1 / 17

Restructuring for Troubled Times 5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri

Restructuring for Troubled Times 5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri Applying information and lessons learned from the 2001 Farmer Cooperatives Conference to Our Cooperative Thomas D. Larson Executive Vice President Member and Public Affairs

omer
Download Presentation

Restructuring for Troubled Times 5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Restructuring for Troubled Times5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives ConferenceNovember 13-15, 2002  St. Louis, Missouri Applying information and lessons learned from the 2001 Farmer Cooperatives Conference to Our Cooperative Thomas D. LarsonExecutive Vice PresidentMember and Public Affairs

  2. Today’s Discussion • Review 2001 value creation concept • What and how CHS implementing • What and how implementing local co-op • Performance management module

  3. Overview • Current co-op financial performance unacceptable • Ag supply has many untapped opportunities • Winning in future food landscape will be critical • Need to execute against a 5-part success model

  4. Value creation is a key metric Return on invested capital* Value created Cost of capital Invested capital = – X ROIC Annual return of investment above that expected given risk level Rate of return required to compensate investors for risk * Impact of extraordinary items excluded

  5. Value Creation • Industry • Regional co-ops • Local co-ops

  6. ESTIMATE Most ag segments destroy value Contribution to GDP, $ billions, 1999 Feed Seed Financing Fuel and electric Equipment Ag chem Fertilizer Farm services 16.4% of U.S. GDP Secon-daryproces-sing Ag inputs Farm produc-tion Primary proces-sing Food distri-bution Input Distri-bution Cost of capitalPercent 11.1 10.9 10.4 10.9 10.8 10.6 Value createdPercent, share of invested capital -2.0 -7.0 -5.4 -1.1 -2.3 0.1

  7. Financial performance ofdistribution particularly poor ESTIMATE Value created $ Millions Value created/ invested capital Percent Revenue $ Billions ROIC Percent Machinery 7.9 19 -2.5 -187 Feed 8.5 -53 16 -1.3 Fertilizer 9.1 -3.5 11 -122 12.6 Chemicals 0.1 11 2 -360 Total 57 -2.0 9.1 Input Distribution -2,519 -7.0 138 3.9

  8. ESTIMATE Regionals struggled to create value in 1999… Value created $ Millions Value created/ invested capital Percent Revenue $ Billions ROIC Percent -0.6 Farmland 11 Dairy Farmers of America 8 5.2 Cenex Harvest States 6 4.1 6 Land O’Lakes 1.6 1 Agrilink 5.2

  9. Value created/ invested capital Percent Cost of capital Percent Value created** $ Thousands ROIC Percent Revenue** $ Millions Quartile* 1 14.2 24 5.1 9.2 248 2 6.3 27 -3.0 9.3 -169 3 26 -7.8 1.8 9.5 -424 4 -9.3 9.4 14 -18.7 -559 Total -4.8 23 4.6 9.4 -227 Value Created Across Local Co-ops * Segmented by value created/invested capital ** Mean values for co-ops in quartile Source: Member co-op survey; team analysis

  10. CHS Value Creation (EVA) • Mid 1990s • Executive management and board • Operating management • Financial measurement • Recognition program

  11. EVA(economic value-added) Earnings minus (equity x minimum acceptable rate of return) • EVA recognizes there is no free capital • Equity represents an investment • Investor expects a return

  12. CHS Co-op Performance Measurements • Profit • EVA • Cash Flow • ROI • Investment Grade

  13. Local Co-op value creation • 4% above cost of borrowed capital • 9 - 12% ROE • Numerous meetings • Benchmarking

  14. % Greater than Rate of # % of % of Local % of 50% Term Debt/ Return Accts. Sales Savings Accounts Local Equity 9%+ 216 52% 96% 39% 37% 5-9% 110 15% 15% 20% 16% 0-5% 108 17% 6% 20% 27% Below 11716%(17%) 21% 49% 0% Return on Local Equity Analysis

  15. Cooperative System Ag Supply Grain $ Sales $(0-10) $(10-25) $(25-50) $(50-75) $(75-100) $(100+) Volume -------------------------------------------- 278 accounts 63% savings -------------------------------------------- 49 accounts 49% savings 9%+ 5-9% 0-5% Below 0 # accts. 216 savings- 96% 203 accounts (10%) savings 23 accounts (2%) savings Summary # accounts 481 # accounts 72 % savings 53% % savings 47% Return on local equity

  16. 2 4 Pursue operational excellence Drive customer integration 5 Create performance obsession 1 3 Leverage horizontal scale Exploit vertical opportunities PFP success model Strategy Structure Existing Emerging

  17. Thank you!!

More Related