appropriate for the job • Is it piece rate? -- absolutely • Other knowledge-based work? What is the product? • Reinforce with other HR systems • E.g., performance appraisals, selection, employee training • Build Employee Trust • Does it pay for me to work harder? • Does anyone notice extra efforts? • Promote belief that performance makes a difference • Use multiple layers of rewards (individual and team) • Involve employees in design of play plan • Complement with non-financial rewards

  11. Pay-for Performance (P-F-P) Plans : Individual • Examples: merit pay, piece-rate, commissions, bonuses • Advantages: • Helps achieve individual equity • Ties with expectancy theory, goal theory, reinforcement theory • Fit in well with individualistic cultures • Disadvantages: • Creates competition and destroys cooperation among peers • General pitfalls of P-F-P plans most evident at individual level • Conditions under which most likely to succeed: • When contributions of individual employees can be accurately isolated • When job demands autonomy • When cooperation is less critical; competition is encouraged

  12. Pay-for-Performance Plans: Team Incentives • Advantages: • Fosters group cohesiveness • Reflects current work performance more realistically: more effective measurement tool • Disadvantages: • Lack of fit with individualistic corporate cultures • Free-riders • Social pressures to limit performance • Difficulties in identifying meaningful groups • Intergroup competition leading to a decline in overall perf. • Conditions under which most likely to succeed: • When high task interdependence within group • When there are independent tasks between groups • When objective is to foster self-managed work groups

  13. Pay-for-Performance Plans: Organizational • Examples: gainsharing, profit-sharing, ESOP • Advantages: • Increases employee commitment; promotes employee ownership • Provides financial flexibility for firm (cost is automatically adjusted downward during economic downturn) • Tax advantages to the firm • Disadvantages: • Profits vary from year to year – employees financial well-being may be at considerable risk • Payoff removed from employee efforts • Stock risks – long-run financial difficulties • Conditions under which most likely to succeed: • Large corporations with interdependent business units (difficult to target contributions of individual business units) • Along with other individual and team incentive programs

  14. Job vs. Individual Pay • Knowledge-based or skill-based pay: employees paid on the basis of jobs they can do • Base level of pay increased with ability to do other jobs • Employees move from job to job as needed • Advantages: • Increases staffing flexibility • Reduces costs of turnover and absenteeism • Motivational effects: job rotation • Disadvantages: • Loss of labor specialization • Greater difficulty in selecting applicants because qualifications are less specific • Workplace chaos if not managed properly

  15. Job vs. Individual Pay (contd.) • Knowledge-based systems work best when: • There are limited opportunities for upward mobility • There is high change in technology and organizational structure • The workforce is educated and has the ability and willingness to learn new jobs • Teamwork and participation is stressed • There are opportunities to learn new skills • There are high costs associated with absenteeism and turnover

  16. Open vs. Secret Pay Policy • Advantages to Open Pay Policy: • When compensation is secret, people believe they are more underpaid than they really are • Forces managers to be more fair and effective in administering compensation • Bad decisions cannot be hidden • Good decisions motivate others • Disadvantages: • Managers forced to defend decisions publicly • May give everyone the same raise to avoid conflict; demotivates high performers • Pay becomes political – unleashes jealousy, conflict • Use Open Pay Policy: • Egalitarian culture with employee involvement • Cultures with trust and commitment

  17. Elitism vs. Egalitarianism • Egalitarianism: employees under the same compensation system (i.e., all employees eligible for stock options) • Reduces barriers between employees • Allows reassignment of employee to different area without changing compensation package • More common in highly competitive environment • Elitism: different compensation systems for different groups • Increases stability; have to stay in organization and move up through the ranks to get stock options • More common in older, well- established firms with mature products

  18. Other Compensation Questions • Monetary vs. Nonmonetary Rewards? • Non-monetary rewards: interesting work, job security, work sabbaticals, flexible work, benefits, overseas transfers, extensive training and development • Use combination; contingent upon employee, position, company orientation and culture • Below Market vs. Above Market Compensation? • Depends on labor market, position, technology, geographical location • Implications for turnover, organizational commitment, getting and keeping top performers • Pay Decisions Centralized vs. Decentralized? • Centralizations may be cost-effective; hire compensation specialist • Centralization increases internal equity, but may be less in touch with external market • Decentralization better in large and diverse organizations

More Related