1 / 6

TP2 Waveform Capture

TP2 Waveform Capture. Pavel Zivny with input from Greg LeCheminant. TOC. Proposal for the “TP2 – CR and Trigger method” “Issues for jitter/noise analysis” TP2 uncorrelated jitter/noise measurements. TP2 - CR and Trigger method Proposal:.

odeda
Download Presentation

TP2 Waveform Capture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TP2 Waveform Capture Pavel Zivny with input from Greg LeCheminant V1.0 10GMMF

  2. TOC • Proposal for the “TP2 – CR and Trigger method” • “Issues for jitter/noise analysis” • TP2 uncorrelated jitter/noise measurements V1.0 10GMMF

  3. TP2 - CR and Trigger methodProposal: • Record the single valued data pattern waveform (rather than the eye diagram) using a synchronizing timing reference obtained with a clock recovery unit having a characteristic as described in “802.3ae52.9.7 Transmitter optical waveform”*. If a sampling oscilloscope is used, the pattern waveform is acquired by means of triggering on divided recovered clock (the recovered clock is divided by the pattern length to produce a trigger edge occurring once per pattern repetition). • Only bits <x> through <y> of pattern <z> are analyzed. The bits are recognized by their position relative to the longest transition-less sequence in the pattern. In particular the bits are located <k> UIs after the sequence <?>. *See next page V1.0 10GMMF

  4. TP2 - CR and Trigger methodSupplementary info: CRU per 802.3ae From 802.3ae52.9.7 Transmitter optical waveform “A clock recovery unit (CRU) should be used to trigger the scope for mask measurements as shown in Figure 52-9. It should have a high-frequency corner bandwidth of less than or equal to 4 MHz and a slope of -20 dB/decade." V1.0 10GMMF

  5. Issues for jitter/noise analysis • Measured uncorrelated jitter and noise are assumed Gaussian or other high probability jitter. Low probability, high PkPk value jitter/noise escapes detection through RMS test. Mask test captures this, if there’d be no mask test this would need addressing in another way. • Pj, Pn are both bundled into R(andom) component That’s a pessimism. Comment from Xmitter designers desireable – is P ever a problem? • Always measure with the ORR on. Is there a consensus on this? V1.0 10GMMF

  6. Background InformationThree methods of Jitter/Noise Analysis • Analyze an LF square-wave +Simplest Measurement equipment setup − Signal far from natural − Dedicated pattern not useful for other measurements • Analyze Dedicated bit(s) within a Multi-use 348-bit Stress Pattern +Useful, near-natural pattern +Rj and Rn measurements simple & easily verifiable − Needs Trigger on Pattern (with e.g. a bit countdown trigger) − Needs a bit search (not implemented today) • Perform complete Jitter/Noise analysis (Rj and Rn,DDj and DDn) on the whole Pattern (e.g. the Multi-use 348-bit Stress Pattern) +Useful, near-natural pattern +Complete Jitter/Noise measured (rather than just one, possibly special, bit) − Needs Trigger on Pattern (with e.g. a bit countdown trigger) − Needs complete jitter/noise analysis package (single source, marginal availability today) Current choice V1.0 10GMMF

More Related