240 likes | 359 Views
THEMIS Mission PDR Project Overview and Status Peter R. Harvey University of California - Berkeley. Agenda. Agenda Science Overview Mission Overview Programmatic Overview Organization Review. Science Overview. Science Overview Purpose
E N D
THEMIS Mission PDR • Project Overview and Status • Peter R. Harvey • University of California - Berkeley
Agenda • Agenda • Science Overview • Mission Overview • Programmatic Overview • Organization • Review
Science Overview • Science Overview • Purpose To understand the onset and macroscale (1-10 Re) evolution of magnetospheric substorms. • Capabilities Will provide the first measurements of substorm starting location Will provide the first measurements of substorm evolution • Collaborating Institutions (Hardware)
Mission Overview • Mission Overview • Launch Vehicle: Delta II, Eastern Range Injection: 1.1 x 12 Re, 9 degrees inclination Date: August 2006 • Space Segment Spacecraft: 5 Spinning probes with fuel for orbit/attitude adjust Instruments: 3-Axis E-Field, B-Field 3-D Ion & Electron Particle Detectors Orbit Period(s): 1, 2 and 4 days Orientation: Ecliptic normal • Ground Segment Observatories: 20 Northern of All Sky Imaging and Mag Field • Operations Phases: I&T, L&EO (2 mo), Campaigns (Dec-Mar), Deorbit Lifetime: 2 years
Programmatic Overview • Programmatic Overview • PI Mode PI Team Provides Space, Ground, Data Segments PI Team Provides Cost, Schedule, Performance Assurance PI Team Provides Education/Public Outreach • Cost and Schedule Caps Single Cost Cap for the Mission Launch no later than March 2007 • Performance Assurance MIDEX Quality Requirements • Implementation Strategy Use Heritage Instrumentation Coordinate Common Buy Parts Keep Probe/Probe Carrier Simple and Robust
Explorers Office Frank Snow, Mission Mgr U.C. Berkeley Vassilis Angelopoulos, PI Peter Harvey, PM KSC Tammy Harrington, Mission Integ Mgr Swales Aerospace Mike Cully CETP Alain Roux B. De la Porte UCLA Chris Russell U.Colo/LASP Bob Ergun GSFC/GNCD Karen Richon Univ of Calgary Eric Donovan TU-BS Uli Auster Univ of Alberta J. Samson IWF Werner Magnes THEMIS Organization Chart Subcontracts/Agreements Phases BCD Organization
THEMIS Project 1. Management, Science, Systems Eng. 2. Space Segment Development 3. Ground Segment Development 4. Mission Ops & Data Analysis 5. Education & Public Outreach 3.1 Mission Operations Center 1.1 Management 2.1 Instruments 4.1 Mission Operations 1.2 Science 2.2Spacecraft 3.2 Science Operations Center 4.2 Data Analysis 1.3 Systems Engineering 3.3 Ground Based Observatories THEMIS Work Breakdown Structure Organization
Management, Science and Systems Engineering Program Management Peter Harvey Systems Engineering Ellen Taylor Science V. Angelopoulos Management Support K. Harps Finances M. Larson Purchasing M. Giordano Documentation D. Meilhan Scheduling A. Shutkin Administration Electrical Ellen Taylor Science Support Bonnell, John Carlson, Chuck Delory, Gregory Frey, Harald Hull, Art Larson, Davin Lin, Robert Mende, Steven Moreau, Thomas Mozer, Forrest Parks, George Peticolas, Laura Phan, Tai Temerin, Michael Mechanical /Thermal Paul Turin Chris Smith Facility Support J. Cooks Contracts J. Keenan Purchasing G. Davis Accounting J. Williams Travel J. Jones Personnel EMC/ESC/MAG Robert Snare (UCLA) Quality & Safety Ron Jackson UCB Sponsored Projects D. Weldon Contracting Parts Jorg Fischer THEMIS WBS 1.0 Organization
Instruments Instrument Data Processor Unit (IDPU) Electric Field Instrument (EFI) ElectroStatic Analyser (ESA) Solid State Telescope (SST) Fluxgate Mag (FGM) Search Coil Mag (SCM) Robert Abiad Peter Berg Heath Bersch Dorothy Gordon Frank Harvey Selda Heavner Jim Lewis Jeanine Potts Chris Scholz Kathy Walden Forrest Mozer John Bonnell Greg Delory Art Hull Bill Donakowski Greg Dalton Robert Duck Mark Pankow Dan Schickele Stu Harris Hilary Richard Charles Carlson M. Marckwardt Bill Elliott Ron Herman Robert Lin Davin Larson Ron Canario Robert Lee T. Moreau TUBS/IWF Uli Auster K.H. Glassmeier W. Magnes CETP Alain Roux Bertran de la Porte Olivier Le Contel Christophe Coillot Abdel Bouabdellah Instrument I&T Rick Sterling Mag Booms LASP Robert Ergun Aref Nammari Ken Stevens Jim Westfall Hari Dharan Y. Kim Tien Tan Bill Tyler THEMIS WBS 2.1 Organization
