1 / 11

Political Ethics

Political Ethics. Royal C ommission on Electoral Reform & Party Financing Vol 12. Public expectations . Are demanding & extensive in areas of: Process of how parties nominate candidates & select leaders Outcomes of this process in regards to fair representation

nascha
Download Presentation

Political Ethics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Political Ethics Royal Commission on Electoral Reform & Party Financing Vol 12.

  2. Public expectations Are demanding & extensive in areas of: • Process of how parties nominate candidates & select leaders • Outcomes of this process in regards to fair representation • Public interest also increased in other political institutions as Charter & constitutional debates

  3. Public’s justification for increased interest • Expectations of fair & equitable manner when selecting candidates & leaders • The large extent of government subsidies to parties/candidates through tax credits and reimbursement of election expenses • 31% of total party expenditure or $66,658,000 over four years (1988)

  4. Why? • Public perceives political parties not effective in addressing behaviour that undermines public confidence • Parties deemed unwilling or incapable of internally monitoring and enforcing fair procedure for their activities • Impression that parties not recognizing public concern suggest that more range of party activities should be regulated.

  5. Code Of Ethics • Written statement of an organization’s basic values and behaviour principles. • Often contain 2 elements: • Explicit statement of org values & principles: grounded in its philosophy, objectives & traditions • Commitment: Expectation all members are committed to these values and principles. •  Few political parties have adopted a code of ethics (Reform & Christian Heritage parties but not to article’s suggested form)

  6. Obstacles in reforming political activities • Decentralization of parties (leaders have trouble controlling member conduct, especially at constituency level) • Leaders deprived of sanctions used in the past to ensure compliance with party rules (via reduced patronage and increased use of professional experts) • Most of party members are volunteers

  7. Corporate Use of Codes • Most corphave values to guide member’s conduct & reflect corp’sbasic assumptions • “What are the principles to guide one’s conduct when interacting with others?” • Challenges same as parties: Ensuring values and rules understood and followed. Decentralized structure. Geographically dispersed. • Corps do not rely on chance to ensure employees understand the values & rules. Like political parties, corps have been publicly scrutinized and suffered decline in public confidence.

  8. Benefits of Articulating Party Values • Enable leaders to manage party standards • Foster a shared philosophy. Reinforce agreement with the values among members • Emphasize their importance as the collective standard • Enhance responsibility of party leaders for assessing member activity

  9. SO? Party Members would have to: • Conduct themselves accordingly to values (via internal peer pressure) • Valuable for members making difficult decisions – enhance incentive to put party’s long term interests ahead instead of short term goals • Forestalling regulation of party life by giving effective management resources & increase internal control.

  10. Considerations when developing a code • Realistic: balance the philosophical and practical application of values. • Permeate the org: leaders to validate principles and members will feel bound by. • Most important: Enforcement. These procedures should be fair and recognize difference between poor judgement vs. intentional violations. Solution: Could create committees or positions to perform this role.

  11. Conclusion • Code of ethics give parties tools to enforce party principles, and give members clear sense of obligation to these values. • Will increase public confidence, and increase party integrity. • Effective way to manage member conduct and forestall demands for greater regulation. • Although law is a requisite for appropriate conduct, it may not always satisfy public expectation and electoral law can only go so far in encouraging certain behaviour.

More Related