1 / 39

Standardization of In America

Safe Command Systems. Standardization of In America. I. DAVID DANIELS. Assistant Chief Safety and Employee Services. Seattle Fire Department. In This Presentation:. Is There Really a Problem? Signs of “Command System Dysfunction” Moving Towards “Best Practice”. Is There A Problem?.

moke
Download Presentation

Standardization of In America

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Safe Command Systems Standardization ofIn America

  2. I. DAVID DANIELS Assistant Chief Safety and Employee Services Seattle Fire Department

  3. In This Presentation: • Is There Really a Problem? • Signs of “Command System Dysfunction” • Moving Towards “Best Practice”

  4. Is There A Problem?

  5. “The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them” Albert Einstein

  6. The U. S. Fire Problem • One of the highest fire death rates in the industrialized world (14.9 deaths per million population). • Annually, fire kills more Americans than all natural disasters combined. • Fire is the 3rd leading cause of accidental death in the home • 80 % of all fire deaths occur in residences.

  7. The U. S. Fire Problem • About 2 million fires are reported each year. • It is estimated that over 40 percent of residential fires and three-fifths of residential fatalities occur in homes with no smoke alarms • Direct property loss due to fires is estimated at $8.6 billion annually • Americans accept fire as an inevitability.

  8. “Two hundred years of tradition, uninhibited by progress” Ancient American Fire Service Proverb

  9. American Fire Service • To often, accepts FF serious injury or deaths as “hazard of the profession”. • Wear “most dangerous profession” as a “badge of honor”. • Being scrutinized more than ever by communities, employees and government. • To often wait until we are forced to change.

  10. American Fire Service • Averaged over 90,000 injuries per year in the 1990’s and was over 95,000 for the first four years of the decade. • On average, 45% of these injuries occurred on the fire ground. • Over the period of the 90’s there were an average of 96 firefighter fatalities on the job.

  11. Duty Firefighter Fatalities

  12. Compared to Canada... • Or the years 1993 - 1997, the Canadian Center for Occupational Safety and Health reports only 18 fatalities total in all of public safety employees (police fire and EMS). • The absence of information on firefighter deaths suggests that the problem is not as wide spread, if it exists at all.

  13. Explanations for the Problem • “Most of the firefighter fatalities are volunteers” (Does it matter?) • “Firefighters aren’t as tough as the once were” (Neither are the structures they enter) • “Over half of the fatalities are heart attacks” (Another example has tough we are not?) • “There are too many inexperienced chiefs” (Welcome to the 21st century!)

  14. Signs of Command System Dysfunction

  15. Command Dysfunction • Is a systemic failure in the incident management system of an organization or jurisdiction. • Has six major symptoms. • Contributes every instance of multi-firefighter emergency scene fatality and a significant majority of single instances.

  16. Dysfunction's Impact • The American fire service averaged 96 fatalities a year in the decade of the 90’s. • from 1995- 99, averaged 17 instances a year when more than one firefighter died at the same incident. • 71% of the multiple firefighter deaths during this period can be traced directly to command dysfucntion.

  17. Single vs. Multiple FF Fatality

  18. Six Symptoms • Lack of Risk Assessment • Lack of Responder Discipline • Lack or Misuse of the Incident Management System • Ineffective Incident Commanders • Lack of Accountability • Poor Communications

  19. Risk Assessment • Service level expectation and system capacity often don’t match. • “Heart” vs. “Head” response • Recognition and acceptance of levels of risk at the scene. • Resource allocation inconsistent with level of risk and potential benefits.

  20. Responder Discipline • Predetermined tactical operations despite the situation presented. • “Self deployment” of responding units without direction or coordination. • Tactical insubordination. • Responders are not “self limiting”.

  21. Lack or Misuse of IMS • System design or implementation. • Recognition of span of control issues. • Practice and “real world” conflicts • “Tactical addiction”

  22. Ineffective On-Scene Commanders • Inadequate training • Little or no strategic focus • Incident “Micro”-Management • “Urgency addiction”

  23. Accountability • Lack of a system. • Unwillingness to use the system. • Realism of system expectations • Coordination with incident activities

  24. Communications • Incident organizational structure • Scene communications plan • Technological challenges • Information overload

  25. Moving Towards “Best Practice”

  26. “If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will get you there” Unknown

  27. Incident Management Fallacies • Command personnel will learn through experience. • If an individual does an exceptional job as a firefighter or company officer, they will make a an exceptional incident commander. • IMS slows the progress of “putting the fire out”.

  28. Incident Management Facts • Fire prevention advances in the 20th century have minimized the opportunities for experience in the 21st century. • The “command” skill set is different from the “task orientation” of a firefighter. • IMS makes emergencies more efficient and effective.

  29. Safe Command Systems • Begin prior to the incident with physical and emotional fitness as well as quality training for all members. • Increase level of safety for responders by increasing the functionality of command. • Increase survivability for fire occupants through more efficient use of resources.

  30. Where Do We Lack? • Enough actual emergencies to hone the skills of command personnel. • There is no widely accepted “standard of care” for IMS. • Specific training for Command Officers to increase their command skill. • Verifiable methods of ensuring that command personnel are competent.

  31. Best Practice Models • Common frames of reference for the development of organizational policy. • Common foundations for performance standards. • A template for training standards. • A tool for evaluation of performance in the field.

  32. Who Must Lead the Move? • National Fire Service Incident Management Consortium • National Fire Protection Association • Firescope/National Wildfire Coordinating Group • IAFC/IAFF • Int’l Fire Service Accreditation Congress • Int’l Incident Management Foundation

  33. Nat’l Fire Service IMS Consortium • Continued development of IMS model procedures guides. • Continued research and development into IMS improvements such as the upgrade of the Safety Section. • Continued leadership in the coordination the efforts between other important IMS organizations.

  34. NFPA • Development of a professional qualification standard for the American fire service can best be implemented through the NFPA consensus process. • The decision on how to address this issue will be made at the Fall 2000 meeting of the NFPA.

  35. Firescope / NWCG • Should cooperate with the Consortium and the NFPA to ensure that necessary upgrades to the IMS are instituted. • Must be willing to assist the American structural fire service as it moves through the development process.

  36. IAFC and IAFF • It is important that the leaders of both management and labor recognize the connection between safe command systems and firefighter safety. • Cooperation between the two is paramount to any successes that might be achieved in the IMS arena.

  37. IFSAC • Is the entity best suitable to formalize the certification process once an NFPA consensus standard exists.

  38. International Command Foundation • World wide efforts to collect and identify IMS best practice will be critical factors in addressing IMS issues in America. • It is possible that the American fire service is not able conquer the many years of tradition through a single, internal approach, thus an opportunity to affect that change may exist.

  39. Other Needs • IMS specific training opportunities • IMS specific conferences and information exchanges • IMS training curriculum • IMS research and development efforts

More Related