1 / 47

Lecture 19: Community Dynamics (Non-Equilibrium)

Lecture 19: Community Dynamics (Non-Equilibrium) . EEES 3050. Equilibrium vs. non-equilibrium. Equilibrium: Define: communities in which species abundances remain constant or stable over time. Nature is in a “state of balance”. Non-equilibrium:

mignon
Download Presentation

Lecture 19: Community Dynamics (Non-Equilibrium)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 19: Community Dynamics (Non-Equilibrium) EEES 3050

  2. Equilibrium vs. non-equilibrium • Equilibrium: • Define: communities in which species abundances remain constant or stable over time. • Nature is in a “state of balance”. • Non-equilibrium: • Define: communities in species abundances do not remain constant. Abundances continually change.

  3. Non-equilibrium systems: • Non-equilibrium: • Define: communities in species abundances do not remain constant. Abundances continually change. • What mechanisms can cause species abundances to change? • Heterogeneity • Succession • Disturbance • Immigration • Extinction

  4. Equilibrium systems. • Classical Competition theory • Population growth deterministic • Homogeneous environment • Competition is only significant biological interaction • Coexistence requires a stable equilibrium point. • Non-equilibrium systems: • Environments are heterogeneous • Environments change, i.e. disturbance • These are two of the main themes of Landscape Ecology.

  5. Heterogeneity • The environment has pattern and the configuration and composition effect the processes within an ecological system. • Typically thought of in terms of patches • Configuration • Connectivity • Dominance • Edges

  6. Heterogeneity • What does heterogeneity effect? • Abundance • Distribution of resources • Flow of nutrients, water, carbon • Movement of organisms

  7. How is local movement affected by heterogeneous landscapes? • Example: • Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes: an experiment with Eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie. • By Crist, Guertin, Wiens and Milne

  8. Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes • What were the basic questions? • What is the effect patch type on animal movement? • Patches can be bare ground, grass, shrub or cactus • What is the effect of grazing intensity on animal movement?

  9. Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes • Methods: • 3 species • 3 habitat types based on grazing intensity • Beetle paths: • Followed beetles for 100 time steps (5 sec steps) • Marked location after every 5 seconds. • Mapped in a GIS

  10. Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes • Quantifying paths: • Mean step length • Mean turning angle • Mean vector length • Net displacement • Fractal dimension

  11. Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes

  12. Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes • Cover type matters for net displacement.

  13. Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes • Grazing matters for some species.

  14. Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes • Conclusions: • Beetle movement affected at 2 different scales. • Vegetation type and grazing treatment

  15. Disturbance • Disturbances are relatively discrete events in time that disrupt ecosystem, community or population structure and change resources, substrate availability or the physical environment.

  16. Disturbance terminology • Distribution: • Spatial distribution • Frequency: • Mean number of events per time period • Return Interval: • 1/frequency • Rotation period: • Mean time need to disturb area equivalent of study area • Predictability: • An inverse function of variance of the return interval

  17. Disturbance terminology • Area or size: • Area disturbed (can be described in many ways compared to event or time period) • Magnitude: • Intensity • Physical force • Severity • Effects on the community • Synergism • Effects on the occurrence of other disturbances. • Recovery time • Amount of time to return to previous condition.

  18. Local vs. Global Stability

  19. Non-equil. Example 1: Fire

  20. Disturbance Example 1: Fire • Observation: • Yellowstone fire of 1988 affected >250,000 ha, creating a mosaic of burn severities. • Main question: • How did fire size affect post fire succession?

  21. Disturbance Example 1: Fire • Hypotheses:

  22. Disturbance Example 1: Fire • Hypotheses:

  23. Disturbance Example 1: Fire • Methods: • At each of three sites, different sized patches were analyzed. • Small (1-2 ha) • Medium (80-200 ha) • Large (480 – 3698) • Response variables: • Biotic cover • Lodgepole pine seedling density • Opportunistic species

  24. Results: Size of fire • Prediction: • Greater in smaller patches

  25. Results: Burn severity • Prediction: • Decreasing cover with increasing burn severity

  26. Results: Richness • Prediction: • Burn severity: • Greatest is severe-surface. • Lower in light-surface. • Lowest in crown fire. • Patch size: no effect

  27. Results Yes Yes No Yes & No

  28. Non-equil Example 2: Coral Reefs • Observations: • Coral reefs have a very high diversity • At the northern edge of the Great Barrier Reef, over 1500 species of fish have been recorded. • Question: • Q1: Are corals in equilibrium when they are impacted frequently by tropical storms? • Q2: How do these fish species coexist?

  29. Q1: Are corals in equilibrium when they are impacted frequently by tropical storms? • Hypothesis: • In an equilibrium system, recruitment rates should be… • consistent, or at least density dependent. • Methods: • Examine recruitment rates through time in areas protected from storms compared to areas exposed to storms.

  30. Results: Recruitment was highly variable. • Supports non-equilibrium hypothesis.

  31. Non-equil Example 2: Coral Reefs • Q2: How do these fish species coexist? • Two competing hypothesis: • Equilibrium Hypothesis: • Populations controlled by density dependent processes • Each species has a highly specialized niche. • Niche diversification hypothesis. • Non-equilibrium hypothesis: • Larval recruitment is unpredictable. • Competition is present, but winner cannot be predicted. • Lottery hypothesis

  32. Non-equil Example 2: Coral Reefs • How to test these hypotheses? • Test the specialization of fish species • Feeding • Habitat • Method: • Talbot et al. (1978) put out artificial reefs. • Measured colonization by different species • Measured turnover rates.

  33. Non-equil Example 2: Coral Reefs • Results: Similarity was low, ranging from 14 to 47% similar. • Supports lottery hypothesis.

  34. Lottery hypothesis • Three requirements: • Environmental variation such that it permits each species to have high recruitment rates at low population densities. • Generations must overlap • Adult death rates should be unaffected by competition. • When this occurs: reef communities retain high regional diversity in a continually fluctuating environment.

  35. Theoretical models for non-equilibrium systems • Four types of models: • Fluctuating environment • Density independent • Directional changing environment • Slow competitive displacement.

  36. Fluctuating environment • Based on classical equilibrium model • Adds temporal variability • Competition still major biological interaction. • Seasonal fluctuations do not allow one species to dominate.

  37. Fluctuating environment • Density of Daphnia in a Eunice Lake. • Changes with season.

  38. Density independent • Assume population densities changes • These changes are density independent. • That is birth and death rates do not depend on density • Competition for resources is rare.

  39. Directional changing environment • These models consider history: • Changes in climate • Previous land use

  40. Directional changing environment • Example: current and potential range of American beech under 2 climate-change scenarios.

  41. Slow competitive displacement. • If competitive abilities are nearly equal, competitive exclusion will be very slow. • In this situation, community structure is strongly affected by chance. • Example: Tree in tropical forests

  42. Community persistence in non-equilibrium systems.

  43. Community persistence in non-equilibrium systems. • Mechanisms • Stabilizing mechanisms • Disturbance • Compensatory • Integration in larger landscape

More Related