572 likes | 998 Views
Reverse Time Migration =. Generalized Diffraction Migration. Outline. 1. RTM = GDM. 2. Implications. Superresolution. Filtering. Target Oriented RTM. Fast LSM. Diffraction Selective. Perfect Migration Operators. , r,s. w. Direct wave. B ackpropagated traces.
E N D
Reverse Time Migration = Generalized Diffraction Migration
Outline 1. RTM = GDM 2. Implications Superresolution Filtering Target Oriented RTM Fast LSM Diffraction Selective Perfect Migration Operators
,r,s w Direct wave Backpropagated traces Reverse Time Migration Generalized Diff. Migration Calc. Green’s Func. By FD solves Trial image pt x d(r)= m(x) * * [ ] G(s|x) G(x|r) = dot product data with hyperbola Generalized Kirchhoff kernel Convolution of G(s|x) with G(x|r) T=0 QED: RTM can now enjoy: Anti-aliasing filter Obliquity factor Angle Gathers UD Separation Decomplexifyback&forward felds according 2 taste Etc. etc. s r x Expensive to store Calc. Green’s Func. By FD solves
,r,s w Most Kirchhoff Tricks for Kirchhoff Migration can be Implemented for RTM Direct wave Backpropagated traces Reverse Time Migration Generalized Kirch. Migration Calc. Green’s Func. By FD solves Trial image pt x d(r)= m(x) * * [ ] G(s|x) G(x|r) = dot product data with hyperbola Generalized Kirchhoff kernel Convolution of G(s|x) with G(x|r) T=0 QED: RTM can now enjoy: Anti-aliasing filter Obliquity factor Angle Gathers UD Separation Decomplexifyback&forward felds according 2 taste Etc. etc. s r x Expensive to store Calc. Green’s Func. By FD solves
Outline 1. RTM = GDM 2. Implications Superresolution Filtering Target Oriented RTM Fast LSM Diffraction Selective Perfect Migration Operators
Multiples time time Primary Primary Multiples Resolution of KM vs GDM Kirchhoff Mig. vs GDM 1. Low-Fold Stack vs Superstack 2. Poor Resolution vsSuperresolution 3. Caution: RTM sensitive to mig. vel. errors
time Rayleigh Resolution L migrate Dx = 0.25lz/L
Is Superresolution by RTM Achievable? Tucson, Arizona Test This is highest fruit on the tree..who dares pick it? 60 m ~Kirchhoff Mig. Poststack Migration ~Scattered RTM (Hanafy et al., 2008)
Can Scatterers Beat the Resolution Limit? • Recorded Green’s functions G(s|x) divided into: • Shot gathers with direct arrivals only • Shot gathers with scattered arrivals only
Outline 1. RTM = GDM 2. Implications Superresolution Filtering: 1st Arrival Filtering Target Oriented RTM Fast LSM Diffraction Selective Perfect Migration Operators
Phase Shift, Beam, Kirchhoff Migrations are Special Cases of True RTM S de (x) = [G(s|x)G(x|g)]* d(s|g) Frechet Derivative 1. RTM: ds s,g S [{} { } ]* d(s|g) G(x|g) G(x|g) G(x|g) = + + s,g S { * } ~ d(s|g) True RTM G(s|x) G(s|x) G(s|x) s,g First Arrival Filter & U p+Down filter First Arrival Filter Early Arrival Filter Super-wide Angle Phase Shift Migration Single Arrival Kirchhoff w/o high-freq. appox Multiple Arrival Kirchhoff w/o high-freq. appox (or Super beam migration)
FD only in expanding box Efficient RT Migration Operators SALT
Example (Min Zhou, 2003) Standard FD Wavefront G(s|x) Early Arrival FD Wavefront G(s|x) Standard RTM vs Early Arrival RTM
Efficient RT Migration Operators Standard FD 0 1.5 km 0 4.5 km Wavefront FD
FD/ Wavefront FD Cost 45 5 FD/ Wavefront FD Cost 500 3000 # Gridpts along side
Model 0 1.5 km 1.5 km/s 2.2 km/s 1.8 km/s Wavefront Migration Image 0 1.5 km 0 4.5 km
Reverse Time Migration 0 1.5 km 1.5 km/s 2.2 km/s 1.8 km/s Wavefront Migration Image 0 1.5 km 0 4.5 km
Outline 1. RTM = GDM 2. Implications Superresolution Filtering: 1st Arrival Filtering Target Oriented RTM Fast LSM Diffraction Selective Perfect Migration Operators
Filtering of Wave Equation Migration Operators Truncation: anti-aliasing SALT SALT
Slant stack Filtering of Wave Equation Migration Operators SALT
0 km 4.5 km 0 km 4.5 km X (km) X (km) Filtering of Wave Equation Migration Operators COG Mig. Op. Filtered COG Mig. Op. 0 s 1.0 s Z=70 m 0 s 1.0 s Time (s) Z=270 m 0 s 1.0 s Z=1190 m
Outline 1. RTM = GDM 2. Implications Superresolution Filtering: 1st Arrival Filtering Target Oriented RTM Fast LSM Diffraction Selective Perfect Migration Operators
