1 / 20

WTO NAMA NEGOTIATIONS: ILLUSTRATION ON SELECTED ISSUES

WTO NAMA NEGOTIATIONS: ILLUSTRATION ON SELECTED ISSUES. Saad Belghazi, Economist, consultant Beirut, November, 11, 2009 Email: belghazi@mtds.com. Plan. Building on Uruguay Round results NAMA negotiations process: present situation Negotiation Agenda Formula

minda
Download Presentation

WTO NAMA NEGOTIATIONS: ILLUSTRATION ON SELECTED ISSUES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WTO NAMA NEGOTIATIONS: ILLUSTRATION ON SELECTED ISSUES Saad Belghazi, Economist, consultant Beirut, November, 11, 2009 Email: belghazi@mtds.com

  2. Plan • Building on Uruguay Round results • NAMA negotiations process: present situation • Negotiation Agenda • Formula • Some comments from the Arab countries and Morocco point of view

  3. I – Building on Uruguay Round results

  4. Reminding the GATT aims and mechanisms • Aims • raising standards of living, ensuring full employment and a large and steadily growing volume of real income and effective demand, • expanding the production of and trade in goods and services, • allowing for the optimal use of the world’s resources in accordance with the objective of sustainable development • Mechanisms • Trade as a way to enhance domestic competition, improve commodities supply and reduce monopoly inefficiencies • Non discriminatory market access

  5. Results of the Uruguay Round 1/2 • The countries commitments • Elimination of Non Tariff Protection (alleviation of subsidies; adoption of value rules) • Tariffs bound between negotiating partners • Tariffs reduction • Adaptations for developing countries • Tariff reduction: 24% during 10 years (versus 36% during 6 years for developed countries) • Delaying the custom value rule implementation (5 years – plus 3 years)

  6. Results of the Uruguay Round 2/2 • The NAMA products importance • 90 % of the World exports. • Negotiations impacts • Developed countries: average tariffs decrease from 6,3% to 3,8 %. • Developing Countries : rise of average bound lines from 21% to 73 % ; better trade predictability • Improvements resulting from the Uruguay Round appear insufficient • Tariffs too high • Persistence of tariffs peaks • Tariffs escalation

  7. II - NAMA negotiations process: present situation

  8. NAMA Doha Agenda NAMA negotiation aim Following the paragraph 16 of the Doha Ministerial Declaration, • “To reduce or as appropriate eliminate tariffs, including the reduction or elimination of high tariffs, tariff peaks and tariff escalation as well as Non-Tariff Barriers, in particular on products of export interest to developing countries” • “The negotiations shall take fully into account the special needs and interests of developing and least-developed Members, including through less than full reciprocity in reduction commitments”

  9. Three crucial elements in the negotiation • To cut tariffs according to general formula based on a coefficient. Overall around 40 countries, which include the world's largest traders, will apply the formula. All the others have different specific provisions. • Flexibilities for developing countries (that would allow these countries to shelter limited percentages of their most sensitive sectors from the full impact of a reduction in tariffs). • Special treatment for small, vulnerable economies (31); least-developed countries (LDCs) (32); recently acceded members (RAMs) (13); members with low binding coverage (12); and others

  10. Advantages of the formula approach • Transparency • Each member will be enabled to know how the other decrease their tariffs • Efficiency • Formula approach is more simple than the bargaining process • Equity • The tariffs decreases result from rules and are independent from bargaining power • Predictability

  11. Formula adopted after the fourth revision – Report by December, 6, 2008 The following formula shall apply on a line-by-line basis:   {a or (x or y or z)} x t0 t1 = {a or (x or y or z)} + t0 where, • t1 = Final bound rate of duty • t0 = Base rate of duty • Coefficients • Developed Members: a = 8 • Developing Members: x = 20, y = 22, z = 25

  12. Elements regarding the formula • All HS chapters are included • Minimum 20% of bounded tariff lines et 9% of 1999-2001 imports • Tariffs Reduction base • Bound rates in 2001, after full implementation of current concessions • Calculus of non bound tariff • Non bound rates: applied rates plus 25 % • Non-ad valorem duties • All shall be converted to ad valorem equivalents and bound in ad valorem terms. • Implementation tariffs reduction calendar • All the first of January, after the entry in force of DDA • Developed Members : 6 reductions, in equal rates in 5 years • Developing Members : 11 reductions, in equal rates in 10 years

  13. Flexibilities on the formula for Developing Countries

  14. III - comments from the Arab countries and Morocco point of view

  15. Impacts on Arab Countries • Tariff binding situation • On 10 Arab Countries, members of WTO, participating to NAMA negotiations, 5 have bound 100 % of their tariff lines (Morocco, Djibouti, Oman, Qatar, UAE) and 3 near 100% (Kuwait, Jordan and Egypt) • Tunisia and Bahrain have bound respectively 51,1% and 71 % • Tariffs level • 4 countries have average bound tariffs level lower than 30% (Oman, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Jordan), • 1 country has a tariff close to 30 % (Egypt) • 4 countries have average bound tariffs higher than 35% (Morocco, Djibouti, Tunisia and Kuwait)

  16. Bound Duties for Non-agricultural Productsof Arab countries

  17. Results of the formula implementation for Arab Countries • Reduction of overall bound tariffs • the highest tariff is 20% (Kuwait) and the lowest is 7,92% (United Arab Emirates) • For each country, the results for the formula coefficients (20, 22 and 25) are very close • the tariff peaks disappeared • Using flexibilities • Only Bahrain and Tunisia may use the flexibility allowed by the choice of the coefficient x or y • The other countries would choose the z coefficient because they had already bound all or almost all their tariff lines.

  18. Simulation

  19. preferences: enhanced erosion • The Turkey and Quad partners did not introduce in the NAMA negotiation a list of products exception. • The results of the DDA on the NAMA negotiations would substantially reduce the preferential margins on these FTA partners markets.

  20. POLICY ISSUES Industrialization objectives: globalized value chains and local value chains Informal economy, inclusion and macroeconomic policy package For a new and consistent policy package: fiscal policy and incentives to local development and new status to VSE in development policy

More Related