1 / 4

Steve Meeting January 29, 2003

Steve Meeting January 29, 2003. Took 1 M Betaine data Michelle’s data included in these results. 60 pN / s Bso BI Betaine data. There is a definite difference between 1M betaine and previous data. Note: I shifted the histograms to make the 1M look less “weird”. N=45. N=141.

nomlanga-tate
Download Presentation

Steve Meeting January 29, 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Steve Meeting January 29, 2003 • Took 1 M Betaine data • Michelle’s data included in these results

  2. 60 pN / s BsoBI Betaine data • There is a definite difference between 1M betaine and previous data. • Note: I shifted the histograms to make the 1M look less “weird” N=45 N=141

  3. Preliminary DFS • Probably would be good to take more data at different rates.

  4. Equilibrium Constant for BsoBI as a function of betaine concentration • I don’t understand the theory enough to interpret the data. • Can be related to # hydrating water molecules released upon binding. • Requires knowing “osmotic pressure” as opposed to molar concentration. • At the very least, it looks like betaine is a great way to increase the EQ constant.

More Related