1 / 35

AIM Through Safety Case

AIM Through Safety Case. IDEC – MUMBAI - MAY 2013. Introduction to Bureau Veritas. Bureau Veritas 2012 revenue: € 3,9bn. 8 Global Businesses. Well Balanced Portfolio. Broad Geographical Presence. GSIT. Marine & Offshore. Consumer Products. 7%. 12%. Asia Pacific. Americas. 11%. 23%.

monet
Download Presentation

AIM Through Safety Case

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AIM Through Safety Case IDEC – MUMBAI - MAY 2013

  2. Introduction to Bureau Veritas

  3. Bureau Veritas 2012 revenue: € 3,9bn 8 Global Businesses Well Balanced Portfolio Broad Geographical Presence GSIT Marine & Offshore Consumer Products 7% • 12% Asia Pacific Americas 11% 23% • 28% Industry 20% 18% Commodities 12% 9% 49% Europe, Middle East & Africa 12% Certification IVS Construction

  4. BV Offshore services Offshore Floating Units & Equipment Classification • Design review, survey of construction, inspection of equipment, supervision of installation to assess compliance with classification rules. • Maintenance of class in service through periodical inspections • Cover hull, mooring and topsides (PROC). • Design review, survey of construction, inspection of equipment, supervision of installation to assess compliance with specified standards and international regulations. • BV recognized by 130 Flag States for the implementation of international conventions (statutory) • Certification can be combined with classification Offshore Units & Equipment Certification Offshore Units Independent Verification • Risk based safety assessment scheme required by a national authority. • IVB can be combined with classification and certification • Project management • FEED review • Technical assistance services: risk analysis, hydrodynamics, mooring, structural strength and fatigue, vibrations and noise • Services to operators: Asset Integrity Management, Expertise Consulting & Outsourcing

  5. BV Involvement Project phases Approval type BV Certificates Concept • Concept Approval • Basic approval • Concept Design approval • Final concept approval • Qualification of unproven technology Concept / FEED Approval Certificate(s) Concept Design FEED Detailed Design Classification Certification Class Certificate Construction Installation In-Service In service survey Maintenance of Certificates

  6. Marine & Offshore Division : the global network Local plan approval offices Marine operations centre Regional training centre Survey stations • 4 MARINE ZONES • North Asia Zone • South Asia Zone • Europe, Africa and North Zone • Hellenic, Black Sea & Middle East Zone 16 Local Technical Centres & Plan Approval Offices 12 regional Marine Centres and Customer Support Centres 4 Regional Training Centres 2000 marine technical staff: naval architects, marine engineers and surveyors 180 survey stations in more than 90 countries

  7. FSO & FPSO: Class & Technical Assistance studies SKARV FPSOfor BP / STATOIL in Norway More than 120 FSOs & FPSOs studied by BV Present in all MODU types

  8. AIM Through Safety Case

  9. Asset Integrity Management Integrity Management (Duty Holder) • I.M. is responsible of safety and availability of the asset. • Needs Risk Ranking and Decision Making (Priorities) • It includes the follow-up and fullfilment of Class and Verification • Must keep track of all inspection/maintenance schedules Class & Flag Requirements Verification Requirements (SCEs) Inspection Services e.g. NDT, Visual Company Requirements (BCEs)

  10. Asset Integrity Management means… • Accountability, roles and responsabilities • Consistency • Competence • Management of Change • Data Management • Document Center: Categories (ex: hull, mooring, stability, topsides, SURF, stability, integrity management) • What should be considered as « Must Have »? Expert reports, processed inspection reports as opposed to raw data (nice-to-have)

  11. Asset Integrity Management means… • Risk Management Extract from the IADC HSE Case Guidelines and based on ISO IEC Guide 73:2002

  12. AIM & SAFETY CASE FACILITY DESCRIPTION FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SAFETY MEASURES EMERGENCIES RECORDS 5 YR REVISION NOPSEMA Safety Case Content and Level of Detail - N-04300-GN0106 - Revison 4, December 2011

  13. 3P’s: Plant, People and Processes Any operation requires equipment to execute an activity, people to operate and maintain the equipment and a business process to guide the operations and maintenance. CONTENT OF HSE CASE:

  14. DOCUMENT HIERARCHY Level 1: Overall Guidance Level 2: Specific Guidance Level 3: Generic Examples Level 4: Asset Specific

  15. 3P’s: Plant, People and Processes Plant; • Know the equipment – Asset Register in Hierarchical fashion. • Classify equipment according to criticality to HSE, Production etc. • Select appropriate tools to determine task requirements (task, frequency, man-power, spares and specialist tools etc.). • Have a management system in place to generate the work orders, record work history, provide management reports etc. • Keep the correct critical spares in the correct location(s). • Establish performance indicators, aligned with the equipment functionality to measure performance. Establish target values and have a Continuous Improvement process in place.