Ground Segment Mission Ops Science Ops (Mission Planning) Ground Based Observatories Manfred Bester Mark Lewis Tim Quinn Sabine Frey Tai Phan John Bonnell Laura Peticolas All Sky Imagers Ground Magnetometers Fielding & Operation (UC&UA) Stephen Mende Stu Harris Steve Geller Harald Frey UCLA Chris Russell Joe Means Dave Pierce UC Eric Donovan GSFC/GCND David Sibeck Mark Beckman Bob DeFazio David Folta Rick Harman UA J. Samson THEMIS WBS 3 Organization
GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER THEMIS TOP LEVEL SCHEDULE MISSION MGR. : FRANK SNOW STATUS AS OF: 11/06/03 CY 2003 CY 2004 CY 2005 CY 2006 MILESTONES J F M A M J J A S O J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D MAJOR REVIEWS PDR. CONF. REV (HQ) SRR. 11/12-14 1/15 CDR. 7/16 MCRR 1 IDPU DEVELOPMENT 4/06-07 12/08-09 BOX ASSY ETU I&T 4 5 6 1 2 3 DSG COMPL. IDPU ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T & FLIGHT FLT I&T COMPL Slack Legend 8/18 12/08 4/16 4/01 7/13 7/28 8/11 2 EFI SPB / AXB DEVELOPMENT 7/21 8/04 INSTRUMENT SLACK -- ETU TEST DSG COMPL.. 3 4 5 1 2 6 EFI SPB & AXB DESIGN, FAB, I&T PROBE CARRIER & BUS SLACK FLT I&T COMPL -- 11/26 10/12 2/12 7/06 8/03 8/31 9/28 6/08 3 ESA DEVELOPMENT MISSION SLACK -- FLT ASSY 1-6 ETU FAB ETU TESTS H/W FAB 1-6 DSG COMPL.. ESA ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T & FLIGHT FLT I&T COMPL 4/30 1/22 3/05 6/25 2/27 8/27 4 SST DEVELOPMENT ETU FAB ETU I&T FLT 1-6 FAB COMPL. 4 5 DSG COMPL. 1 2 3 6 SST ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T & FLIGHT FLT I&T COMPL 12/16 1/06 3/02 7/06 8/06 8/24 11/02 9/28 5 9/10 10/15 FGM DEVELOPMENT FLT 1-5 FGE FAB & TEST FGE ETU I&T ETU TEST (GERM.) ETU PROC/FAB FLT 1-2 DSG COMPL. 3-5 FGM ETU DESIGN, FAB, I&T & FLIGHT FLT I&T COMPL 9/29 12/29 1/26 2/23 10/18 5/31 7/26 6 SCM DEVELOPMENT ETU I&T FLT 1-6 FAB COMPL. ETU FAB 2-3 4-6 DSG COMPL.. 1 FLT I&T COMPL SCM EM DESIGN, FAB, I&T & FLIGHT 1/21 4/16 7/30 10/25 11/30 9/24 7 SCM/FGM BOOM DEVELOPMENT ETU I&T DSG COMPL.. FAB HINGES & TUBES 2 3 4 5 6 1 FLT I&T COMPL SCM EM DESIGN, FAB, I&T & FLIGHT 12/10 3/08 6/14 8/24 9/07 9/21 9/28 8/31 9/14 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 FLIGHT PLATFORM & HARNESS FLT HARNESS COMPL 8/03 8/31 9/28 9 10/12 8/17 INSTRUMENT I&T 9/14 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 ETU I&T ETU & FLIGHT 1 - 5 INTEGRATION & TEST 1/20 11/16 12/23 7/13 10/26 11/30 1/06 F5 SLACK (120 days) INSTRUMENT DELIVERY TO SWALES F1 SLACK (95 days) F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 10 PROBE CARRIER 4/06 6/06 3/10 5/04 6/29 F5 SLACK (64 days) F1 SLACK (40 days) 9/28 5/04 PROBE CARRIER DESIGN, FAB, TEST DSG & PROCURE FAB COMPL.. I&T COMPLETE 11 SPACECRAFT PROBES 8/09 9/15 6/27 LONG LEAD PROCUREMENT, SUBSYSTEM DESIGN, FAB & BUS I&T F1 F2-3 F4 F5 PROBE CARRIER SLACK (60 days) 2/16 8/10 6/24 12 8/03 PROBE & INSTRUMENT I&T PROBE F1 SLACK (60 days) PROBE F5SLACK (40 days) 5/11 10/05 PROBE I&T with INSTRUMENTS F1 F2-3 F4 F5 10/19 13 8/25 12/05 PROBE CARRIER ASSY I & T 11/23 INTEGRATION & ENVIRINMENTAL TESTS 3/15 14 LAUNCH OPERATIONS SHIP & LAUNCH PROCESSING MISSION SLACK (60 days) 5/25 LAUNCH PROCESSING/LAUNCH 8/21 Top Level Schedule
Review Process • Review Requirements and Plans • THEMIS_IIRP (7/31/03) meets GPG8700.6 • THM-CDRL011C-EPRP (9/29/03) meets GPG8700.4 • Team Selection • Chairman through which all RFAs will flow • Electrical Expert • Mechanical Expert • One or Two Sensor or Instrumentation Experts • GSFC Oversight (as always) encouraged • EPRP Instructions given to team members • LLIS Instructions & pre-selected items given to the teams • Results • Plenty of recommendations! • Not many substantive action items • Not a single LLIS “hit” (at least not identified as such)
Review Teams • Peer Review Team Composition
Review Teams • Peer Review Team Composition
RFA Status • Overall RFA Status All Responses are submitted to Explorer’s Office & kept on the THEMIS ftp site.
SRR RFAs • SRR RFA Status
SRR Recommendations • SRR Recommendation Status
Summary • Summary Stable Science and Mission Concept and Requirements No Significant Changes in Requirements or Concept No Show Stoppers Identified Development or Review Teams Organization is Active in All Development Areas Successful Staffing at UCB and Swales Staff Already in Place at Foreign Collaborators Weekly and bi-weekly Telecons Active in all Major Areas Systems Engineering in High Gear Plans Documented, In Place and in Practice Space Segment ICD’s in Signoff, Ground Segment coming up Active Review Process in Place Technical Expertise Provided in Comments and RFA process Expect These Inputs will Help Shape Detailed Designs