Datum Standard Reverse Time Redatuming Special case:10 Shot Gathers at the Surface, 3 Receivers at Depth Procedure:Compute 10 FD Solves, one for each shot at z=0 Cost = 10 FD Solves to get G(x|x)
Datum Target Oriented Reverse Time Redatuming Special case:10 Shot Gathers at the Surface, 3 Receivers at Depth Trick:By ReciprocityG(x|x)=G(x|x) Procedure:Compute 3 FD Solves, one for each shot at z=datum Cost = 3 FD Solves to get G(x|x) Benefit: Several orders magnitude less expensive
Kirchhoff Migration Redatum + KM Offset (km) 0 3.5 3D Synthetic Data (Dong) W E 0 Depth (Km) 1.24 2.0 0 Offset (km) 3.5 A slice of 3D SEG/EAGE model at x=2.0 km
Interval velocity model km/s 0 5.5 Z (km) 8.0 0 y (km) 12 x (km) 6.0 0 New Datum 1.5 3D Field Data Test OBC geometry: 50,000 shots 180 receivers per shot Datum depth: 1.5 km RVSP Green’s functions: 5,000 shots 180 receivers per shot
Redatumed CSG Original CSG 0 0 Time (s) Time (s) 6.0 6.0 y (km) y (km) 4.5 4.5 0 0 3D Field Data Test
x (km) 0 KM of redatumed data 12 0 Z (km) 8 KM of original data 0 0 y (km) 5 Z (km) 8 0 12 y (km) x (km) 5 0 3D Field Data Test KM of RTD data
0 0 Z (km) Z (km) 8.0 8.0 0 0 X (km) X (km) 12 12 3D Field Data Test ( Inline No. 61 ) KM of original data KM of RTD data
0 0 Z (km) Z (km) 8.0 8.0 0 0 Y (km) Y (km) 5.0 5.0 3D Field Data Test ( Crossline No. 41 ) KM of original data KM of RTD data
0 0 Z (km) Z (km) 8.0 8.0 0 0 Y (km) Y (km) 5.0 5.0 3D Field Data Test ( Crossline No. 61 ) KM of original data KM of RTD data
0 0 Y (km) Y (km) 5.0 5.0 0 0 X (km) X (km) 12 12 3D Field Data Test ( Depth 2.0 km ) KM of original data KM of RTD data
0 0 Y (km) Y (km) 5.0 5.0 0 0 X (km) X (km) 12 12 3D Field Data Test ( Depth 2.5 km ) KM of original data KM of RTD data
0 0 Y (km) Y (km) 5.0 5.0 0 0 X (km) X (km) 12 12 3D Field Data Test ( Depth 4.0 km ) KM of original data KM of RTD data
Outline 1. RTM = GDM 2. Implications Superresolution Filtering: 1st Arrival Filtering Target Oriented RTM Fast LSM Diffraction Selective Perfect Migration Operators
Motivation (Ge Zhan) • Kirchhoff (diffraction-stack) migration is efficient but with a high-frequency approximation. • WEM method (RTM)is accurate but computationally intensive compared to KM. • Problem • Conventional RTM suffers from imaging artifacts. • Solution • Compressed generalized diffraction-stack migration (GDM) . • Wavelet compression of Green’s functions (10x or more). • Least squares algorithm.
Theory 2D Wavelet Transform appropriate threshold 10x compression r s Migration Operator G(s|x)G(x|g) (5 dimensions) x Size = nx*nz*ns*ng*nt = 645*150*323*176*1001*4 = 20 TB Too big to store.
Theory trace Green’s Function Can Scatterers Beat the Resolution Limit ?
km/s 4.5 3.5 0 0 2.5 1.5 Z (km) Z (km) 3 3 0 0 15 15 X (km) X (km) Zoom View Numerical Results SEG/EAGE Salt Model 323 shots 176 geophones peak freq = 13 Hz dx = 24.4 m dg = 24.4 m ds = 48.8 m nsamples = 1001 dt = 0.008 s
Trace Comparison 1.5 0 Time (s) Time (s) 4 1 101 201 301 401 Trace# 4 1 401 Trace # Numerical Results Wavelet Transform Compression Calculated GF Reconstructed GF 1 401 Trace # 200 MB 20 MB
Multiples 0 Time (s) 1 401 Trace# 4 1 401 Trace# Numerical Results Early-arrivals
0 0 (a) GDM using Early-arrivals (b) GDM using Full Wavefield Z (km) Z (km) 3 3 0 0 15 15 X (km) X (km) 0 15 X (km) (c) GDM using Multiples (d) Optimal Stack of (a) and (c) 0 15 X (km) Numerical Results
Outline 1. RTM = GDM 2. Implications Superresolution Filtering: 1st Arrival Filtering Target Oriented RTM Fast LSM Diffraction Selective Perfect Migration Operators
IMPLICATION #2 Exact Migration Operators from VSP SALT g(s|x)
IMPLICATION #2 * g(s|x) Exact Migration Operators from VSP * g(r|x) SALT
Exxon RVSP Data Direct Reflections Multiples Focusing Operator g(s|x) g(x|r) 0 s 0.5 s Z = .18 km X 0 km 0.2 km
Prim Refl. Kirchhoff Operator Interbed Multiple Refl. Kirchhoff Operator Exxon RVSP Data Prim Refl. Focusing Operator 0.2 s 0.28 s X 0 km 0.2 km Interbed Multiple Refl. Focusing Operator 0.31 s 0.37 s X 0 km 0.2 km