  16. Ergonomic Biological Psychological Chemical Physical Types of Hazards Health Hazards Individual Safety Hazards A source or a situation with a potential for harm in terms of human or ill-health, damage to property, damage to the environment, or a combination of these(AS / NZS 4804:1997). A hazard is defined as a situation with the potential for causing harm to human health or safety(NOPSEMA Control Measures and Performance Standards N-04300-GN0271 Dec.2011) A hazard is a situation that poses a level of threat to life, health, property, or environment. (Wikipedia)

  17. MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDS & MAJOR ACCIDENTS

  18. MAJOR ACCIDENT EVENTS As per the definition given in OPGGS(S) regulation 1.5, a major accident event is an event connected with a facility, including a natural event, having the potential to cause multiple fatalities of persons at or near the facility. Thus MAEs by definition are consequence based. Major accident events usually occur as a result of a combination of factors. Care needs to be taken during the formal safety assessment thatcombinations of events that could lead to high consequence incidents are not dismissed as ‘double contingency’ or ‘double jeopardy’ events. NOPSEMA Hazard Identification - N-04300-GN0107 - Revision 4, December 2011

  19. Major Accident Hazards (MAH) THE FIVE STAGES OF THE MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARD AND SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS • Identify Major Accident Hazards (MAH) • Identify Safety Critical Elements (SCEs) from these MAHs, • Identify Performance Standards (PS) for each SCE • Identify assurance processes that maintain or ensure continued suitability of the SCEs (i.e. that they meet PS requirements) • Verify all steps have been undertaken, and thus that MAHs are being controlled.

  20. SCE Identification SCE IDENTIFICATION PROCESS FLOW

  21. Safety Cases BOW TIE DIAGRAM A Bow Tie diagram displays the relationships between the major accident events, the associated causes and consequences, Safety Critical Elements and Activities and factors affecting SCE integrity

  22. Scope Of Work: Validation What Is Validation ?  Scope Of Validation Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment Identification Of Major Accident Events (MAES) Identification Of Barriers To Those MAES Forms the basis of Safety Critical Elements = EQUALS SUBJECT TO VALIDATION FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT (FSA)

  23. Control Measures & Performance Standards • Control measures include the physical features of a facility, and elements of the operator’s management system employed at the facility, that eliminate, prevent, reduce or mitigate the risk of major accident eventsand other hazardous events. They can take many forms including physical equipment, process control systems, management processes, operating or maintenance procedures, the emergency plan, key personnel and their actions • Preferential order should be considered when selecting controls. The hierarchy of control measures typically includes, in order of priority, elimination, prevention, reduction and mitigation. • The operator’s safety management system for a facility must specify the performance standards that apply. The performance standards are the parametersagainst which control measures for MAEsare assessed to ensure they reduce the risks to ALARP on an ongoing basis NOPSEMA Control Measures and Performance Standards Rev 3, December 2011- N-04300-GN0271

  24. Examples of Control Barriers

  25. SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM the SMS itself must meet the requirements of items (a) to (i), not necessarily the detailed description. NOPSEMA Safety Case Content and Level of Detail - N-04300-GN0106 - Revison 4, December 2011

  26. Safety Case Cycle STAGE 5 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES HER AND HEMP STAGE 1 IDENTIFY MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDS • VERIFICATION SCHEME  MAH SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Likelihood Consequence Risk FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT QRA, EERA , ESSA, NFHA, Dropped Object, Ship Collision, TRISIA, F&G Mapping, HAC, etc. DEMONSTRATION OF MAH & SCE MANAGEMENT STAGE 2 IDENTIFY SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS  SCE SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Avoid Prevent Control / Mitigate Emergency Response • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT REVIEW, SCHEDULED UPDATES, AND CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURES FACILITY HSE CASE STAGE 3 DEFINE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION Functionality Availability Reliability Survivability Interactions / Dependencies STAGE 4 DEVELOP / REVIEW AND IMPLEMENT ASSURANCE PROCESSES SAFETY CASE IMPLEMENTATION Test Inspect Maintain INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION STAGE 5 MANAGE NON-CONFORMING SCEs Identify Manage Interim Risk Until Resolution Repair / Replace / Redesign / Rectify INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION

  27. HER AND HEMP • VERIFICATION SCHEME Identify Manage Interim Risk Until Resolution Repair / Replace / Redesign / Rectify Safety Case Cycle STAGE 5 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES  MAH SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT QRA, EERA , ESSA, NFHA, Dropped Object, Ship Collision, TRISIA, F&G Mapping, HAC, etc. DEMONSTRATION OF MAH & SCE MANAGEMENT STAGE 2 IDENTIFY SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS  SCE SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Avoid Prevent Control / Mitigate Emergency Response • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT REVIEW, SCHEDULED UPDATES, AND CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURES FACILITY HSE CASE STAGE 3 DEFINE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION Functionality Availability Reliability Survivability Interactions / Dependencies STAGE 4 DEVELOP / REVIEW AND IMPLEMENT ASSURANCE PROCESSES SAFETY CASE IMPLEMENTATION Test Inspect Maintain INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION STAGE 5 MANAGE NON-CONFORMING SCEs INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION

  28. HER AND HEMP • VERIFICATION SCHEME Identify Manage Interim Risk Until Resolution Repair / Replace / Redesign / Rectify Safety Case Cycle STAGE 5 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES STAGE 1 IDENTIFY MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDS  MAH SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Likelihood Consequence Risk FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT QRA, EERA , ESSA, NFHA, Dropped Object, Ship Collision, TRISIA, F&G Mapping, HAC, etc. DEMONSTRATION OF MAH & SCE MANAGEMENT  SCE SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT REVIEW, SCHEDULED UPDATES, AND CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURES FACILITY HSE CASE STAGE 3 DEFINE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION Functionality Availability Reliability Survivability Interactions / Dependencies STAGE 4 DEVELOP / REVIEW AND IMPLEMENT ASSURANCE PROCESSES SAFETY CASE IMPLEMENTATION Test Inspect Maintain INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION STAGE 5 MANAGE NON-CONFORMING SCEs INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION

  29. HER AND HEMP • VERIFICATION SCHEME Identify Manage Interim Risk Until Resolution Repair / Replace / Redesign / Rectify Safety Case Cycle STAGE 5 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES STAGE 1 IDENTIFY MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDS  MAH SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Likelihood Consequence Risk FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT QRA, EERA , ESSA, NFHA, Dropped Object, Ship Collision, TRISIA, F&G Mapping, HAC, etc. DEMONSTRATION OF MAH & SCE MANAGEMENT STAGE 2 IDENTIFY SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS  SCE SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Avoid Prevent Control / Mitigate Emergency Response • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT REVIEW, SCHEDULED UPDATES, AND CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURES FACILITY HSE CASE INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION STAGE 4 DEVELOP / REVIEW AND IMPLEMENT ASSURANCE PROCESSES SAFETY CASE IMPLEMENTATION Test Inspect Maintain INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION STAGE 5 MANAGE NON-CONFORMING SCEs INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION

  30. HER AND HEMP • VERIFICATION SCHEME Identify Manage Interim Risk Until Resolution Repair / Replace / Redesign / Rectify Safety Case Cycle STAGE 5 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES STAGE 1 IDENTIFY MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDS  MAH SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Likelihood Consequence Risk FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT QRA, EERA , ESSA, NFHA, Dropped Object, Ship Collision, TRISIA, F&G Mapping, HAC, etc. DEMONSTRATION OF MAH & SCE MANAGEMENT STAGE 2 IDENTIFY SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS  SCE SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Avoid Prevent Control / Mitigate Emergency Response • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT REVIEW, SCHEDULED UPDATES, AND CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURES FACILITY HSE CASE STAGE 3 DEFINE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION Functionality Availability Reliability Survivability Interactions / Dependencies SAFETY CASE IMPLEMENTATION INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION STAGE 5 MANAGE NON-CONFORMING SCEs INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION

  31. HER AND HEMP Safety Case Cycle STAGE 5 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES • VERIFICATION SCHEME STAGE 1 IDENTIFY MAJOR ACCIDENT HAZARDS  MAH SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Likelihood Consequence Risk FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT QRA, EERA , ESSA, NFHA, Dropped Object, Ship Collision, TRISIA, F&G Mapping, HAC, etc. DEMONSTRATION OF MAH & SCE MANAGEMENT STAGE 2 IDENTIFY SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS  SCE SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Avoid Prevent Control / Mitigate Emergency Response • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT REVIEW, SCHEDULED UPDATES, AND CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURES FACILITY HSE CASE STAGE 3 DEFINE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION Functionality Availability Reliability Survivability Interactions / Dependencies STAGE 4 DEVELOP / REVIEW AND IMPLEMENT ASSURANCE PROCESSES SAFETY CASE IMPLEMENTATION Test Inspect Maintain INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION

  32. HER AND HEMP • VERIFICATION SCHEME Identify Manage Interim Risk Until Resolution Repair / Replace / Redesign / Rectify Safety Case Cycle STAGE 5 INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES  MAH SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT QRA, EERA , ESSA, NFHA, Dropped Object, Ship Collision, TRISIA, F&G Mapping, HAC, etc. DEMONSTRATION OF MAH & SCE MANAGEMENT STAGE 2 IDENTIFY SAFETY CRITICAL ELEMENTS  SCE SUITABILTY ASSESSMENT Avoid Prevent Control / Mitigate Emergency Response • CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT REVIEW, SCHEDULED UPDATES, AND CHANGE CONTROL PROCEDURES FACILITY HSE CASE STAGE 3 DEFINE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION Functionality Availability Reliability Survivability Interactions / Dependencies STAGE 4 DEVELOP / REVIEW AND IMPLEMENT ASSURANCE PROCESSES SAFETY CASE IMPLEMENTATION Test Inspect Maintain INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION STAGE 5 MANAGE NON-CONFORMING SCEs INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF SUITABILTIY AND EXECUTION

  33. Event Consequence Asset Integrity Management & Safety Case • Objective • Life-Cycle oriented • Operating facilities safely • Minimizing down-time. Avoidance of non-expected shutdowns • Implementation of a Learning process • Avoidance of swiss-cheese effects. Avoidance of orphan items/systems

More Related